It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יא,א גמרא

an elevation-offering that it ??? enter of its blood within is valid a guilt-offering that is not ??? not all the more so? Just as ??? which provides It is not ??? Minchah-offering of a sinner ??? and let us say, A sin-offering of a bird: ??? A sin-offering of a bird: ??? of Rabbi Avin: She ??? Just as ??? a sinner which provides It is not ??? zevach-offering an elevation-offering ??? and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them that are The holiest of holy offerings and he has entered ??? within are proper Even I ??? a guilt-offering that he was ??? holy offerings and he has entered ??? within is valid He said to him: Raba ??? to Rav Ashi ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides Watch out for leading vav And they do not have ??? shall you say ??? in which there is to him ??? except we were their reason is a law established by the Rabbis For scripture said: of its blood of its blood of -- this refers to and not of its blood of after And the other one of its blood and not ??? And the other one blood of its blood And the other one blood of its blood No. he expounds. This is satisfactory According to the sages, that they said a guilt-offering ??? that did not have ??? is valid we were ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon says: (Lev. 6) and that which was sanctified for Temple use holy offerings She ??? Minchah-offering of a sinner Behold! She ??? For this reason ??? that did not have ??? is invalid Minchah-offering of ??? Behold! She ??? For this reason ??? that did not have ??? is valid except to Rabbi Eliezer for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one of Rabbi Shimon For it was taught in a baraita that did not have in a vessel of service is invalid and Rabbi Shimon considers it proper and Rav Yehudah said the son of Rabbi Chiyya What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? Scripture states: and that which was sanctified for Temple use holy offerings She ??? came ??? in the hand of ??? in a vessel ??? and Rabbi Shimon This he read ??? for him ??? for him ??? the essence he read ??? Yehudah the son of Rabbi Chiyya he who has arrived and Minchah-offering of a sinner ??? that did not have ??? other than this ??? A sin-offering The reason is What then does it mean that it is written of it She Minchah-offering of a sinner also it is written of it She and According to the sages, for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? a guilt-offering ??? to say to you Just as A sin-offering require ??? Even a guilt-offering required ??? Joseph son of ??? says ??? that R' Yochanan said Joseph son of ??? and Rabbi Eliezer And they said a thing one Rava said: with others for the sake of a sin-offering. ??? as it is taught: the Paschal offering ??? and thus ??? others for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover ??? Rabbi Eliezer invalidates it and Rabbi Yehoshua considers it proper R' Yehoshua said: if in the remainder of ??? the year that is not is valid ??? others are proper ??? that he was is valid ??? is it not logical ??? others ??? He said to him: Rabbi Eliezer or ??? the things for just as if in the remainder of ??? the year that is not is valid ??? is valid he for the sake of lit. in the name of others ??? that he was is valid ??? is it not logical ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of others ??? Passover ??? ten that did not have ??? thus in the same way You say What do I have to learn from ??? others in the remainder of ??? the year ??? which provides he is valid for the sake of lit. in the name of others ??? others ??? which provides he is invalid, for the sake of lit. in the name of others He said to him: Rabbi Yehoshua If so, ??? The strength Passover ??? The strength ??? Rabbi Eliezer had a vision ??? judgement after ??? is permitted. Passover came peace-offerings And there is no meaning to the word is permitted. peace-offerings came Passover for just as Passover ??? came peace-offerings ??? peace-offerings is invalid, peace-offerings that do not ??? came Passover if ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover ??? is it not logical ???

דף יא,ב גמרא

He said to him: Rabbi Yehoshua ??? is permitted. A sin-offering came an elevation-offering And there is no meaning to the word is permitted. an elevation-offering came A sin-offering for just as A sin-offering ??? came an elevation-offering it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it for the sake of lit. in the name of an elevation-offering is invalid an elevation-offering that do not ??? came A sin-offering it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it for the sake of a sin-offering. is it not logical that it should be is invalid He said to him: Rabbi Eliezer No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? the case is that of a sin-offering, which provides is valid ??? all the year All of it shall you say on Passover that is not is valid ??? except ??? Because This is only in the case is invalid, ??? It would be a logical inference ??? others ??? Shimon my brother ??? says ??? Rav Ashi he would say over in the name of Rabbi Yochanan and Rav Acha the son of of Raba he would say over in the name of Rabbi ??? What is the reason? ??? my brother ??? For scripture said: (Lev. 22) and not ??? my sanctity the Children of Israel those whom ??? to Hashem ??? from them yes. ??? from them ??? and that one ??? he who has arrived Hey, isn't it the case that should bring himself ??? for Shmuel said: from where do we learn ??? ??? that he was ??? as it is said and not ??? my sanctity the Children of Israel those whom ??? to Hashem ??? is what the scripture says. If so, to write he read who ??? What then does it mean when it says who ??? "Hear!" of him ??? he is required Rabbi Zeira are proper And there is no meaning to the word try to calm And so ??? or, perhaps, are proper and try to calm ??? Abayye said: (and there are those who say Rabbi Zerika Come and hear: the first-born and the tithe ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings are proper peace-offerings ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of first-born or for the sake of lit. in the name of tithe ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that are proper and try to calm first-born son of ??? he except are proper And there is no meaning to the word try to calm ??? are proper And there is no meaning to the word try to calm But the beginning of the teaching, also are proper And there is no meaning to the word try to calm something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has Rather, what can we conclude? Come and learn from this. that is high ??? Come and learn from this. ??? How so? The holiest of holy offerings ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of simple offerings etc. What would you have said? The holiest of holy offerings simple offerings he That there are that is high ??? but: ??? No. Here, too, ??? peace-offerings ??? the first-born because of that are ??? the giving of four ??? this one the essence this particular ???

דף יא,ב משנה

the Paschal offering ??? morning, ??? ten that did not have ??? Rabbi Yehoshua considers it proper it is as if ??? in a case where there are three ten en Beteira invalidates it it is as if ??? twilight he said Shimon ben Azzai ??? I ??? and two an elderly person by day ??? Rabbi Eliezer ??? for all of ??? that did not have ??? are proper except that did not have if they put it up on the altar ??? It is because of this: guilt-obligation except for the Paschal offering and from ??? and not ??? ben Azzai except The elevation-offering but they did not agree with him the sages

דף יא,ב גמרא

Rabbi Eliezer said said Rabbi Osha'ya considers it proper he was en Beteira on Passover ??? morning, ??? ten ??? day ??? he And what does it mean when it says it is as if ??? for he said: Rabbi Yehoshua it is as if he said ??? also it is as if If so, ??? do they not disagree in the case ??? If it was ??? then I might incorrectly say: but: ??? he would acknowledge the correct position of Rabbi Yehoshua ??? Because and partially ??? Come and hear from this For it is written (Ex. 12) twilight Ulla said the son of of Rav ??? between two evenings." The Tamid-offering As it is written of him. (Ex. 29) twilight Here, too, ??? day is valid there i.e., in another mishna From the fact that it is written (Ex. 29) ??? one shall you do in the morning from this general principle it would follow ??? twilight actually and really I would say one in the morning Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one completely day one in the morning and not two in the morning lamps As it is written (Ex. 29) twilight Here, too, ??? day is valid It is different there in that case As it is written est and until mornings and it was taught: (Ex. 27) est and until mornings give to it ??? that it should be ??? est and until mornings Another thing: yes. to you the blessing of the Service is valid est and until mornings except -- this refers to only. the incense As it is written of it (Ex. 30) twilight Here, too, ??? day is valid that I incense

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.