It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לו,א משנה

inside outside and ??? outside inside ??? ??? the Paschal offering to eat from him please, ??? with blood ??? is valid that do not ??? except outside ??? and with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place and the Paschal offering ??? that did not have ???

דף לו,א גמרא

What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rabbi Yehudah Rabbi Eliezer said two ??? are written ??? It is written one says (Ex. 12) No. ??? from him until mornings and It is written one says (Lev. 7) No. Watch out for leading vav !! and he shall place from him until mornings if he does not one topic ??? in the matter of ??? And Rabbi Yehudah This he read ??? he who has arrived This should bring himself to account for that which was taught (Lev. 7) meat zevach-offering ??? we have learned ??? for a day and a night ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: meat A sin-offering and a guilt-offering from where do we learn Scripture states: zevach-offering And from where do we learn ??? a Nazir ??? Passover Scripture states: ??? a thangkgiving-offering ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: its sacrifice all of them reads I of them No. Watch out for leading vav !! and he shall place If so, Let Scripture say No. ??? What then does it mean when it says No. Watch out for leading vav !! and he shall place if he does not one topic ??? one topic ??? to discharge the mitzvah What is there to say? And furthermore, The reason is with R' Yehudah reason out the logic. he as it is taught: He said to them: Rabbi Yehudah If it was "You "We thank..." ??? tomorrow it is invalid. Even ??? tomorrow is invalid, except The reason is of Rabbi Yehudah reason out the logic. he ??? also Rabbi Yehudah in all of them ??? the Paschal offering and to eat from him please, ??? who ??? ??? who ??? ??? who ??? other than this all ??? their blood with blood ??? Rabbi Yehudah with his reasoning for he said: yes. blood nullify blood to give ??? is more to the bottom to the bottom is more Rabbi Yehudah with his reasoning for he said: that did not have to his place also ??? of him. ??? inside ??? outside ??? outside ??? inside his reasoning is Rabbi Yehudah in the case of a place that it should be ??? with blood in the case of the flesh. and in the case of their offal and who it has to Rabbi Yehudah This reason out the logic. For it was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says (Deut. 17) a thing evil" ??? here, A sin-offering ??? and A sin-offering ??? of its blood within is invalid ??? to Rabbi Yehudah the third For it was taught in a mishna: Rabbi Yehuda said He brought in in error is valid this one with intent is invalid, ??? now for just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? If it was ??? yes. If it was No. ??? No. Here in this case, ??? is it not all the more so? it is a case of two different Tanaaim and who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah reasoned R' Yehudah A sin-offering ???

דף לו,ב גמרא

??? he is liable For it was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says It is possible A sin-offering ??? he is liable Scripture states: (in Deut. 16) No. ??? to Hashem ??? ox ??? etc. any thing evil" on a thing evil" you ??? and if you ??? on A sin-offering ??? it is a case of two different Tanaaim who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah he said Rabbi Abba give thanks Rabbi Yehudah ??? Rabba said: Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: ??? Before the act of sprinkling, No. anything he and it comes to ??? to it ??? and not She there i.e., in another mishna he one ??? She Here in this case, two ??? Rav Huna to Rabbi Abba to give ??? is more to the bottom to the bottom is more ??? is valid ??? had a vision with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. tomorrow is invalid, ??? had a vision between with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time between with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, ??? Rabbi Abba ??? Rav Chisdah said Ravina said son of ??? tomorrow he is liable Rabba said: Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: ??? Before the act of sprinkling, No. Look, And so ??? of him. ??? and not She there i.e., in another mishna he could sprinkle ??? Here in this case, No. ??? A general principle: Rav Chisdah said ??? of Rav ??? son of ??? meat Passover that did not have ??? a thangkgiving-offering that did not have ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? Rabba said: Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: as it is taught: (Lev. 7) who to Hashem ??? The offal of simple offerings ??? Perhaps, even though ??? My son, food ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? Here in this case, also, even though ??? My son, food ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? and not She there i.e., in another mishna The offal of simple offerings they saw ??? To exclude meat Passover that did not have ??? a thangkgiving-offering that did not have ??? that is not they saw No. ??? and not ??? other than this this one ??? No. they saw and not She ??? they saw ??? and Behold! No. they saw ???

דף לו,ב משנה

The academy of Shammai say: all ??? on the outside altar ??? as a gift One ??? and the case is that of a sin-offering, two presentations but the academy of Hillel say: Even A sin-offering that was given One presentation of the blood ??? For this reason if he gave ??? and ??? except ??? and if he gave ??? except ??? and ??? except ??? an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. all ??? on the altar of ??? One from ??? it is as if No. ??? For this reason he gave all of them ??? and one that which was not according to the correct process is invalid And there is not the penalty of excision,

דף לו,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: from where do we learn ??? on the outside altar ??? as a gift One ??? Therefore, scripture states: (Deut. 12) ??? and that one ??? he who has arrived This should bring himself to account for that which was taught

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.