Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף טו,א גמרא
??? or No. ??? Come and hear: ??? and gave ??? he returns ??? also ??? If it was You might have thought No. ??? to it Who deduces and it was standing ??? No. and it was standing ??? it was said: Ulla said R' Yochanan said: ??? that did not have ??? is invalid Perhaps, No. ??? Rav ??? from ??? on ??? is valid Here in this case, with what are we dealing? when he went out outwards ??? he departs ??? No. ??? in a place ??? If you wish, I would say ??? And if you wish, I would say ??? a Tanna taught: ??? all Behold! And furthermore, ??? on ??? is invalid, ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? when he went out outwards but: enter within is invalid, ??? was it said; ??? that did not have ??? It is a disagreement Rabbi Shimon And the rabbbis ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? He ascended in the west except A sin-offering of a bird: ??? of it ??? in what way does It concerns itself If it was ??? He ascended ??? blood No. anything She and if according to ??? blood ??? for him ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Perhaps ??? and until ??? for it is the case that Rabbi brought this very question ??? Zeira he was from this ??? of from this before it was even the case that they come blood ??? the altar of What then? And he said to him: ??? and gave in the case of For they came Rav ??? and Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua ??? Rav They said: we were ??? does not disagree Hey, isn't it the case that Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? except ??? the whole world does not disagree that is not ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? a priest and he returned ??? They disagreed about this, My son, Rabbi Chiyya and R' ??? One says is valid and one says is invalid, one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that No. ??? a priest ??? and he returned ??? Rav said ??? son of ??? according to the words of ??? is invalid, according to the words of ??? considers it proper Rava said: Even according to the words of ??? is invalid, What is the reason? for it is the case that It is necessary for him
דף טו,ב גמרא
??? He said to him: Rav ??? to Rav Ashi Thus said Rav ??? this one It is necessary for him ??? It is a disagreement Rabbi Eliezer And the rabbbis For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Eliezer says ??? in a place ??? a place that do not It is necessary for him ??? yes. ??? Rabba said: Everyone acknowledges ??? outside ??? inside ??? inside ??? outwards ??? that do not It is necessary for him ??? No. ??? except ??? and he returned ??? one master reasons that this one It is necessary for him ??? Is this not ??? he is equivalent. ??? Abaye Rabbi Eliezer says ??? a place ??? How so? ??? outside ??? within ??? inside ??? outwards ??? that do not It is necessary for him to walk Hey, isn't it the case that ??? had a vision he He said to him If it was It was taught: It was taught:
דף טו,ב משנה
all ??? their blood ??? A tevul yom ??? garments that did not have He washed ??? and pilgrimage festivals ??? tamei who dwells ??? atop vessels atop livestock atop ??? his fellow ??? Rabbi Shimon considers it proper
דף טו,ב גמרא
??? From where do we derive this? for it teaches: Levi (Lev. 22) "Speak to ??? and do not his children saying: ??? the Children of Israel etc. the Children of Israel ??? What then does it mean when it says Shall I say ??? women sacrifice women ??? was sacrificed except ??? some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles now ??? No. ??? As Mar said: ??? between in error between with intent No. ??? was sacrificed except thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? the Children of Israel and not ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael a Tanna taught: We come to compare ??? Just as the master of ??? if a slave ???
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.