It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מה,א גמרא

Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? He said to him Abaye Except I can object with text from here: all ??? holy offerings No. So let him teach Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? he except ??? the reward for So, here, ??? the reward for thus ??? to you Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion why do I have ??? other than this He said to him The halacha is ???

דף מה,א משנה

my sanctity some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles Watch out for leading vav !! and we do not become guilty on their account It is because of this: pigul, notar, and tamei ??? outside is exempt these are the words of Rabbi Shimon Rabbi Yosei he is obligated

דף מה,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught my sanctity some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. and we do not become guilty on their account It is because of this: pigul, notar, and tamei And we do not make substitute offerings? And there is no meaning to the word bring in ??? but: ??? required ??? these are the words of Rabbi Shimon he said Rabbi Yosei one who sees I in all of them ??? as it is said of them to Hashem In what matters are we saying this? ??? An altar of but: ??? the house they are subject to the laws of misappropriation ??? benefit may not be derived from them, and not ??? benefit may not be derived from them, According to Rabbinic law, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. ??? the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? it is written the Children of Israel and not some texts read: worshippers of stars ??? but we do not become guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless notar ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? an invalidating act nevertheless iniquity iniquity ??? and comes notar ??? from tumah ??? it is written the Children of Israel and not some texts read: worshippers of stars ??? And we do not make ??? What is the reason? ??? substitute offerings? for tithing animals ??? livestock ??? grain ??? grain it is written the Children of Israel and not some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles And so a thing ??? he returns This teaches ??? tithe grain Those who are ill he This is satistfactory for one for he said: according to This teaches do we go? except ??? according to teach do we go? What is there to say? except tithe livestock guilt-obligation that do not ??? to it time he and guilt-obligation that it does not have time ??? Israel ??? some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles No. ??? And there is no meaning to the word bring in ??? The rabbis taught: (Num. 15) ??? sends ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? sends ??? It is possible she will not be ??? require ??? Scripture states: ??? he said Rabbi Yosei one who sees I in all of them ??? In what matters are we saying this? ??? An altar of ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא his reasoning is For ??? the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? is equivalent ??? the sanctity of ??? but: the sanctity of ??? the house ??? No. The Rabbis taught blood that became tamei, ??? in error ???

דף מה,ב גמרא

with intent No. ??? In what matters are we saying this? privately but: (in the case of a community offering) between in error between with intent ??? between in error or whether with intent No. ??? rabbis in front of Rav ??? like who that is not like Rabbi Yosi For if it was Rabbi Yosei Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't in all of them say I one who sees ??? He said to them Rav ??? Even if you say Rabbi Yosei It is different there in that case For scripture said: to them to them and not some texts read: to the worshippers of the stars some texts say: to gentiles He said to him: Rav Huna the son of of Rav he gave for Rav, ??? Except I can object with text from here: (Lev. 22) who are these ??? So, here, are these and not some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles except Rav Ashi said Scripture states: (Ex. 28) ??? to them ??? Is this not My son, ???

דף מה,ב משנה

items that do not are obligated upon them It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless we are guilty on its account It is because of this: notar but on account of tamei except for the blood R' Shimon he is obligated In the matter whose ways to eat but: ??? the frankincense the incense we are not guilty on its account It is because of this: ???

דף מה,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught It is possible No. ??? they are obligated It is because of this: ??? except on a thing in which there is to him permit between to a person between ??? It would be a logical inference for just as an invalidating act nevertheless that he was ??? One and not ??? we are not guilty on its account except on a thing in which there is to him permit between to a person between ??? that it the case is that of an elevation-offering, and descends ??? is it not logical that is not he is liable except on a thing in which there is to him permit between to a person between ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 22) who are these ??? for me It is possible immediately Scripture states: (Lev. 22) ??? he said ??? And so there are ??? that he was he is liable except Just as Scripture states: ??? is what the scripture says. How so? he has permit ??? permit he (permit) does not have ??? in a vessel ??? notar From where do we derive this? will come ??? from tumah ??? iniquity iniquity ??? from tumah you shall for him ??? which provides ??? a sign of ??? it was. for him ??? which provides notar ??? tahor at a time i.e., in a case was sacrificed and Behold! ??? except ??? Levi for it teaches: Levi from where do we learn ??? time is what the scripture says. Scripture states: (Lev. 22) and not ??? ??? My son, ??? my sanctity who are these ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.