It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ו,א גמרא

??? No. ??? except If you say, No. ??? them ??? also let them say It is different there in that case For scripture said: (Lev. 27) if ??? ??? one ??? And there is no meaning to the word two ??? He disagreed with this Rav Ya'akov ??? Except I can object with text from here: regarding tithe As it is written (Lev. 27) and if ??? ??? Here, too, one ??? And there is no meaning to the word two ??? that I tithe ??? also ??? He said to him: Rav ??? to Rav Ashi ??? If you say, This is satisfactory ??? them we were ??? from this ??? except If you say, No. ??? them in what way does ??? For didn't Rabbi Abahu say R' Yochanan said: ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? they shall make a substitution. ??? of his. on of his fellow ??? benefit are his ??? No. ??? They posed this difficulty: ??? on Just as ??? or No. ??? Rav Sheshet said the son of of Rav This ??? that is not ??? For if it was You might have thought ??? two For what reason does he came and Rather, what can we conclude? No. ??? For what reason does he was sacrificed Rav Ashi said Rav ??? the son of of Rav This thus ??? has a problem If you say, This is satisfactory No. ??? that did not have ??? and a second person For what reason does he came ??? except If you say, ??? two For what reason does he ??? They posed this difficulty: I shall do." ??? the parasha (scriptural section) ??? or No. ??? who say something ??? Just as A sin-offering from before the parasha (scriptural section) yes. ??? the parasha (scriptural section) No. So, too, here in this case, also, from before the parasha (scriptural section) yes. after the parasha (scriptural section) No. or, perhaps, No. is comparable ??? on all Watch out for leading vav he sinned he sinned he is required ??? one A sin-offering and here in this other case, immediately That there are how much One who acts ??? I shall do." ??? the parasha (scriptural section) also ??? Come and hear: (Lev. 1) ??? And so ??? Is it not the case that yes. atonement except with blood as it is said (Lev. 17) For the blood he ??? except Just as Therefore, scripture states: ??? it was made ??? the remnants i.e., leftovers of a commandment ??? upon it the scripture it is as if No. ??? Is this not ??? One who acts from before the parasha (scriptural section) No. ??? I shall do." ??? that he has i.e., that he is expected One who acts ??? the parasha (scriptural section) Rabba said: One who acts ??? It is different there in that case ??? how much that is not ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning he arises begins ??? ??? you shall One who acts after ??? after ??? No. ??? to us He said to him Rav Huna the son of Yehuda to Raba I would say ??? a person

דף ו,ב גמרא

No. ??? in the presence of heaven? who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: (Lev. 14) ??? with oil who on ??? etc. ??? upon it before Hashem if he gave ??? and if it was not given No. ??? these are the words of Rabbi Akiva R' Yochanan ??? says the remnants i.e., leftovers of a commandment there are. between ??? between that did not have ??? elevate upon it it is as if No. ??? What then does it mean when it says it is as if No. ??? Shall I say ??? sacrifice other than this ??? between ??? between No. ??? except ??? a person No. ??? in the presence of heaven? Here in this case, also, ??? etc. there i.e., in another mishna also ??? the giving of ??? No. ??? presentations ??? Come and hear: R' Shimon says ??? For what reason there are. have come ??? peace-offerings ??? except male goats of ??? For what reason there are. have come on ??? make kiddush. ??? of ??? two For what reason was sacrificed on ??? between this to this say From here, ??? they were Israel ??? in all a time and with all hour except ??? the scripture Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? the parasha (scriptural section) ??? If it was ??? "At the same time," Here, too, Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? "In the case of this one after that one," ??? and let us say, for him ??? and so when ??? "In the case of this one after that one," ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? community ??? that I ??? community ??? a court ??? about them Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav Yehudah Shmuel said for he said: Rav Yehudah Shmuel said ??? community ??? For what reason that are He said to him: Rav Yosef the son of of Rav Shmuel for Rav, ??? and who it has to Rabbi Shimon heart a court gifts about them For didn't Rav Idi bar Avin say Rav said ??? Rabbi Yitzchak said Rabbi Yochanan said: the Tamid-offerings that did not have ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.