It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טז,א גמרא

??? that is not he eats is it not logical ??? a slave ??? Just as ??? which provides One who acts in it was sacrificed ??? tamei He corrects Just as ??? which provides become tamei the master of ??? He corrects and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them ??? and if his male slave ??? Even I ??? that he was ??? and if a slave ??? From where do we derive this? ??? If it was ??? it is written of him. except (in Numbers 18) ??? No. ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides No. ??? No. you say tamei He corrects except I would say ??? He corrects Just as ??? which provides is forbidden ??? He corrects and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them ??? etc. So, here, ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides No. ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? the son of of Raba and Who is it who says to us ??? is forbidden ??? Perhaps Sarai ??? Rav ??? he said We come to compare is a kal vachomer ??? Just as who dwells ??? if a slave ??? that is not he eats is it not logical ??? a slave ??? Just as ??? which provides is invalid, ??? a scholar תלמיד חכם Just as for the sake of lit. in the name of who dwells which provides is invalid, ??? in that place who dwells No. ??? and if Scripture states: ??? We come to compare ??? who dwells ??? From where do we derive this? Scripture states: (Deut. 10) to stand before Hashem ??? before Hashem and not before ??? From where do we derive this? As it is written and from ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. and not ??? this one after that did not have he has fulfilled his obligation ??? Rabbi Eliezer he said from here (Lev. 10) there are. bring offerings I ??? from this general principle it would follow For if it was we do not have ??? then the ruling is acceptable. ??? and Rabbi Eliezer What is the reason? did not say ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. He could say to you Is it written this one after that did not have he has fulfilled his obligation ??? And the other one What is the reason מאי טעמא did not say from them bring offerings his reasoning is because of ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael a Tanna taught: We come to compare ??? for just as

דף טז,ב גמרא

the master of ??? if a slave ??? that do not he eats is it not logical ??? a slave ??? Just as ??? which provides One who acts in it ??? He corrects Just as ??? which provides he (the possibility of repair if done improperly) does not have the master of ??? He corrects and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them that are ??? and if his male slave ??? Even I ??? and if a slave ??? Shall I say ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? it is written of him. except (Lev. 10) from them bring offerings but his thought is because of ??? that it is possible to find fault with this argument Just as ??? regarding them which provides No. ??? tamei He corrects Just as ??? which provides become tamei ??? and he returned justice. etc. one thing is equivalent regarding them ??? etc. ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides No. ??? next to the high priest ??? an individual in that place ??? from this ??? Rav ??? he said We come to compare ??? for just as who dwells ??? if a slave ??? that is not he eats is it not logical ??? a slave ??? Just as ??? which provides is invalid, ??? a scholar Just as for the sake of lit. in the name of who dwells which provides is invalid, ??? in that place who dwells No. ??? and if ??? to say ??? We come to compare ??? Rabba said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? an individual but: ??? community ??? from tumah Just as ??? that did not have ??? next to the high priest ??? an individual ??? next to ??? community ??? next to the high priest ??? an individual is it not logical ??? next to a priest ??? He disagreed with this Raba son of ??? No. ??? next to the high priest ??? an individual by a "kal vachomer" for just as ??? next to a priest ??? by the community No. ??? next to the high priest ??? an individual ??? that did not have ??? next to a priest ??? community is it not logical that did not have ??? next to the high priest ??? an individual ??? next to ??? an individual From a "kal vachomer", for just as ??? that did not have ??? next to a priest ??? community ??? next to the high priest ??? an individual ??? next to a priest ??? community is it not logical ??? next to ??? an individual and not ??? next to a priest ??? community by a "kal vachomer" for just as ??? next to ??? an individual No. ??? next to a priest ??? community ??? that did not have ??? next to the high priest ??? an individual is it not logical that did not have ??? community ??? and not ??? an individual and an individual ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.