Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף יב,א גמרא
??? there i.e., in another mishna also it is written (in Deut. 16) in that place ??? the Paschal offering in the evening, This certain individual ??? a thing he who has arrived as it is taught: ??? a thing as it is said in it in the evening, and twilight for a matter of that did not have it is said in it except twilight only. and who that it is possible something For this ??? for him from daybreak is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? he And so ??? twilight is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? a thing yes. ??? Yochanan The halacha is he prays of the afternoon service (Minchah) and after this he prays of the additional offerings and twilight As it is written regarding incense ??? why do I have And furthermore, ??? Rabbi under en Beteira according to the words of Rabbi Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? in a case where there are three ten that do not partially ??? shall you say ??? ten that a little bit of it ??? and if ??? all of it it is appropriate except that R' Yochanan said invalidates it he was en Beteira on Passover ??? ten morning, between ??? between that did not have ??? Because and partially ??? of it Rabbi Abahu If so, Passover is valid ??? in what way does It concerns itself If it was ??? he and if ??? he except he said Rabbi Abahu shall be after ??? Abaye said even you say from daybreak yes. ??? time his heart by day Rav Papa said, even you say From twilight night yes. ??? time for it was taught in the academy of R' Yishmael ??? enter ??? of Rabbi ??? pointed out a contradiction. it is written (Lev. 22) and it was the case that seven days under of its mother this one night Look, and then it is written (Lev. 22) From the day ??? this one night No. Look, How so? night to "Kedushah", and the day ??? Rabbi Zeira said to him: to Rabbi ??? Let us say, his reasoning is Rabbi Yochanan ??? life, ??? He said to him: yes. for thus said Rabbi Yochanan livestock of two ??? half of it and he returned ??? half of it ??? "Kedushah" It is not ??? and they shall make a substitution. ??? of it And learn from this three Learn from this ??? life, ??? so learn from this ??? from the beginning it was. ??? so learn from this
דף יב,ב גמרא
there are ??? with its monetary value? Ulla said Rabbi Yochanan said: he ate milk ??? sacrifice ??? and he returned in it Because ??? it was said: also he said R' ??? he said Rabbi Abahu Rabbi Yochanan said: he ate milk ??? sacrifice ??? and he returned ??? Because ??? and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was we had heard the first It is because of this: ??? But here, in this case, ??? he is equivalent. and if we had heard Here in this case, It is because of this: ??? in his hand ??? But here, in this case, ??? in his hand ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this he is required Rabbi ??? he ate milk ??? sacrifice ??? a court ??? is permitted. and they returned of them What then? who you shall ??? or shall not be ??? He said to him: This certain individual elder For he opens Rabbi Yochanan ??? he opens What is the reason? there i.e., in another mishna a person ??? sacrifice No. ??? Here in this case, sacrifice also ??? he said Shimon ben Azzai ??? and two an elderly person ??? why do I have ??? and two an elderly person ??? are they, ??? No. ??? ben Azzai except ??? Rav Huna said What is the reason? ??? (Lev. 1) an elevation-offering he a woman ??? to Hashem She ??? is valid that did not have ??? is invalid a guilt-offering also it is written of him. he This certain individual after ??? it is written: This also after ??? it is written: two he are written regarding a guilt-offering also two he are written except ben Azzai ??? to it for just as A sin-offering that is not ??? it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it that did not have ??? is invalid an elevation-offering that it ??? is it not all the more so? Just as ??? which provides ??? Passover He corrects Just as ??? which provides its time ??? A sin-offering ??? and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them that are holy offerings ??? that did not have ??? is invalid, Even I ??? an elevation-offering that it holy offerings and it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it that did not have ??? is invalid Just as ??? regarding them in which there is of them trapping of he is spiritually cut off ben Azzai
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.