It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קד,א גמרא

And what does it mean when it says after flaying before ??? after ??? What then does it mean when it says Rabbi And what does it mean when it says Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon as it is taught: Rabbi says the blood ??? on ??? alone by itself ??? with ??? nolad in it is invalid, between before the sprinkling between After the act of sprinkling, Behold! he one like it; Rabbi Eliezer ??? says yes. the blood ??? on ??? alone by itself ??? with ??? nolad in it is invalid, before the sprinkling Behold! he one like it; after ??? meat one hour ??? and its skin to the priests Let us say, ??? Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua what they disagree about (Deut. 12) and You did ??? and the blood Rabbi Yehoshua says: if yes. blood yes. meat if yes. meat yes. blood Rabbi Eliezer says: blood despite the fact that do not meat as it is said (Deut. 12) ??? If so, Just as Scripture states: and You did ??? and the blood to say to you Just as blood Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified Even meat Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified this one ??? there are between ??? Let us say, ??? No. ??? Joshua who follow the reasoning ??? ??? does not disagree Because specifically, where they disagree is this: who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Joshua ??? No. ??? like Rabbi Joshua ??? He could say to you Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Rabbi Yehoshua there i.e., in another mishna except in the case of the flesh. ??? to the priests but: ??? That there are ??? to the priests even Rabbi Yehoshua give thanks something ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? meat or ??? or that went out except ??? Rabbi Eliezer says ??? Rabbi Yehoshua says: No. ??? and Rabbi Yehoshua acknowledges ??? In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? Rabbi Chanina said: viceroy the priests. ??? and not Behold! Bulls that are burnt And goats that are burnt ??? No. we say it. Behold! before flaying and before the sprinkling ??? we say it. ??? after flaying and before the sprinkling to Rabbi ??? Shimon for he said: yes. the blood ??? on ??? alone by itself Rabbi ??? like Rabbi he reasons for himself. And if you wish, I would say even ??? like Rabbi ??? Shimon give thanks Rabbi that do not flaying before the sprinkling ??? his reasoning is ??? also where he teaches Rabbi Akiva said: ??? we have learned ??? the first-born and it is found ??? the priests. ??? Learn from this and Rather, what can we conclude? Come and learn from this. Rabbi Akiva Thus can we come and learn from this. even in the borderlands Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said The halacha is like Rabbi Akiva. And even Rabbi Akiva did not say except ??? but not they permitted ??? No. And the halacha is according to the opinion in accordance with the words of the sages ???

דף קד,א משנה

Bulls that are burnt And goats that are burnt at a time i.e., in a case that are are burnt ??? in the house of ??? and impart tumah garments and if are not are burnt ??? are burnt in the house of ??? and are not impart tumah garments

דף קד,ב משנה

they were ??? that specific ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah that are the first except ??? they have not fulfilled the mitzvah that are the first impart tumah garments ??? are not impart tumah garments until that were taken out from the Courtyard they have fulfilled the mitzvah both these and these: impart tumah garments Rabbi Shimon says: are not impart tumah until ??? the fire lit., the light ??? yes. ??? renders clothing tamei

דף קד,ב גמרא

What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said: a place there are ??? the house ??? was his name and Reish Lakish: he said all the house all of it ??? as it is said (I Chron. 29) ??? who ??? Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah three the house of ??? there are. the house of ??? The greatness he was in the courtyard ??? invalid as regarding The holiest of holy offerings The offal of simple offerings ??? of them is invalid, before the sprinkling the house of ??? after he was ??? the house ??? Bulls that are burnt And goats that are burnt ??? of them is invalid, after ??? except ??? It was taught by Levi three the house of ??? there are. the house of ??? The greatness he was in the courtyard ??? invalid as regarding The holiest of holy offerings The offal of simple offerings and Bulls that are burnt And goats that are burnt ??? of them is invalid, between before the sprinkling between After the act of sprinkling, the house of ??? after he was ??? the house ??? of them is invalid, ??? except ??? he is required Rabbi ??? What then? ??? who say For ??? in the case of the flesh. a thing food but: Behold! ??? My son, food ??? No. or, perhaps, there is no difference Rabba said: this one the validity ??? for him ??? for him ??? they agree ??? that did not have One who acts anything Is this not ??? No. ??? also No. ??? and Perhaps ??? he that is not ??? but: ??? Come and hear: Bulls that are burnt ??? We apply the laws of misappropriation to them from the moment of their being declared holy. ??? Subject to disqualification, in the case of a tevul yom one who has already immersed in a mikveh but remains tamei until nightfall ??? or by sitting overnight, Is this not ??? meat No. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, all of them We apply the laws of misappropriation to them in the house of ??? until ??? meat But the beginning of the teaching, also meat something ??? at the end of the teaching, meat But the beginning of the teaching, ??? Come and hear: for it teaches: Levi ??? of them is invalid, ??? Is this not ??? No. is invalid, ??? is invalid, ??? R' Eliezer asked: ??? What then? ??? And goats that are burnt What then does it mean when it says ??? for him Thus said Rabbi Yirmiyah bar Abba who follow the reasoning ??? ??? No. they come its time to go out who say that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי meat ??? to go out guilt-obligation but: Behold! ??? to go out guilt-obligation No. or, perhaps, So, here, No. they come its time to go out Come and hear: for it teaches: Levi ??? in it is invalid, when he went out from it Is this not is invalid, ??? No. is invalid, ??? is invalid, ??? he is required Rabbi Eliezer Bulls that are burnt And goats that are burnt that went out the majority of his body ??? What then? ??? according to ??? for him Hey, isn't it the case that No. ??? for him or, perhaps, according to ??? This is obvious! that is not ??? do we go? according to ??? except that went out ??? This ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.