It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לד,א גמרא

??? breath Even ??? a thing in which there is in it ??? breath and if ??? breath who that it is possible except in cases regarding eating ??? should bring himself ??? who ate meat ??? Before the act of sprinkling, ??? tamei who ate meat ??? Before the act of sprinkling, ??? he said ??? And Rabbi Yochanan said: he does not ??? he said ??? in all ??? No. ??? there is no difference Before the act of sprinkling, and there is no difference After the act of sprinkling, Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: he does not ??? We come to compare ??? And so the writing of This certain individual After the act of sprinkling, If so, Let Scripture say ??? What then does it mean when it says in all ??? Learn from this both Back to the main body of the text: tamei who ate meat ??? Before the act of sprinkling, Reish Lakish: he said ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: he does not ??? Abayye said: It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? meat the words of all are ??? For scripture said: (Lev. 7) ??? pieces of wood frankincense ??? My son, food ??? and even thus ??? he read And Rabba said It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? meat the words of all are he does not ??? What is the reason? immediately that is not ??? of him. (Lev. 7) ??? upon it ??? No. ??? of him. (Lev. 7) ??? who ??? in all tamei does not eat For didn't Master, say ??? pieces of wood frankincense Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? in a vessel ??? all ??? For it was taught in a baraita all in which there is to him ??? Watch out for leading vav And anything that does not have a process that grants such permission ??? in a vessel it was said: ??? livestock that is tamei atop על גבי the altar of ??? he said ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: he does not ??? he said ??? that is tahor yes. that is tamei No. Is this not that comes from this general principle it would follow One who acts ??? upon it And Rabbi Yochanan said: yes. ??? upon it Is this not that comes from this general principle it would follow One who acts yes. ??? upon it ??? Rabbi ??? (Lev. 11) it ??? and not livestock that is tamei Is this not that comes from this general principle it would follow One who acts One who acts He said to him Rabbi Ya'akov to Rabbi ??? son of ??? to you ??? livestock that is tamei everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? So, too, here, it was said: Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: transgresses a "Do this" i.e., a positive commandment ??? he said he does not transgresses ??? anything Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: transgresses a "Do this" i.e., a positive commandment livestock yes. raw lit., living No. ??? he said he does not transgresses upon it ??? anything This certain individual ??? Raba Watch out for leading vav !! And even it is said (Lev. 1) sacrifice to Hashem livestock I was says raw lit., living are in the general category livestock In the same essential way as it is said (Deut. 14) this ??? who ??? ox ??? a ram and a deer etc. Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 1) mornings ??? mornings ??? Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not raw lit., living It is possible No. ??? but if it has been brought, is valid this one For what reason this ??? who said to him his rabbi; that comes for me ??? to him ??? that is not ??? on his words except ??? on his words and is valid Therefore, scripture states: mornings ??? mornings ??? Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not raw lit., living this one For what reason this ??? who said to him his rabbi; to ??? for me except ??? to him ??? that is not ??? on his words except ??? on his words

דף לד,ב גמרא

is invalid, ??? he expounds. ??? and all of them ??? ??? brought this very question Yochanan is invalid, What then? ??? He said to him: yes. makes ??? except Outside its designated time or outside its designated place Because ??? Rav ??? he would say over thus ??? brought this very question Yochanan a cup is invalid, What then? ??? He said to him: is invalid, ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? to you If it was he renders things invalid ??? a cup is invalid, also ??? If it was is invalid, No. ??? a cup is invalid, also No. ??? Rav ??? he would say over thus Abaye brought this very question ??? a cup What then? ??? his fellow ??? or ??? He said to him: ??? of Rabbi ??? Shimon And the rabbbis as it is taught: is more he says (Lev. 4) ??? to the bottom he says (Lev. 4) and all of its blood ??? from where do we learn ??? of its blood ??? and gave One presentation of the blood from this One presentation of the blood from this ??? Therefore, scripture states: and all of its blood ??? It is possible he gave four presentations ??? one ??? all of them ??? Therefore, scripture states: and ??? How so? he ??? there are. ??? Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon says from where do we learn ??? of its blood ??? and gave four presentations ??? one ??? Therefore, scripture states: and all of its blood ??? For it is written and ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? This certain individual ??? and gave ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard is invalid, then I might incorrectly say: What then does it mean when it says is invalid, tamei ??? but: ??? No. and if we had heard ??? is what he has ??? by day ??? but: implements of weekday No. and if we had heard implements of weekday It is because of this: ??? but: ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this ??? for him ??? Ravina said to Rav Ashi: Thus said Rav ??? in the name of Raba So, with whom does it agree? ??? he the one who does not have ??? as it is taught: ??? says Even if blood ??? sends his fellow ??? to him Rav Ashi said: all ??? shall not be ??? Rav said ??? of Rav ??? one ??? for him is what he has ??? Rabbi Yehudah For it was taught in a baraita And furthermore, Rabbi Yehuda said ??? the blood ??? did he die ??? the blood ??? for him for he said: all ??? shall not be ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Yehudah says a single cup he was ??? One opposite the foundation Learn from this all ??? shall not be ??? Learn from this Back to the main body of the text: It was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says a single cup he was ??? one from them Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found that he was ??? They said to him: to Rabbi Yehudah Is it not the case that No. ??? in a vessel ??? except lest No. ??? in a vessel He said to them:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.