It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ד,א גמרא

From where do we derive this? ??? For scripture said: (Lev. 3) and if zevach-offering peace-offerings its sacrifice that it should be ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? and perhaps, we were ??? From the fact that it is written (Lev. 7) ??? blood ??? (Lev. 7) ??? blood ??? and not it is written zevach-offering and here in this other case, it is written zevach-offering Learn from this that it should be ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings ??? the remainder of ??? From where do we derive this? And if you say ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? that did not have for the sake of lit. in the name of they eat on Passover except Scripture states: ??? blood ??? that it should be ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings and let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? It is because of this: That there are ??? Just as ??? which provides is invalid ??? and the woman ??? From where do we derive this? And if you say ??? from those Just as ??? which provides ??? north ??? except Scripture states: ??? blood ??? that it should be ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings and let the Merciful One write in the Torah Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified ??? It is because of this: That there are ??? Just as ??? which provides he is liable upon it ??? death ??? all of them ??? From where do we derive this? And if you say ??? Just as ??? which provides the blessing of the Service where it is not possible ??? shall you say ??? where it is possble ??? except Scripture states: (Lev. 1) and he sacrificed The entirety ??? and Mar said: -- this refers to ??? Abraham ??? and it was taught: (Lev. 1) and bring offerings -- this refers to ??? the blood ??? the Merciful One ??? This comes to imply ??? No. ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? From where do we derive this? Rav said ??? the son of of Rav Ami Scripture states: (Lev. 7) meat zevach-offering ??? that it should be ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of a thangkgiving-offering if he does not one topic ??? to us from there ??? one topic ??? and that one ??? he who has arrived this one should bring himself to account for that which was taught meat zevach-offering ??? Abba ??? says It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer came to teach a thangkgiving-offering ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings is valid peace-offerings ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of a thangkgiving-offering is invalid Just as ??? between this to this a thangkgiving-offering ??? peace-offerings And there is no meaning to the word peace-offerings ??? a thangkgiving-offering We An altar of we say it. ??? should bring himself A sin-offering and a guilt-offering from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: zevach-offering If so, ??? he read meat ??? What then does it mean when it says zevach-offering Learn from this both ??? the remainder of ??? From where do we derive this? And if you say ??? Just as ??? which provides invalidates it that did not have for the sake of lit. in the name of they eat on Passover ??? ??? Just as ??? No. ??? between ??? Even ??? No. ??? of them between ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides is invalid ??? in four, ??? after death ??? (in the case of a community offering) ???

דף ד,ב גמרא

and even though ??? This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ both from this ??? what is the difference here, who changes ??? that is not you shall ??? in reality who changes ??? also ??? in reality he except immediately ??? So, here, immediately ??? and for Rav, ??? the son of of Rav ??? for he said: there are who changes ??? after death both from this that it is possible ??? except Rav Ashi said Scripture states: (Lev. 1) ??? to him ??? upon it and not on his fellow and that one ??? he who has arrived This should bring himself to account for that which was taught ??? to him ??? upon it Rabbi Shimon says: ??? he is liable ??? and that is not upon it he is not liable ??? And Rav says Isaac son of ??? What is the reason? immediately for he said: by the like who ??? for him ??? he is equivalent. Rav Ashi ??? to him ??? From where do we derive this? And if you say ??? Just as ??? which provides the blessing of the Service ??? upon it outside except Rav Ashi said We come to compare ??? a Nazir As it is written (Num. 6) and ??? may he do it? zevach-offering peace-offerings that it should be ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings and if he does not one topic ??? for him from there ??? one topic ??? He said to him: Rav Acha son of Abba to Raba I would say may he do it? A general principle: zevach-offering creates an exclusion A general principle: and creates an exclusion yes. are in the general category except Just as ??? yes. something other than this No. If it was it is written may he do it? peace-offerings zevach-offering ??? now As it is written may he do it? zevach-offering peace-offerings it was. for him A general principle: that is not fill and all A general principle: that is not fill yes. ??? that specific are in the general category and creates an exclusion Ravina he said In reality lit: In the world ??? to Hashem and A general principle: had a vision He said to him: Rav Acha ??? Hey, isn't it the case that No. he is equivalent. ??? that came first ??? that was last ??? that came first ??? And naught else ??? that was last all to Hashem and even ??? this one It was taught in the academy of Rabbi Yishmael, ??? he expounds. For This ??? A general principle: and creates an exclusion and A general principle: If it was you ??? except similar to ??? Just as ??? the blessing of the Service and in the case of ??? Even all the blessing of the Service and in the case of ??? If it was Just as ??? the blessing of the Service and we are guilty on its account outside Even all the blessing of the Service and we are guilty on its account outside ??? yes. ??? No. So, too, Just as ??? a thing ??? north ??? Even all ??? north ??? yes. ??? No. that it is possible to say thus and there are to say thus ??? there are. And they went --- ??? other than this and one one The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. ??? If you wish, I would say ??? a ram a Nazir the remainder of peace-offerings From where do we derive this? And if you say let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? a Nazir Just as ??? a Nazir which provides there are with them ??? others If so, ??? What then does it mean when it says peace-offerings ??? all peace-offerings ??? peace-offerings the remainder of all holy offerings From where do we derive this? And if you say let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? except Scripture states: (Lev. 7) this the Torah ??? ??? the scripture ??? Just as peace-offerings between who changes ??? between who changes ??? in the case of ??? Even all between who changes ??? between who changes ??? in the case of ??? I would say in a case ??? them that did not have ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 23) "one who finds" ??? and You did as it was ??? etc. This ??? he ??? if how much ??? you did ??? And if not, ??? and It is necessary to teach this "one who finds" ??? and It is necessary to teach this this the Torah For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: "one who finds" ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.