It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ה,א גמרא

No. know in what way Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: this the Torah and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: this the Torah then I might incorrectly say: ??? Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: "one who finds" ??? pointed out a contradiction. ??? on ??? among ??? if are proper are these ??? and if yes. try to calm For what reason have come He said to him: R' Eliezer ??? after death that are are proper And there is no meaning to the word try to calm For it was taught in a baraita the his wife ??? ??? No. ??? He said to him ??? to you the case is that of an elevation-offering, That it comes after death a guilt-offering that is not will come after death From where do we derive this? He said to him Behold! ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: Even ??? he said ??? upon it a person The greatness he ??? I ??? and is what you say? Do you really mean that? for me R' Eliezer except Raysh Lakish said ??? I ??? (Deut. 23) "one who finds" ??? etc. This ??? he etc. ??? Rabbi Zeira And Rabbi Isaac son of Abba ??? Abaye ??? has a problem ??? a guilt-offering that is not will come after death He used the wording to it ??? "one who finds" ??? I would say that comes ??? he shall take and not ??? a guilt-offering No. he shall take A general principle: He said to them Abaye ??? from here he opens (Lev. 4) ??? it ??? it ??? is valid that did not have ??? is invalid this one the remainder of holy offerings that did not have ??? kosher It is possible ??? Scripture states: "one who finds" ??? and so go ahead and say that comes ??? he shall take and not ??? a guilt-offering ??? also ??? Abayye said: a guilt-offering ??? No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? the highest for just as an elevation-offering that is not ??? It is not ??? a guilt-offering ??? is it not logical that is not ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? peace-offerings ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? an elevation-offering ??? and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them that are holy offerings ??? that did not have ??? kosher And there is no meaning to the word try to calm Even I ??? a guilt-offering that he was ??? that did not have ??? is valid and does not ??? Just as ??? regarding them which provides ??? (in the case of a community offering) a thangkgiving-offering ???

דף ה,ב גמרא

Just as ??? which provides require bread an elevation-offering and peace-offerings ??? and he returned justice. No. ??? this ??? this and not ??? this ??? this one thing is equivalent regarding them that are holy offerings ??? that did not have ??? is valid and does not ??? Even I ??? a guilt-offering that he was and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? that did not have ??? is valid and does not ??? Just as ??? regarding them that are have come ??? except Rabba said: this the Torah etc. ??? the scripture ??? Just as peace-offerings that are holy offerings ??? that did not have ??? are proper And there is no meaning to the word try to calm Even I ??? a guilt-offering that he was ??? etc. What then does it mean when it says ??? this one ??? the Merciful One it ??? Rav Huna Rav ??? Rav Sheishet ??? has a problem ??? a guilt-offering that is not will come after death Let us say, for him ??? a guilt-offering also will come after death He said to them Rav Sheishet a guilt-offering for what was sacrificed ??? A sin-offering also ??? A sin-offering Even atop על גבי ??? the Merciful One he a guilt-offering also it is written of him. he This certain individual after ??? it is written: As it is taught: but: a guilt-offering It is not said in it he except after ??? and should it itself if No. ??? is valid So rather, he why do I have ??? Rav said For Rav Huna said: Rav said a guilt-offering ??? is valid ??? yes. No. ??? No. What is the reason? Scripture states: he ??? Rav ??? and Rav Sheishet ??? Rav ??? son of gifts ??? this one for he says Rabbi Eliezer ??? after death that are are proper And there is no meaning to the word try to calm Let us say, for him ??? also ??? He said to them: Rav ??? son of gifts she will give birth if She she gave birth to ??? who ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? and Who is it who says to us For if it was that it is possible how much One who acts ??? No. ??? And because of the fact and so when that it is possible how much One who acts ??? also ??? This comes to imply ??? them For didn't Rabbi Yochanan say ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) for two his children did he die ??? And there is no meaning to the word in it ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? them (Lev. 2) ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says and not ??? them For didn't R' Yochanan say ??? livestock for two his children did he die ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? of it If you say, This is satisfactory ??? them we were ??? of it ??? them ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.