It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מד,א גמרא

if No. ??? I was says on ??? this one ??? in going from justice. to be ??? he said ??? did he die and thus he comes to say Watch out for leading vav !! And even it is said ??? and it is said tithe and terumah and not ??? did he die I was says ??? on ??? and on ??? on ??? also on ??? Anything that has a process that grants permission for it to be used by the priests or placed on the altar between to a person between ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? The rabbis taught: Or perhaps, sends except ??? Just as peace-offerings ??? they are eaten for two days and one night Even all is eaten for two days and one night is eaten for a day and a night from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: ??? all ??? they are eaten an elevation-offering that do not ??? they are eaten from where do we learn Therefore, scripture states: zevach-offering from where do we learn ??? and The menuchot offerings: until that I ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at Therefore, scripture states: (Lev. 22) who are these ??? for me and comes notar ??? from tumah and comes an invalidating act nevertheless iniquity iniquity ??? and based on this lit: from after, ??? any thing why is it said peace-offerings From here, to say to you Just as peace-offerings ??? in which they have permit between to a person between ??? Even Anything that has a process that grants permission for it to be used by the priests or placed on the altar between to a person between ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? The elevation-offering of its blood permits ??? and Awake, to the priests An elevation-offering of a bird: of its blood permits ??? A sin-offering of a bird: of its blood permits ??? to the priests Bulls that are burnt And goats that are burnt ??? permits ??? and sends forth I The fistful of a meal-offering and Watch out for leading vav the frankincense ??? the meal-offering of the priests the meal-offering of the anointed priest and the meal-offering associated with a libation and the blood Rabbi Shimon says: Just as peace-offerings ??? in which there is in it on the outside altar but we are guilty on its account Even all ??? on the outside altar we are guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless they have fulfilled the mitzvah Bulls that are burnt And goats that are burnt Because that do not on the outside altar ??? we are not guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? first-born ??? for two days and one night in what way will come If it was a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? that are ??? except ??? shall eat Behold! two ??? Rabba said: ??? in the west in all places where you finds two ??? this to this ??? creates an exclusion among them ??? are in the general category ??? until that I ??? oil of ??? So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi Meir She as it is taught: ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at we are guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless these are the words of Rabbi Meir I would say at the end of the teaching, and sends forth I the meal-offering associated with a libation and the blood ??? According to the sages, as it is taught: ??? livestock we are guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless because of ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir They said to him: Is it not the case that a person sends ??? the day ??? until ten days He said to them: Even I do not say except ??? with ??? Rav Yosef said So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi She for he said: ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at ??? for him ??? for him ??? for him as it is taught: ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at the offering is subject to the laws of misappropriation. until ??? the blood ??? the blood benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. Rabbi says they are subject to the laws of misappropriation until that one give ??? they agree that he is forbidden in cases regarding eating until that one give the giving of "satisfied" and the giving of ??? in front of Rabbi ??? he said a person Raba ??? Joseph Let us say, This is like the validity

דף מד,ב גמרא

Behold! ??? alone by itself ??? for him and not ??? for him as it is taught: ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at we are guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless because of ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. They said to him: According to Rabbi Meir, Is it not the case that a person sends ??? now ??? and until ten days He said to them: Even I do not say except ??? with ??? except Thus said Rabbi ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? She ??? Abayye said: In reality lit: In the world No. ??? and it was taught ??? that comes with ??? and it is the law ??? those who are coming back with ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had a Tanna taught: ??? those who are coming back before ??? and it is the law ??? that comes before ??? A sin-offering of a bird: of its blood permits ??? From where do we derive this? for it teaches: Levi (in Numbers 18) all ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at You might have thought that I would say that from the fire Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: and that one Is this not is permitted. from the fire he ??? (in Numbers 18) for all ??? Minchah-offering of ??? and Minchah-offering of ??? You might have thought that I would say that (Ex. 29) and he ate ??? who ??? at them." and Minchah-offering of ??? We come to compare and Minchah-offering of ??? iniquity ??? for all ??? A sin-offering of a bird: You might have thought that I would say that roadkill ??? for all ??? a guilt-offering a Nazir and a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at You might have thought that I would say that ??? Come and learn from this. a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at clearly and explicitly it is written of him. except ??? a guilt-offering a Nazir ??? who ??? this ??? to you he ??? it shall be even ??? in it the his wife It was taught: R' Elazar says It is because of this: Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean ??? In the matter ??? outside ??? In the matter ??? inside No. ??? How so? He was standing outside and he said Behold, I am slaughtering ??? tomorrow No. ??? outside In the matter ??? inside No. ??? He was standing inside and he said ??? from this in order to offer ??? tomorrow No. ??? inside In the matter ??? outside but: He was standing outside and he said Behold, I am slaughtering ??? tomorrow or to offer ??? tomorrow ??? outside In the matter ??? outside R' Yehoshua ben Levi said: What then does it mean when it says he read (Lev. 4) as it was ??? zevach-offering ??? And so Just as we have learned ??? zevach-offering ??? From here, except There is an analogy between A bull a priest Messiah ??? zevach-offering ??? Just as ox zevach-offering ??? until ??? on the outside altar Even A bull a priest Messiah until ??? on the altar of ??? Rav Nachman said Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said The halacha is like Rabbi ??? who said it in the name of Rabbi Yosei Rabba said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.