It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

??? because of this the writing of ??? his wife but he had second thoughts they found son of ??? and he said to him my Name ??? in that place ??? in the same way your wife is invalid, ??? in it perhaps, It is different there in that case ??? for him for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? except ??? because of this he has two women ??? the writing of ??? an adult female No. ??? in it a minor female perhaps, It is different there in that case ??? for him for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? except ??? because of this he said ??? It is written ??? is invalid, ??? in it perhaps, It is different there in that case ??? except ??? the writing ??? It is necessary for him ??? a place Watch out for leading vav "and the man a place the his wife a place the witnesses a place ??? And Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said Even It is necessary for him ??? a place Behold! it is permitted. for all ??? Watch out for leading vav And, too, pointed out a contradiction. the validity ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Rav Yehudah Rav said A sin-offering ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of an elevation-offering is invalid it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it for the sake of lit. in the name of Those who are ill ??? Perhaps, ??? of it ??? No. ??? of it We challenge that from the following baraita all ??? that did not have for the sake of lit. in the name of a woman is invalid, And even if for the sake of lit. in the name of some texts read: a worshipper of stars ??? also is invalid, and a second person writ ??? some texts read: a worshipper of stars ??? of him it was. for him ??? is invalid, holy offerings ??? Those who are ill ??? it was. for him ??? are kosher ??? the validity ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Rav Yehudah Rav said A sin-offering ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of an elevation-offering is invalid it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it for the sake of lit. in the name of Those who are ill ??? Perhaps, ??? of it that is not ??? No. ??? of it For it was taught: (Lev. 11) ??? and not ??? And even if implements of ??? and a second person they make Those who are ill next to holy offerings ??? next to an oven Just as a partition next to an oven does not take effect to it A general principle: Even Those who are ill next to holy offerings does not take effect for him A general principle: For it was taught in a baraita an oven ??? or ??? and it is found ??? in one place The entirety tamei ??? that it ??? seek ??? the oven ??? the oven tamei ??? they eat ??? and Rabbi Eliezer ??? he said Rabbi Eliezer ??? If it saves??? ??? No. ??? in a vessel pottery ??? They said to him: No.

דף ג,ב גמרא

If it saves??? ??? a donkey which provides ??? in a vessel A deaf person ??? that do not ??? According to the sages, to Rabbi Eliezer What is there to say? R' Eliezer ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: If so, there i.e., in another mishna also Let us say, ??? holy offerings ??? holy offerings Those who are ill is it not all the more so? except The reason is of Rav like Rabbi ??? For Rabbi Eliezer said: What is the reason of Rav? (Lev. 22) and not ??? my sanctity the Children of Israel those whom ??? to Hashem holy offerings ??? holy offerings And there is no meaning to the word Those who are ill ??? holy offerings Perhaps, he came he read ??? by a "kal vachomer" Here in this case, also, he shall take ??? From a "kal vachomer", This ??? should bring himself ??? an oven For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because ??? No. become tamei ??? also No. ??? And the rabbbis ??? No. It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. ??? Rav Yosef son of Ami pointed out a contradiction. who changes ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Rav A sin-offering ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of an elevation-offering is invalid Perhaps, ??? of it ??? No. ??? of it For didn't Rav say A sin-offering ??? on who ??? An invalidated sin-offering on who ??? an elevation-offering is valid Perhaps, a thing ??? of it ??? No. ??? of it ??? there i.e., in another mishna (Lev. 4) ??? it ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says Consider this case: A sin-offering for the sake of a sin-offering. ??? Here in this case, ??? upon it it is written upon it and not on his fellow his fellow is equivalent that are his ??? atonement ??? Rav ??? pointed out a contradiction. who changes ??? And who said it? Rav A sin-offering ??? on who ??? is invalid on who ??? an elevation-offering ??? Perhaps, ??? of it Is this not ??? No. ??? of it For it was taught: ??? and not ??? even implements of ??? four ??? are written ??? one ??? and one ??? the value of one ??? of this and not ??? of after Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one ??? and not ??? and even implements of ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.