It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כז,א גמרא

with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. tomorrow is invalid, ??? had a vision between with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time between with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, and if that did not have in his place ??? he is equivalent. This is invalid, an invalidating act nevertheless he Mar Zutra said: ??? meat in cases regarding eating ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of an invalidating act nevertheless ??? that is not ??? meat in cases regarding eating No. ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of an invalidating act nevertheless Rav Ashi said to him for Master ??? to you this one As it is written (Lev. 7) and if ??? shall eat ??? zevach-offering ??? an invalidating act nevertheless it shall be who ??? to him he has fulfilled his obligation this that do not ??? to him except prohibits Another thing: ??? to him If so, ??? also No. Subject to disqualification, Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said something ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah ??? he said In reality lit: In the world is invalid, actually and really or in the case that one is not in his place ??? he is equivalent. And there is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? to give ??? to the bottom is more is more to the bottom until something ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah etc. Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: This and this ??? or in the case that one is not in his place Is this not ??? he is equivalent. Hey, isn't it the case that That there are blood ??? this one ??? blood ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, This is satisfactory ??? we were where he teaches is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, except to Rabbi Yochanan What then does it mean when it says Watch out for leading vav And there is not the penalty of excision, it is a problem ??? What then does it mean when it says Watch out for leading vav And there is not the penalty of excision, This is what he means: if he gave ??? is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, and Rabbi Yochanan If it was that did not have in his place Is this not ??? he is equivalent. ??? For ??? from ??? on ??? derive it ??? No. ??? for he said: Rav Isaac bar Joseph that R' Yochanan said Everyone acknowledges ??? is more ??? is more to the bottom ??? to the bottom that did not have ??? No. ??? No. ??? except ??? is more ??? to the bottom to the bottom ??? is more for Rabbi ??? says No. ??? and Rabbi Shimon says: ???

דף כז,ב גמרא

??? in accordance with the words of One who says No. ??? and Rav Chisda he said ??? The entirety ??? to the bottom ??? is more that did not have ??? and all the more so ??? is more ??? to the bottom Because ??? to the bottom there are. have come No. ??? except ??? within ??? outside outside ??? within ??? says ??? and Rabbi Shimon says: No. ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said Even We also ??? Rabbi Yehudah says (Lev. 6) this She The elevation-offering Behold! these ??? creates an exclusion ??? by night ??? of its blood that went out of its blood except ??? if is credited lit, rises ??? Rabbi Shimon says: an elevation-offering yes. for me except an elevation-offering is valid from where do we learn ??? one whose slaughter involved the intention to consume its meat by night ??? of its blood that went out of its blood except ??? and who goes but that which is coming out ??? Outside its designated time or outside its designated place ??? And they sprinkled its blood. ??? is more ??? to the bottom ??? to the bottom ??? is more ??? inside ??? outside ??? outside ??? inside and the Paschal offering ??? that did not have ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: ??? The elevation-offering ??? Torah One for all ??? that if they put it up on the altar May not descend, It is possible that I ??? Even ??? ??? and he goes out the wall Scripture states: this for just as you see ??? those and to discharge the mitzvah those ??? I those that he was ??? and sends forth I those that did not have he was ??? The tanna teaches: from this ??? to the bottom ??? is more and onwards ??? to the bottom and not ??? Rabbi Yehudah What is the reason מאי טעמא Is this not It is because of this: ??? An altar of And learn from this No. ??? Thus said Rabbi Eliezer An altar of ??? make kiddush. ??? And what can we come and learn from this? ??? inside etc. If it was from there then I might incorrectly say: that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי blood ??? for him but: the accompanying handful of flour that is not Look, for him I would say No. Come and learn from this. They challenged him from this teaching: incense ??? that to join with the body of ascended An altar of ??? that do not to you make kiddush. ??? except the outside altar ??? to him ??? yes. ??? No. ??? thus incense ??? that do not the outside altar make kiddush. ??? except ??? to him ??? between ??? to him between that do not ??? to him What is the reason? This ??? and that one implements of ???

דף כז,ב משנה

??? ??? to throw ??? outside or a small portion of ??? outside to offer ??? outside or a small portion of ??? outside to eat ??? outside or an olive's volume ??? outside or to eat an olive's volume ??? outside is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, to throw ??? tomorrow a small portion of ??? tomorrow to offer ??? tomorrow or a small portion of ??? tomorrow to eat ??? tomorrow or an olive's volume ??? tomorrow or to eat an olive's volume ??? tomorrow an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account.

דף כז,ב גמרא

???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.