It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מו,א גמרא

with two ??? is what the scripture says. one is invalid, notar and one is invalid, ??? except for the blood ??? From where do we derive this? Ulla said Scripture states: (Lev. 17) and as for me, ??? to you ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael a Tanna taught: Scripture states: (Lev. 17) ??? and not ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: Scripture states: (Lev. 17) he he before atonement ??? atonement Just as after atonement they do not have the laws of misappropriation. Even before atonement they do not have the laws of misappropriation. I would say after atonement ??? atonement Just as before atonement there are in it the laws of misappropriation of sacred things Even after atonement there are in it the laws of misappropriation of sacred things yes. to you a thing ??? the offering is subject to the laws of misappropriation. and not Consider this case: terumah of ??? It is because of this: that there is terumah of ??? and Priestly garments two ??? those who are coming back ??? and all two the Writings those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? This is satistfactory According to the sages, that they said (Lev. 16) ??? in that place This teaches ??? except to Rabbi ??? for he said: are permitted there are. ??? but only that did not have He shall make use of them ??? after What is there to say? It is because of this: that there is terumah of ??? two ??? those who are coming back ??? and all two ??? those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? This is satistfactory for one for he said: yes. ??? except for one for he said: ??? What is there to say? two ??? are written Here in this case, it is written (Deut. 21) ??? and there it is written (Lev. 6) was his name three ??? with blood why do I have ??? and from tumah but: an invalidating act nevertheless It is not necessary he read For it was taught in a baraita Anything that has a process that grants permission for it to be used by the priests or placed on the altar between to a person between ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless ??? permits he Rabbi Yochanan said: three ??? For what reason

דף מו,ב גמרא

One ??? and one ??? and one ??? those that are not they are eaten and to Rebbi Shimon for he said: items that do not they are eaten yes. they are obligated upon them It is because of this: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? sin-offerings ??? I thought to say Because and Rabbi Shimon said: all that is not on the outside altar ??? we are not guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless It is because of this: ??? also No. ??? R' Shimon he is obligated ??? to eat ??? it was said: Rabbi Yochanan ??? Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yosei, the son of Rabbi Chanina one ??? and one ??? One says It is a disagreement ??? meat but: ??? the words of all are he does not ??? and one says ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? What is the reason? immediately ??? of him. (Lev. 7) ??? who ??? in all tamei we recite of him. (Lev. 7) ??? upon it Rav ??? he would say over thus Rav Kahana he would say over thus one ??? and one ??? One says It is a disagreement ??? but: ??? meat the words of all are ??? and one says ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? Rabba said: ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? What is the reason? immediately that is not ??? of him. ??? upon it ??? No. we recite of him. ??? who ??? in all tamei does not eat For didn't Master, say ??? pieces of wood frankincense ??? in reality

דף מו,ב משנה

for the sake of lit. in the name of Six items ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of zevach-offering for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of the Name for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Watch out for leading vav he sinned he said Rabbi Yosei Even who that did not have he was in his heart for the sake of lit. in the name of one from all these is valid that he was ??? a court that do not ??? except after ???

דף מו,ב גמרא

Rav Yehudah said Rav said an elevation-offering for the sake of lit. in the name of an elevation-offering To exclude for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings that is not ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? To exclude ??? that is not ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? To exclude Abraham ??? that is not for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said Abraham ??? They do not have It is because of this: ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? wind of to Hashem for the sake of lit. in the name of who who said and it was the case that the world. Rav Yehudah said Rav said A sin-offering ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of an elevation-offering is invalid for the sake of lit. in the name of Those who are ill is valid R' Eliezer said What is the reason מאי טעמא of Rav (Lev. 22) and not ??? my sanctity the Children of Israel holy offerings ??? holy offerings And there is no meaning to the word Those who are ill ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rava said: Rabbi Yosei Even who that did not have he was in his heart for the sake of lit. in the name of one from all these is valid that he was ??? a court בית דין The reason is that did not have he was in his heart A general principle: this one he was in his heart for the sake of lit. in the name of Those who are ill is invalid, He said to him Abaye Perhaps No. he was A general principle: is valid ??? this one he was in his heart for the sake of lit. in the name of Those who are ill is valid and does not ??? R' Elazar said A sin-offering ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Those who are ill is valid It is because of this: Those who are ill is invalid ??? of him Shmuel ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.