It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כט,א גמרא

No. ??? in it ??? an invalidating act nevertheless this with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place it shall be This teaches ??? this with that ??? from him one and not two and whichever this with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? iniquity iniquity ??? for him ??? He said to him: Rav ??? to Raba ??? the third ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? of him. This certain individual should bring himself to the place that it should be ??? with blood in the case of the flesh. and in the case of their offal Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for me the written Torah that came first if ??? shall eat ??? the Merciful One ??? the third Rav Ashi said ??? in front of Rav gifts He said to him If it was from there then I might incorrectly say: the third creates an exclusion an invalidating act nevertheless A general principle: was it made? A general principle: ??? on ??? the remainder of ??? Come and hear from this The Rabbis taught (Lev. 7) and if ??? shall eat ??? zevach-offering ??? he said Rabbi Eliezer ??? to hear ??? to eat ??? on the third day is what the scripture says. Or perhaps, except ??? the third is what you say? Do you really mean that? after that he was is valid he shall return ??? He said to him: Rabbi Akiva there are. ??? in the case of a zav ??? day opposite day that are of a presumption that ??? And because of the fact ??? Even you to ??? on this ??? He said to him: Behold! he says ??? in the hour of ??? he ??? and does not ??? on the third Or perhaps, says ??? except this a priest ??? For as it says: that specific ??? he ??? and does not ??? ben Azzai says that specific Just as Scripture states: on account of as it is said (Deut. 23) No. ??? It is possible Even based on this lit: from after, ??? without ??? Scripture states: that specific that specific without ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? without ??? others say No. ??? he ??? and does not ??? on the third ben Azzai ??? is what the scripture says. and does not ??? for him If you like, I could say ??? for him ??? And if you wish, I would say From the fact that it is written No. ??? and not ??? he ben Azzai that specific without ??? And there is no meaning to the word based on this lit: from after, ??? without ??? from here ??? as it is taught: others say It is possible ??? first-born ???

דף כט,ב גמרא

??? Scripture states: (Deut. 14) "And you shall eat before Hashem your God tithe ??? etc. There is an analogy between first-born ??? Just as tithe he does not ??? Even first-born he does not ??? It is necessary to teach this You might have thought that I would say that What case is he dealing with? first-born ??? son of ??? he but: holy offerings ??? I would say No. ??? Come and learn from this. ??? from there ??? (Deut. 23) and it was the case that about You Watch out for leading vav he sinned and not ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned ben Azzai This certain individual he had asked for him and it was the case that about You Watch out for leading vav he sinned and not ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned You might have thought that I would say that Because and Rabbi Eliezer said (and there are those who say Rabbi Yochanan yes. his wife of a person ??? unless it is ??? from him money or property And he does not have as it is said (Prov. 22) if yes. to you to make whole For what reason ??? iniquity ??? also ??? others say ??? he ??? and does not ??? on the third and Rabbi Eliezer No. ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? for he said: Rabbi ??? from where do we learn ??? -- this refers to ??? as it is said No. ??? No. ??? in it ??? Rav ??? he would say over he said Rabbi ??? from where do we learn ??? that he was ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 7) No. ??? Rav Ashi said to him for Rav, ??? Is this not in which is not It once happened he and all Is this not in which is not It once happened yes. ??? upon it Rabbi Yehudah said to him: She for he said: Is this not in which is not It once happened ??? upon it

דף כט,ב משנה

This is the general rule: all ??? to eat a thing ??? to eat and to offer a thing ??? to offer an olive's volume with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? but we become liable to excision on its account. but only ??? the releasing ??? How so? was sacrificed the releasing ??? If he slaughtered in silence without a declaration one way or the other ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time or ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- ??? or ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? the releasing ??? How so? No. was sacrificed the releasing ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time or ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place or ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? the Paschal offering ??? that did not have ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time or ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- that did not have ??? or ??? he has walked In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- their blood that did not have ??? that did not have was sacrificed the releasing ??? to eat an olive's volume outside an olive's volume tomorrow an olive's volume tomorrow an olive's volume outside ??? olive tree outside ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? olive tree outside is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, Rabbi Yehuda said This is the general rule: all ??? to the east ??? the place ??? but we become liable to excision on its account. and if ??? the place to the east ??? is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, But the sages say: both this and this is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, to eat ??? olive tree to offer ??? an olive's volume is valid that do not food ??? combine together

דף כט,ב גמרא

Didn't Ilfa say: The disagreement in this case is about two acts of service? but: In a single act of service the words of all are ??? you shall And Rabbi Yochanan said: Even In a single act of service It is a disagreement This is satisfactory ??? at the end of the teaching, also ??? except to Rabbi Yochanan But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, In a single act of service

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.