It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף י,א גמרא

??? ??? to throw of its blood some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry and to offer ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry R' Yochanan said: forbidden "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? except ??? he said it is permitted. yes. "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? and not ??? except ??? and if we had heard In this case, In this case, Raysh Lakish said but: ??? I would say he would acknowledge the correct position of for him to Rabbi Yochanan and if we had heard this one In this case, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rabbi Yochanan but: ??? I would say he would acknowledge the correct position of for him ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. When Rav Dimi came he said He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? to Rabbi Yochanan And Rabbi ??? Rav ??? to Rabbi Yochanan for just as in a place ??? he said Behold, I am slaughtering with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time that he was is valid ??? in order to throw ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time is invalid, a place ??? he said Behold, I am slaughtering that did not have ??? is invalid, ??? in order to throw ??? that did not have ??? is it not logical that it should be is invalid, He disagreed with this Raba son of ??? Just as outwards ??? which provides he is spiritually cut off except Rabba said: son of ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for just as a place ??? he said Behold, I am slaughtering with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place that he was is valid ??? in order to throw ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, a place ??? he said Behold, I am slaughtering that did not have ??? it is invalid. ??? to throw ??? that did not have ??? is it not logical that it should be is invalid, He disagreed with this Rav Ashi Just as outwards to his place which provides accustomed in all ??? shall you say ??? that is not accustomed except on Passover and A sin-offering except Rav Ashi said thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for just as in a place ??? he said Behold, I am slaughtering for the sake of lit. in the name of so-and-so that he was is valid to throw ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of so-and-so is invalid, a place ??? he said Behold, I am slaughtering that did not have ??? it is invalid. ??? to throw their blood that did not have ??? is it not logical that it should be is invalid, Rabbi ??? No. shall you say Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified ??? From a "kal vachomer", ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: to say ??? "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? and Perhaps ??? If so, ??? he read of him ??? by a "kal vachomer" of Rav ??? And the other one ??? thus Just as ??? which provides ??? north ??? And the other one now from this ??? it was said: it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? to throw of its blood that did not have ??? Rav ??? he said is invalid Rava said: is valid and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had of him. Rabbah to join with the body of Rav ??? From a "kal vachomer", of Rav ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: Even ??? It was taught: R' Eliezer said A sin-offering she entered on Watch out for leading vav he sinned and a guilt-offering came on Watch out for leading vav he sinned Just as A sin-offering that did not have ??? is invalid Even a guilt-offering that did not have ??? is invalid, He said to him: Rabbi Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? the case is that of a sin-offering, which provides of its blood is more He said to him: Rabbi Eliezer Passover He corrects ??? to the bottom ??? that did not have ??? is invalid, He said to him: Rabbi Yehoshua Just as ??? which provides its time ??? He said to him: Rabbi Eliezer A sin-offering ??? He said to him: Rabbi Yehoshua

דף י,ב גמרא

??? Rabbi Eliezer had a vision ??? judgement after A sin-offering it is said of it She ??? She ??? that did not have ??? is invalid Passover it is said in it he ??? he ??? is valid that did not have ??? is invalid, Even a guilt-offering it is said in it he he ??? is valid that did not have ??? is invalid, He said to him: Rabbi Yehoshua A sin-offering it is said of it She ??? She ??? is valid that did not have ??? is invalid Passover it is said in it he ??? he ??? is valid that did not have ??? is invalid, but: a guilt-offering It is not said in it he except after ??? and should it itself that did not have ??? is valid He said to him: R' Eliezer Behold! says (Lev. 6) ??? Just as A sin-offering that did not have ??? is invalid, Even a guilt-offering that did not have ??? is invalid, Mar said: He said to him: R' Yehoshua ??? judgement and he shall take a bamah an elevated place for offerings. the trapping of It is because of this: That there are ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides there are of them trapping of he is spiritually cut off He said to him: R' Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? the case is that of a sin-offering, which provides of its blood is more and let us say, for him No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? the case is that of a sin-offering, which provides enter of its blood before and inwards ??? the outermost ones we say it. ??? enter of its blood ??? and inwards is invalid it has to Rabbi Eliezer Even ??? which provides ??? on ??? which provides require four presentations like Rabbi Yishmael for he said: all ??? require four presentations ??? on four corners ??? the principal amount ??? except one ??? three they would taste ??? Mar said: He said to him: R' Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? Let us say, for him Rabbi Eliezer a guilt-offering also ??? is more Abayye said: a guilt-offering ??? is more No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? is a kal vachomer the highest for just as an elevation-offering that it ??? of its blood to the bottom a guilt-offering that is not ??? is it not all the more so? Just as ??? which provides It is not ??? A sin-offering of a bird: ??? Just as ??? which provides It is not ??? zevach-offering an elevation-offering ??? No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them that are The holiest of holy offerings and their blood to the bottom Even I ??? a guilt-offering that he was ??? holy offerings ??? to the bottom Raba said to him ??? to Rav Ashi ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? shall you say ??? in which there is to him ??? except we were The reason is of Rabbi Eliezer For scripture said: (Lev. 6) ??? it it of its blood is more And there is no meaning to the word ??? of after is more If so, A sin-offering also Let him say it ??? is valid that did not have ??? is invalid this one the remainder of offerings? between ??? between that did not have ??? are proper This certain individual it This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ for it is the case that ??? Passover Here in this case, also, This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ for it is the case that ??? An elevation-offering of a bird: ??? from this No. ??? something And if you like, I could say So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon She for he said: This a place ??? and that one a place ??? as it is taught: ??? to the bottom ??? and onwards Rabbi Eliezer said ??? Shimon Regarding what items ??? but: the case is that of a sin-offering, livestock She herself yes. was it made? except on ??? of ??? It was taught there: that he was Rabbi Akiva says: all ??? who enter ??? But the sages say: A sin-offering only. Rabbi Eliezer says: Even ??? as it is said ??? This is satisfactory Rabbi Eliezer ??? The reason is except rabbis What is the reason? Rabba said: a guilt-offering enter ??? within is invalid, No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? the highest Just as

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.