It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יג,א גמרא

trapping of he is spiritually cut off No. ??? a guilt-offering also he shall take a guilt-offering ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides ??? by the community ??? And if you wish, I would say trapping of he is spiritually cut off also ??? ben Azzai ??? to it Hey, isn't it the case that for he says Rav Huna ??? No. he said except ??? of it ???

דף יג,א משנה

the Paschal offering ??? that did not have ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- that did not have ??? or ??? or in the case that one is not ??? or that did not have ??? How so? ??? or in the case that one is not ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings that did not have ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings for the sake of lit. in the name of Passover ??? items ??? and Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified Rabbi Shimon considers it proper ??? that he was says it would be impossible that did not have ??? or in the case that one is not ??? or in the case that one is not Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified but: ??? without ??? beside the altar of ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? in a place that he was It is necessary for him ??? in a place that does not require ??? yes. ???

דף יג,א גמרא

??? who ??? For it was taught: (Lev. 1) and bring offerings -- this refers to ??? the blood You say ??? the blood Or perhaps, except ??? For as it says: ??? Behold! ??? say So how am I to resolve that and bring offerings -- this refers to ??? the blood My son, ??? the priests. that it should be ??? is valid and in a vessel of service he said Rabbi Akiva from where do we learn ??? that ??? should not be is valid and in a vessel of service it is said here, My son, ??? and it is said there (in Numbers 3) ??? desolations My son, ??? the priests. ??? Just as there ??? is valid and in a vessel of service Even here, ??? is valid and in a vessel of service he said Rabbi ??? ??? if No. I hear ??? between ??? And there is no meaning to the word for me ??? he said Rabbi Akiva I ??? No. One who acts of it ??? One who acts of it ??? outside he is not liable he is spiritually cut off ??? outside ??? he is spiritually cut off its acceptance of the blood was performed by invalid priests we are not guilty on its account ??? we are guilty on its account He said to him: Rabbi ??? ??? I I hear And there is no meaning to the word for me ??? you ??? He said to him: ??? all ??? from you ??? Rabba said: There is no difficulty. here, ??? an invalidating act nevertheless here, ??? that did not have ??? also where he teaches ??? and not The tanna teaches: ??? an invalidating act nevertheless No. ??? For it was taught: It is possible she will not be ??? except Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified only. from where do we learn ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 7) and if ??? shall eat ??? zevach-offering ??? No. ??? regarding items ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of food is what the scripture says. It is possible that I ??? Even ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 7) on the third day No. ??? that specific No. ??? are in the general category it was and for what reason Came forth To make an analogy from it to say to you Just as ??? is isolated ??? that it the blessing of the Service ??? and is essential atonement Even all the blessing of the Service and is essential atonement they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? that do not ??? ???

דף יג,ב גמרא

except There is no difficulty. this one for he said: ??? of its blood tomorrow this one for he said: ??? he accepts of its blood in order ??? tomorrow He said to him one of the rabbis to Raba ??? No. ??? in them? ??? For it was taught in a mishna: It is possible she will not be ??? except ??? meat from where do we learn ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 7) and if ??? shall eat ??? is what the scripture says. One ??? a person and one ??? An altar of There is no difficulty. this one for he said: ??? in order ??? tomorrow this one for he said: ??? poured ??? in order to offer ??? R' Yehudah said: the son of Rabbi Chiyya I hear ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, ??? he said in front of Rav ??? he said anything we have learned an invalidating act nevertheless except ??? Just as peace-offerings yes. ??? of them Even A sin-offering yes. ??? of them And so The entirety ??? If it was Just as peace-offerings that did not have ??? yes. sent forth something an invalidating act nevertheless Even A sin-offering that did not have ??? yes. sent forth something an invalidating act nevertheless Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you to say ??? he said Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi ??? -- this refers to I hear ??? she became of it ??? anything ??? an invalidating act nevertheless except ??? Just as peace-offerings yes. ??? of them Even A sin-offering yes. ??? of them And so The entirety ??? If it was Just as peace-offerings that did not have ??? yes. sent forth something an invalidating act nevertheless Even A sin-offering that did not have ??? yes. sent forth something an invalidating act nevertheless he said Rabbi Yosei the son of Rabbi Chanina yes. The entirety ??? Because and with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place invalidates it ??? or in the case that one is not ??? invalidates it the case is that of a sin-offering, Just as with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? sent forth something an invalidating act nevertheless Even that did not have ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, ??? something an invalidating act nevertheless Thus said Rabbi ??? Just as outwards to his place ??? which provides accustomed in all ??? shall you say ??? that is not accustomed except on Passover and A sin-offering only. Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you to say a thing ??? of them who brought them out something an invalidating act nevertheless a thing ??? of them ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of an invalidating act nevertheless Here in this case, also, a thing ??? of it sent forth something an invalidating act nevertheless a thing ??? of it ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of an invalidating act nevertheless Rav said ??? Even We also ??? This is the general rule: all The fistful of a meal-offering he gives in a vessel ??? This is satisfactory the accompanying handful of flour we were ??? we were ??? also we were ??? except he gives in a vessel What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say ??? who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna ipso facto Here in this case, ??? and pointed out a contradiction. except immediately that is not ??? that is not he will give on ??? the blessing of the Service ??? She So, here, immediately that is not ??? that is not does he act? to it on ??? we were ??? No. In reality lit: In the world ??? Here in this case, ipso facto there i.e., in another mishna ??? and he will give immediately ??? and this the giving of implements of he What do I have to learn from ipso facto What do I have to learn from ??? and he will give Let us say, ??? for it teaches: one ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, And another teaching No. ??? and not ??? Is this not ??? She No. this one rabbis this one Rabbi Shimon If it was Rabbi Shimon why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.