It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לה,א גמרא

Even I do not say except ??? in a vessel This is only in the case ??? know priests ??? Is it not the case that blood ??? in it Rabbi Yehudah with his reasoning for he said: blood ??? a seminal emission blood as it is taught: blood ??? Rabbi Yehudah says ??? For didn't R' Elazar say give thanks Rabbi Yehudah in the matter of atonement that is not atones as it is said (Deut. 12) ??? the blood he ??? the blood he ??? blood ??? in it ??? blood that do not ??? in it yes. ??? blood except Rabbi Yehudah with his reasoning for he said: yes. blood nullify blood He said to them: Rabbi Yehudah ??? For what reason ??? They said to him: praise he to the children of ??? until ??? with blood Hey, isn't it the case that blood you shall ??? he and shall not be ??? For it was taught in a baraita the blood ??? and the honey ??? dried ones ??? moist ones yes. ??? And then it happened that ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: they were ??? and a slave ??? is invalid And if you say ??? them For it was taught: (Lev. 6) ??? that did not have ??? or in the case that one is not ??? Abraham ??? the blessing of the Service She and not For it was taught: (Lev. 1) and he sacrificed ??? The entirety -- this refers to ??? Abraham ??? except ??? pieces of wood ??? the blessing of the Service She ??? in what way does ???

דף לה,א משנה

??? ??? to eat a thing whose way is not to eat and to offer a thing whose way is not to offer is valid and Rabbi Eliezer invalidates it to eat a thing ??? to eat and to offer a thing ??? to offer less than an olive's volume is valid to eat ??? olive tree and to offer ??? olive tree is valid that do not food ??? combine together ??? ??? to eat an olive's volume from ??? and from ??? and from ??? and from ??? and from ??? and from ??? and from ??? and from ??? Outside its designated time or outside its designated place is valid and we do not become guilty on their account It is because of this: pigul, notar, and tamei ??? ??? to eat ??? or ??? outside No. ??? ??? to eat ??? outside No. ??? milk ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and we do not become guilty on their account It is because of this: pigul, notar, and tamei

דף לה,א גמרא

Rabbi Eliezer said ??? No. ??? No. ??? offal ??? in the case of their offal ??? No. ??? Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: ??? he did not do anything at all. Is this not this one ??? No.

דף לה,ב גמרא

this one ??? in the case of their offal ??? Come and hear: Bulls that are burnt And goats that are burnt We apply the laws of misappropriation to them from the moment of their being declared holy. ??? Subject to disqualification, in the case of a tevul yom one who has already immersed in a mikveh but remains tamei until nightfall ??? or by sitting overnight, Is this not ??? meat so learn from this ??? Watch out for leading vav !! or by sitting overnight, ??? of it ??? No. ??? this one When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, all of them We apply the laws of misappropriation to them on the house of ??? until ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching ??? meat something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has But the beginning of the teaching, ??? and at the end of the teaching, meat ??? and these that do not ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? wool ??? and the gate ??? ??? and milk ??? No. ??? and not ??? and we do not become guilty on their account It is because of this: pigul, notar, and tamei ??? from them outside is exempt Is this not No. ??? and not ??? zevach-offering No. No. ??? ??? and not ??? this one it is taught at the end all of them No. ??? and not ??? this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, why do I have ??? we are not guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, why do I have except ??? who seeks ??? notar and tamei a Tanna taught: an invalidating act nevertheless Here in this case, also, ??? who seeks ??? from them outside a Tanna taught: also and all of them No. ??? and not ??? Rava said: Even We also ??? ??? to eat ??? or ??? outside No. ??? ??? to eat ??? outside No. ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had It was taught by milk ??? He is not liable about them It is because of this: pigul, notar, and tamei this one ??? are obligated except Is this not Learn from this here, ??? here, ??? It was taught there: ??? Rabbi Akiva considers it proper ??? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said No. ??? Rabbi Akiva except ??? Because and are kosher ??? This is only in the case ??? ??? Chiyya son of ??? give thanks Rabbi Akiva ??? female ??? he is equivalent. He challenged this "He" meaning... Rabbi Zeira ??? from them outside is exempt this one ??? he is liable And how It concerns itself ??? female If you say, This is satisfactory his reasoning is Rabbi Akiva ??? female if is credited lit, rises No. ??? So, with whom does it agree? Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva except If you say, if is credited lit, rises ??? So, with whom does it agree? I would say ??? from them outside is exempt this one ??? he is liable Hey, isn't it the case that from them The tanna teaches: ??? is equivalent ??? except I would say ??? outside is exempt this one ??? he is liable

דף לה,ב משנה

??? in order ??? ??? or ??? tomorrow or ??? outwards Rabbi Yehudah invalidates it and the sages validate it ??? atop ??? that did not have opposite the foundation and to give ??? to the bottom and ??? to the bottom ??? and ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.