It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קח,א גמרא

the tip of son of ??? in which is not an olive's volume and salt ??? What then? Raba said to him ??? to Rav Ashi Is this not we were ??? of R' Yochanan and Reish Lakish: ??? to Rabbi Yochanan ??? to R' Yochanan ??? he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: R' Yochanan there i.e., in another mishna except ??? he but: salt ??? a thing ??? he No. ??? he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: Reish Lakish: there i.e., in another mishna except For if it was ??? Is this not a commandment ??? But here, in this case, For if it was ??? a commandment ??? No. or, perhaps, They did not teach this לא שנו ??? R' Yosi the Gallilean says ??? Rabbi under Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean Just as ??? inside ??? outside ??? to him ??? shall you say ??? except ??? outside that did not have it was to him ??? Shimon under Rabbi Yehudah the Gallilean Just as ??? inside ??? outside which provides ??? shall you say ??? outside that do not ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? he said ??? night There is this difference between them: Rava said: ??? in a vessel weekday that it is possible ??? tamei who ate between ??? then the ruling is acceptable. ??? for him rabbis to Rabbi Yosei: the Gallilean Rabba said: all in a case ??? and after this ??? meat everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree ??? which provides ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? meat and after this ??? is a law established by the Rabbis reason that say ??? and R' Yosi the Gallilean reasoned we do not say ??? and Rabbi Yosei, ??? we do not say ??? on ??? meat Rav Ashi said From where can you derive ??? is stricter Perhaps ??? meat is stricter which provides It does not have ???

דף קח,א משנה

??? ??? he is liable ??? is exempt ??? two ??? are exempt ??? they are obligated raised up and raised up had a vision and he returned and raised up he is liable on all ??? these are the words of Rabbi Shimon R' Yosei says he is not liable except One and he is not liable until ??? to the beginning lit., to the head the altar of Rabbi Shimon says: even raised up on ??? or on ??? he is liable

דף קח,א גמרא

what is the difference here, ??? this he is exempt from punishment although his action was improper As it is written (Lev. 17) to Hashem ??? also it is written to Hashem It is different there in that case For scripture said: (Lev. 17) a man a man regarding ??? also it is written a man a man should bring himself that two ??? they are obligated If so, So, here, should bring himself that two ??? It is different there in that case For scripture said: This certain individual one and not two If so, regarding ??? also this one it is written This certain individual should bring himself

דף קח,ב גמרא

??? If so, Here in this case, also, ??? two This certain individual are written So rather, to Hashem why do I have to discharge the mitzvah a male goat ??? The Rabbis taught (Lev. 17) a man a man Just as Scripture states: ??? two ??? that it is possible Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as ??? two ??? are exempt ??? is it not logical ??? are exempt Scripture states: a man a man these are the words of Rabbi Shimon Rabbi Yosei says: This certain individual one and not two If so, Just as Scripture states: a man a man ??? Torah ??? people and Rabbi Shimon This This certain individual should bring himself ??? and Rabbi Yosei, ??? This certain individual and Rabbi Shimon he This certain individual No. he expounds. and Rabbi Yosei, ??? a man a man ??? Torah ??? people This certain individual a man a man also ??? Torah ??? people So rather, ??? for him ??? for him (Lev. 17) ??? This certain individual blood he poured it and even ??? raised up and he returned and raised up ??? he said Reish Lakish: It is a disagreement ??? And Hashem Abraham ??? reasoned For it is written to do that specific on ??? he he is liable and he is not liable on ??? he ate livestock it is written and one master reasons that he ate ??? it is written but: ??? one the words of all are he is not liable except One And R' Yochanan said: It is a disagreement ??? one ??? reasoned ??? and raised up outside he is liable and one master reasons that is exempt but: ??? And Hashem ??? the words of all are he is liable on all ??? and disagrees because of Ulla for he said: ??? Everyone acknowledges ??? outside ??? No. ??? except ??? outside ??? outside ??? reasoned is exempt ??? he is liable that it is possible that they said Ulla said Everyone acknowledges ??? except ??? outside that he was is exempt No. ??? except ??? outside ??? is exempt ??? he is liable ??? of Shmuel ??? that came first because of Ulla for he said: The father of Shmuel like who ??? to join with the body of An altar of like who that is not ??? and he is not liable until ??? Rav Huna said What is the reason? of R' Yosi As it is written (Gen. 8) ??? An altar of to Hashem that R' Yochanan said What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? As it is written (Judges 13) ??? ??? and the Minchah ??? on ??? to Hashem And the other one also For it is written ??? An altar of to Hashem This certain individual ??? in reality And the other one also this one it is written ??? hour it was And if you wish, I would say ??? As it is taught: Rabbi Shimon says: (Lev. 17) An altar of he opens ??? festival And there is no meaning to the word An altar of ??? For this reason raised up on ??? or on ??? he is liable he has fulfilled his obligation should bring himself This is what he means: For this reason in the hour of prohibits ??? raised up on ??? or on ??? he is liable he is required Rabbi Yosei the son of Rabbi Chanina the principal amount ??? and the base ??? What then? ??? He said to him Rabbi ??? It was taught: the principal amount ??? and the base ??? that is large And there is no meaning to the word ??? a small one

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.