It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כח,א גמרא

??? he is equivalent. And then it happened that ??? An altar of to a person Shmuel said So, with whom does it agree? R' Eliezer She for he said: "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? An altar of ??? a person ??? a person ??? An altar of For it was taught in a baraita ??? ??? to eat a thing whose way is not to eat to offer a thing whose way is not to offer is valid ??? invalidates it in what way have you established that it is ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, This is the general rule: all ??? to eat a thing ??? to eat and to offer a thing ??? to offer a thing ??? to eat yes. whose way is not to eat No. ??? According to the sages, But the beginning of the teaching, R' Eliezer and the end of the teaching is the rabbis. He said to him: yes. Rav Huna he said ??? Is this not ??? he is equivalent. Rabba said: What is the reason מאי טעמא For Rav Huna (Lev. 3) ??? and not ??? Rav Chisda he said In reality lit: In the world ??? he is equivalent. and here in this other case, with what are we dealing? ??? of ??? all of them ??? they do not say But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and the end of the teaching is the rabbis. No. ??? Like Rav Huna they do not say ??? he is equivalent. ??? them ??? What is the reason? they do not say And what can we come and learn from this? ??? he is equivalent. ??? and these ??? and Rav Chisda It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in the matter of ??? But here, in this case, I would say (in Numbers 18) ??? like the way when the kings they eat and not ??? kings ??? thus I would say No. Come and learn from this. They challenged him from this teaching: ??? The elevation-offering to offer an olive's volume ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. ??? son of Yehudah a man ??? says It is because of this: Rabbi Ya'akov and thus he was Rabbi Shimon son of Yehudah a man ??? says It is because of this: R' Shimon one ??? the house of ??? livestock that are small and one ??? of ??? and one ??? and all ??? the sages regarding ??? and these ??? of the house of ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. an elevation-offering yes. but: zevach-offering No. This is satisfactory to Rav Huna. we were where he teaches an elevation-offering except for Rav, ??? What is the purpose of teaching: an elevation-offering Let the Tanna teach: zevach-offering Rav would say to you ??? If you wish, I would say ??? of ??? And if you wish, I would say It was taught by ??? is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, ??? From where do we learn this? Shmuel said two ??? are written Who is it Rabbah said (Lev. 7) the third ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time an invalidating act nevertheless ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? from him one and not two ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place and so go ahead and say ??? from him ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time is preferable ??? of him. ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is preferable ??? for him except Abayye said: For he came Rav Isaac son of ??? right next lit: and leaning ??? a Tanna taught: For as it says: the third ??? that do not Scripture states: for behold! Already it is said (Lev. 7) and if ??? shall eat ??? zevach-offering ??? on the third day

דף כח,ב גמרא

if he does not one topic outwards ??? in the matter of with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? the Merciful One regarding notar (Lev. 19) ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place and so go ahead and say ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? notar ??? notar it was. for him ??? iniquity iniquity outwards ??? for him ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place it was. for him ??? iniquity iniquity outwards ??? for him ??? except Rabbi Yochanan said: It was taught by ??? son of Levi We come to compare ??? It is written here (Lev. 19) and that which was sanctified for Temple use Hashem ??? And it is written there (Ex. 29) ??? ??? in fire etc. Just as there notar Even here, notar ??? the Merciful One regarding notar ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? outside ??? and the third ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? I ??? outside ??? iniquity iniquity ??? for him ??? outside to his place and the third ??? outside ??? It is because of this: ??? for him ??? for him except Rabba said: all of them the written Torah ??? As it is written (Lev. 7) ??? shall eat ??? is what the scripture says. one ??? a person and one ??? An altar of ??? zevach-offering ??? Just as peace-offerings ??? Even all ??? the third this with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time No. ??? is valid thus ??? is invalid, for just as ??? is valid until ??? all ??? Even ??? is invalid, until ??? all ??? he ??? and does not ??? on the third that specific ??? is what the scripture says. and does not ??? No. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.