It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יד,א גמרא

all that is not on the outside altar ??? yes. in it It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless but how do you reconcile that with this teaching Hey, isn't it the case that rabbis And there is no difficulty. here, ??? the outermost ones here, ??? sin-offerings the outermost ones This is obvious! No. it is written in them? and immersed It was necessary to provide both opinions You might have thought that I would say that Because and then it is written ??? and if will come ??? pointed out a contradiction. them ??? he is required ??? like who As it is written and immersed he is equivalent. ??? No. it is written and immersed ??? thus ??? Rabbi Shimon considers it proper ??? R' Shimon ben Lakish (Resh Lakish) said give thanks Rabbi Shimon ??? sin-offerings ??? in them? Because and the blessing of the Service that do not It is possible ??? For didn't Rabbi Shimon say all that is not on the outside altar ??? we are not guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless R' Yosi said the son of Rabbi Chanina give thanks he was ??? by a "kal vachomer" for just as that did not have ??? is invalid, the case is that of a sin-offering, with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? is it not logical ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place From where do we derive this? If it was ??? Just as outwards ??? which provides he is spiritually cut off If it was ??? which provides accustomed ??? that did not have ??? in what way accustomed on Passover and A sin-offering Passover and A sin-offering ??? No. ??? And if you wish, I would say ??? he the third this with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time an invalidating act nevertheless ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place Rabba said: if ??? to say R' Shimon derive it ??? for he said: between ??? north yes. ??? sin-offerings ??? except ??? and inwards and if you seek to say derive it like Rabbi Yehudah for he said: ??? The Courtyard --- make kiddush. yes. ??? except ??? and outwards and if you seek to say reasoned the sanctity of ??? one She yes. ??? except ??? and outwards and if you seek to say ??? the opening ??? yes. ??? even a stride One except ??? and if you seek to say reasoned ??? that did not have ??? No. her name ??? yes. ??? He said to him Abaye ??? of Rav Chisda he is required of him ??? What then? He said to him is valid and the written Torah ??? (II Chron. 35) ??? the Paschal offering ??? the priests. the blood ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Sheishet ???

דף יד,ב גמרא

??? and the master of ??? Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified is invalid, and thus who dwells and thus ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Chisda he read he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: that He performs It once happened ??? Rabbah and Rav Yosef; who both say ??? It is a disagreement R' Shimon And the rabbbis Rabbi Shimon for he said: the blessing of the Service where it is possble ??? Is this not the blessing of the Service She is valid ??? According to the sages, is invalid He said to him Abaye Hey, isn't it the case that ??? and is valid ??? He said to him ??? Is this not the blessing of the Service She and not For didn't R' say Zeira Rav said ??? a cow ??? is invalid And Rav says He ascended ??? it is written of it that I a cow ??? the house She Is this not all ??? he my sanctity ??? the house ??? the blessing of the Service my sanctity An altar of Is this not the blessing of the Service She Rav said ??? the son of of Rav This something ??? leprous plague ??? the blessing of the Service She ??? the priesthood Consider this case: ??? Abraham ??? where it is possble ??? She and is invalid ??? as it is written (Lev. 1) ??? The entirety ??? and Mar said: -- this refers to ??? Abraham ??? in a case ??? in a case that is not ??? No. ??? Is this not all ??? he for just as ??? Abraham ??? that is not ??? atonement ??? the priesthood ??? blood ??? atonement ??? it was said: ??? Ulla said R' Elazar said ??? is invalid even to Rabbi Shimon They posed this difficulty: ??? that did not have ??? her name ??? or No. her name ??? Come and hear: and thus who dwells and thus ??? is invalid, this one ??? is equivalent ??? is valid Perhaps who dwells ??? is equivalent ??? Come and hear: ??? Israel ??? were given to his fellow and his fellow to his fellow there i.e., in another mishna also ??? and And what can we come and learn from this? (Prov. 14) ??? with ??? a king Come and hear: ??? and gave ??? he returns ??? I would say he shall return ??? it was said: Ulla said that R' Yochanan said ??? that did not have ??? No. her name ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.