It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לא,א גמרא

now an olive's volume and an olive's volume ??? an olive's volume tomorrow outside ??? other than this an olive's volume tomorrow outside ??? an olive's volume an olive's volume ??? it was said: ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time Rabba said: ??? Pigul and Rav Hamnunah he said ??? you shall Rabba said: ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita an egg's volume he eats ??? and an egg's volume he eats two ??? this to that ??? this two and this two this one ??? had a vision you shall From where can you derive When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, stillborn lit., fallen this about himself. and this about himself. on a loaf of terumah ??? as one ??? the second and Rav Hamnunah he said there i.e., in another mishna that it is possible ??? Here in this case, there is not in this case. ??? Rav Hamnunah said ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita One who eats that became tamei, ??? that became tamei, ??? combine together this with that ??? Is this not even though ??? Perhaps that is not he returns ??? When Rav Dimi came he said ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time It was taught by bar-Kappara an invalidating act nevertheless yes. ??? olive tree ??? in a place an olive's volume For he came ??? he said ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place It was taught by bar-Kappara an invalidating act nevertheless yes. ??? olive tree ??? in a place an olive's volume Rav Ashi he would say over thus ??? olive tree with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time and an olive's volume ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time It was taught by bar-Kappara an invalidating act nevertheless yes. ??? olive tree ??? in a place an olive's volume he said Rabbi ??? dogs tomorrow an invalidating act nevertheless As it is written (II Kings 9) and ??? He disagreed with this Rabbi Ami Except I can object with text from here: ??? fire tomorrow As it is written (Job 20) ??? fire No. ??? So, here, ??? And if you say Here, too, For it was taught in a mishna: to eat ??? olive tree and to offer ??? an olive's volume is valid that do not food ??? combine together If it was ??? food So, here, Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? food ??? he is required Rav Ashi ??? to eat an olive's volume with two people What then? according to ??? do we go? That there are ??? or according to they eat do we go? there is not in this case. ??? Abayye said: Come and hear: to eat ??? olive tree and to offer ??? olive tree is valid that do not food ??? combine together

דף לא,ב גמרא

this one to eat and to eat is equivalent ??? and to offer and How so? with two people ??? Learn from this he is required Raba ??? to eat an olive's volume ??? What then? ??? that is high ??? for him or ??? for him Abayye said: Come and hear: to eat ??? olive tree and to offer ??? olive tree is valid that do not food ??? combine together The reason is ??? and to offer this one to eat and to eat ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he Perhaps ??? to eat ??? olive tree and to offer ??? olive tree ??? The reason is ??? and to offer this one to eat and to eat a thing whose way is not to eat ??? this one The tanna teaches: But the beginning of the teaching, to eat ??? to eat ??? ??? to eat yes. whose way is not did not say Rabbi ??? So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi Eliezer She for he said: "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? a person ??? An altar of ??? An altar of ??? a person For it was taught in a baraita ??? ??? to eat a thing whose way is not to eat and to offer a thing whose way is not to offer is valid and Rabbi Eliezer invalidates it Abaye said Even if you say rabbis and not you say this one to eat and to eat a thing whose way is not to eat except I would say this one to eat and to eat a thing ??? to eat And what can we come and learn from this? If it was a thing ??? to eat Come and learn from this. ??? Learn from this ??? olive tree outside ??? olive tree tomorrow is invalid, ??? olive tree tomorrow an invalidating act nevertheless ??? If it was to eat and to offer ??? that at the beginning of the teaching Learn from this to eat a thing ??? to eat yes. whose way is not to eat No. now for just as to eat and to eat a thing whose way is not to eat No. ??? to eat and to offer ??? to eat and to offer It is necessary to teach this ??? I thought to say there i.e., in another mishna he ??? For ??? But here, in this case, ??? For ??? For ??? I would say ??? Come and hear from this

דף לא,ב משנה

all ??? are slaughtered is valid ??? is valid ??? and even in the case of the holiest of holy offerings but only that did not have ??? in the case of the flesh. For this reason there are. invalidate it ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.