It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קג,א משנה

all that did not have took possession the altar of ??? No. ??? priests ??? as it is said (Lev. 7) ??? a man an elevation-offering ??? an elevation-offering one whose slaughter involved the intention to consume its meat that did not have ??? despite the fact that did not have is credited lit, rises ??? Awake, to the priests one ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man and one ??? the his wife ??? to the priests skins simple offerings ??? skins The holiest of holy offerings to the priests ??? for just as if an elevation-offering that did not have ??? The holiest of holy offerings ??? is it not logical ??? yes. An altar of He corrects that do not to him ??? in any place

דף קג,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? a man creates an exclusion ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use these are the words of R' Yehudah Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says creates an exclusion ??? is destiny? ??? What then does it mean when it says creates an exclusion ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use he said Rabbi Chiyya son of Joseph creates an exclusion ??? from ??? This is satistfactory ??? are permitted ??? except ??? are permitted ??? an individual ??? What is there to say? Like that which was said by Raba The elevation-offering an elevation-offering the first So, here, The elevation-offering an elevation-offering the first Rabbi ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? creates an exclusion ??? an elevation-offering ??? the house No. ??? my sanctity ??? the house ??? according to Torah law, except even ??? No. ??? What case is he dealing with? meat but: ??? and thus Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah creates an exclusion ??? from ??? He said to him av Hamnunah for Rav, ??? like who like Rabbi Yehudah this one he returns of him. as it is taught: Six ??? from ??? that it shall not be priests ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. He said to him: Rabbi ??? And there are those who say it was Rabbi Shimon If so, ??? of Yehodia, ??? as it is taught: this ??? Yehodia, ??? (Lev. 5) a guilt-offering he a guilt-offering a guilt-offering to Hashem all It is because of this: came A sin-offering but on account of a guilt-offering ??? in it ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Awake, to the priests He said to him except Master, in what way ??? to it He said to him ??? for him ??? Joshua For it was taught in a baraita ??? they were of them ??? to join with the body of An altar of ??? Rabbi Eliezer says ??? ??? peace-offerings ??? with the remainder of items of movable property ??? the house Rabbi Yehoshua says: ??? peace-offerings ??? but the remainder of items of movable property ??? the house And even if to Rabbi Joshua for he said: a person ??? What case is he dealing with? meat but: ??? Rabbi Yosei ??? Yehudah says creates an exclusion ??? is destiny? ??? He said to him: Rav ??? son of ??? because ??? Is this not a man he He said to him: creates an exclusion ??? And he does not have ??? The rabbis taught: ??? a man yes. for me except ??? a man ??? is destiny? ??? women and slaves from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? The elevation-offering ??? If so, Just as Therefore, scripture states: ??? a man an elevation-offering ??? creates an exclusion ??? outside its designated time or outside its designated place that it shall not be the priests. ??? It is possible that I ??? one whose slaughter involved the intention to consume its meat that did not have ??? Because and It is not credited ???

דף קג,ב גמרא

No. ??? priests ??? Scripture states: ??? The elevation-offering In any case, ??? The elevation-offering yes. for me except ??? The elevation-offering skins The holiest of holy offerings from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? The elevation-offering who he sacrificed It is possible that I ??? Even simple offerings Scripture states: an elevation-offering Just as an elevation-offering The holiest of holy offerings Even all The holiest of holy offerings Rabbi Yishmael says ??? The elevation-offering yes. for me except The elevation-offering skins The holiest of holy offerings from where do we learn It would be a logical inference for just as an elevation-offering that did not have ??? The holiest of holy offerings ??? is it not logical ??? An altar of He corrects ??? in the case of the flesh. and not took possession ??? Just as ??? which provides No. took possession in part shall you say ??? in part Because ??? in part ??? Rabbi says all himself No. ??? except ??? The elevation-offering only. ??? a place ??? walking after ??? there are. ??? with them A sin-offering and a guilt-offering and peace-offerings of ??? gifts ??? those particular No. ??? they eat those particular atop על גבי ??? simple offerings ??? those particular ??? they eat those particular for the sake of ??? but: an elevation-offering it is said of it (Lev. 1) ??? The elevation-offering ??? it ??? It is possible No. ??? the priests. ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 7) ??? The elevation-offering who he sacrificed to him it shall be creates an exclusion for a tevul yom ??? that it is possible No. ??? in the case of the flesh. that he was as regard to eating, ??? that is not as regard to eating, Scripture states: to him it shall be creates an exclusion ??? and A tevul yom ??? And the first tanna also Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for me ??? the validity That it comes ??? "and the writing of to it he read and Rabbi Yishmael This who he sacrificed What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him creates an exclusion for a tevul yom ??? Is it not enough for him ??? it shall be Rabbi Yishmael with his reasoning for he said: Rabbi Yochanan It is because of this: Rabbi Yishmael it is said the case is that of an elevation-offering, to him it shall be and it is said ??? to him it shall be Just as there ??? are permitted Even here, ??? are permitted ??? For if it was No. ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? is permitted. to him it shall be he read ??? he

דף קג,ב משנה

all ??? of them is invalid, before ??? yes. ??? to the priests after ??? to the priests he said Rabbi ??? viceroy the priests. ??? No. I saw ??? who goes out ??? he said Rabbi Akiva ??? we have learned ??? the first-born and it is found ??? the priests. ??? But the sages say: yes. No. ??? proof except he has fulfilled his obligation ???

דף קג,ב גמרא

all that did not have took possession the altar of ??? No. ??? the priests. ??? and even though ??? before the sprinkling with whom does it agree? Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon She for he said: yes. the blood ??? on ??? alone by itself I would say at the end of the teaching, all ??? of them is invalid, before ??? yes. ??? to the priests after ??? to the priests ??? to Rabbi for he said: the blood ??? on ??? alone by itself But the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Abayye said: ??? Rabbi She But the beginning of the teaching, also Rabbi She give thanks Rabbi that do not flaying before the sprinkling Rava said: ??? Shimon at the end of the teaching, also ??? What then does it mean when it says before flaying

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.