It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כו,א גמרא

??? and after this ??? is invalid ??? and after this ??? is valid the master of ??? except I would say ??? and after this ??? and after this ??? is invalid ??? and after this ??? is valid Hey, isn't it the case that R' Zayra said: ??? and after this ??? is invalid, as it is said ??? A bull that he was Already R' Chisda said he said ??? until ??? and after this ??? is invalid ??? blood ??? blood he Perhaps It is because of this: ??? meat simple offerings that went out before the sprinkling of blood is invalid, Perhaps in the case of the holiest of holy offerings The Rabbis taught The holiest of holy offerings are slaughtered in the north ??? their blood in a vessel of service in the north he stood ??? is valid ??? is invalid He brought in his head and the majority of his body it is as if enter all of it ??? and Came forth to south. ??? is valid simple offerings are slaughtered inside and the receiving their blood in a vessel of service inside he stood outside and He brought in ??? within ??? is valid ??? is invalid He brought in his head and the majority of his body it is as if No. enter ??? and Came forth outwards ??? is invalid Learn from this meat simple offerings that went out before the sprinkling of blood: ??? perhaps, ??? and two ??? The father of Shmuel brought this very question ??? She inside ??? outside What then? He said to him it is written (Lev. 17) ??? to Hashem until that it should be All of it within ??? What then? He said to him is valid He said to him ??? in the case of ??? on ??? there is not in this case. ??? What then? He said to him: is invalid He said to him: ??? on ??? and not ??? on ??? What then? He said to him: is valid He said to him: ??? yes. a way ??? objection ??? What then? He said to him: is invalid He said to him: ??? on ??? and not ??? on ??? Abayye said: in the case of the holiest of holy offerings all of them ??? son of ??? in the case of simple-holiness offerings. all of them ??? son of from ??? Rabba said: what is the difference here, ??? in the case of simple-holiness offerings. ??? he is equivalent. in the case of the holiest of holy offerings also ??? north ??? he is equivalent. except Rabba said: between in the case of the holiest of holy offerings between in the case of simple-holiness offerings. ??? son of from ??? in the case of the holiest of holy offerings ??? between in the case of the holiest of holy offerings between in the case of simple-holiness offerings. Rabbi brought this very question ??? Zeira he inside ??? outside What then? He said to him: Is this not is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? to Hashem until ??? All of it within Here in this case, also, (Ex. 28) ??? to ??? festival until ??? all of it ??? festival

דף כו,א משנה

were given atop ??? that did not have opposite the foundation he gave ??? to the bottom is more and ??? is more to the bottom and ??? inside outside and ??? outside inside is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision,

דף כו,ב גמרא

Shmuel said is invalid, meat but: ??? What is the reason? For scripture said: (Lev. 17) and as for me, ??? to you on the altar of ??? immediately arrived blood ??? If so, meat also Scripture states: ??? and not to a different matter Perhaps, his reasoning is that did not have in his place ??? he is equivalent. We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? were given on ??? that did not have opposite the foundation he gave ??? to the bottom is more and ??? is more to the bottom and ??? inside outside and ??? outside inside if there are blood ??? he shall return ??? and he shall accept And if it enters your mind to argue that that did not have in his place ??? why do I have he shall return ??? and he shall accept And if you say ??? meat in cases regarding eating who that it is possible ??? that is not ??? meat in cases regarding eating If it was ??? is valid So, here, Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? is invalid, ??? For it was taught in a baraita and all of them ??? Outside its designated time or outside its designated place if there are blood ??? he shall return ??? and he shall accept ??? yes. ??? No. What is the reason מאי טעמא Is this not It is because of this: that there is ??? No. It is because of this: ??? If so, ??? also And furthermore, who ??? For didn't Raba say yes. ??? except ??? In the matter ??? in a place ??? No. you say ??? No. except I would say ??? No. And what can we come and learn from this? ??? For this reason there are. invalidate it ??? Thus can we come and learn from this. ??? No. ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? to give ??? is more to the bottom to the bottom is more ??? is valid ??? ??? had a vision

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.