It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מב,א גמרא

but: ??? on the altar of ??? For example, forty and three of Yom Kippur and one ten of A bull a priest Messiah and one ten of A bull ??? a thing of ??? between in the first, or whether in the second or whether ??? Rabbi Meir says: an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. But the sages say: Watch out for leading vav And there is not the penalty of excision, until ??? in all the releasing The tanna teaches: from this ??? between in the first, between in the second between ??? Rav said Isaac son of Avin: Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? permits he If so, What is the reason? is a law established by the Rabbis Rabba said: one the sages Rabbi Eliezer She For it was taught in a baraita The fistful of a meal-offering the frankincense the incense the meal-offering of the priests the meal-offering of the anointed priest and the meal-offering associated with a libation ??? from them an olive's volume outside he is liable and R' Eliezer exempts until ??? all of them For didn't Raba say give thanks Rabbi Eliezer with its monetary value? For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Eliezer and R' Shimon say ??? where he interrupted From here he ??? except Rabba said: For example, ??? in the first, ??? in the second and he returned ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that on the understanding of the first he ??? why do I have Come and learn from this. He disagreed with this Rav Ashi something ??? The tanna teaches: except Rav Ashi said Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? in the first, and in the second ??? What would you have said? Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that Anyone who does on the understanding of the first he makes he turned ??? in all one and one why do I have Come and hear from this

דף מב,ב גמרא

Hey, isn't it the case that between between The tanna teaches: it is a problem Mar said: Rabbi Meir says: an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. ??? he is spiritually cut off No. ??? until ??? all ??? As Mar said: ??? is valid thus in the same way ??? is invalid, Just as ??? is valid until ??? all ??? Even ??? is invalid, until ??? all ??? Hey, isn't it the case that immediately ??? of him. inside is invalid like who that is not ??? he is equivalent. For he returns ??? in reality he that he came ??? Rabbah said It concerns itself ??? Rava said: even you say ??? one and a male goat one ??? forty and three and this was taught! forty "satisfied" this one like who for he said: we make an eruv ??? Hey, isn't it the case that like who for he said: yes. we make an eruv ??? and this was taught! forty ??? this one like who for he said: ??? this one like who for he said: yes. ??? They challenged him from this teaching: Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? implements of ??? but: he came ??? he gave The fistful of a meal-offering ??? and Watch out for leading vav the frankincense ??? or ??? The fistful of a meal-offering ??? and Watch out for leading vav the frankincense ??? Rabbi Meir says: an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. But the sages say: Watch out for leading vav And there is not the penalty of excision, until ??? in all the releasing The tanna teaches: from this The fistful of a meal-offering ??? and Watch out for leading vav the frankincense ??? I would say Already he gave Watch out for leading vav the frankincense ??? one ??? But the beginning of the teaching, And furthermore, This was taught and after this it is a problem

דף מב,ב משנה

and these items that do not they are obligated upon them It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless The fistful of a meal-offering ??? the frankincense

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.