It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סה,א משנה

A sin-offering of a bird: ??? that did not have ??? the blood with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time or ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? that did not have ??? or ??? the blood that did not have ??? that did not have was sacrificed the releasing ??? to eat an olive's volume outside an olive's volume tomorrow an olive's volume tomorrow an olive's volume outside ??? olive tree outside ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? olive tree outside is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, R' Yehudah said: This is the general rule: if ??? to the east ??? the place an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. and if ??? the place to the east ??? is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, ??? both this and this is invalid, And there is no meaning to the word in it ??? to eat ??? olive tree and to offer ??? olive tree is valid that do not food ??? combine together

דף סה,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Lev. 1) and bring offerings Just as Scripture states: on account of as it is said (Lev. 1) and he sacrificed from ??? or from My son, ??? It is possible ??? "uf" No. ??? Scripture states: and bring offerings even ??? One ??? to the altar of Just as Scripture states: (Lev. 1) ??? to establish to him a priest that it is possible Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as son of ??? to him north No. fixed to him a priest "uf" that did not have fixed to him north is it not logical that did not have ??? to him a priest Scripture states: to ??? to establish to him a priest It is possible ??? It would be a logical inference for just as if ??? that did not have fixed to it a priest fixed to it implements of ??? to it a priest is it not logical ??? to it implements of Scripture states: (Lev. 1) a priest ??? he said Rabbi Akiva And so ??? on ??? was sacrificed to join with the body of An altar of except Just as Scripture states: a priest that it should be ??? about himself. of a priest It is possible ??? between upwards between downwards Scripture states: ??? Just as ??? on top of lit. on the head of the altar of Even ??? on top of lit. on the head of the altar of ??? You say ??? Or perhaps, except from ??? It would be a logical inference it is said here, ??? and it is said there (Lev. 5) ??? Just as there ??? Even here, ??? If it was Just as there ??? and does not make havdalah Even here, ??? and does not make havdalah Scripture states: ??? Just as ??? for himself ??? for himself Even ??? for himself ??? for himself And from where do we learn ??? about himself. ??? about himself. as it is said (Lev. 1) ??? that specific Behold! ??? So how am I to resolve that (Lev. 1) ??? is what the scripture says. (Lev. 1) ??? all of it to a wall the altar of and not on a wall ??? and not on a wall ??? and whichever this this a wall ??? Or perhaps, except a wall ??? It would be a logical inference Just as livestock ??? is more ??? to the bottom "uf" ??? to the bottom is it not logical ??? to the bottom Scripture states: ??? And so ??? on ??? after ??? he returns ??? except to say to you Just as ??? on top of lit. on the head of the altar of Even The draining of the blood of on top of lit. on the head of the altar of How so? he was an elevation-offering on the ramp ??? to the surrounding ledge??? and he came to the corner south-east he was ??? her head ??? make havdalah ??? on a wall the altar of if it was made to the bottom ??? even cubits ??? Rabbi ??? and Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov say all herself yes. she was made except on top of lit. on the head of the altar of What then does it mean when it says ??? Abaye and Raba who both say makes ??? atop על גבי ??? that it is possible ??? he came ??? The Rabbis taught (Lev. 1) ??? ??? -- this refers to ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: ??? take ??? Abba ??? son of ??? says ??? take ??? of the academy of Rabbi Yishmael a Tanna taught: ??? of it ???

דף סה,ב גמרא

??? and not ??? The Rabbis taught ??? yes. ??? except in the hand of And thus it says (Judges 14) ??? does not turn away ??? that is not like Rabbi ??? as it is taught: R' Elazar said ??? I hear ??? the case is that of a sin-offering, ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Chisdah said The draining of the blood of A sin-offering of a bird: is essential. There is this difference between them: Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned The draining of the blood of A sin-offering of a bird: is essential. And because of the fact ??? blood ??? It once happened an elevation-offering the case is that of a sin-offering, ??? and R' Elazar ??? reasoned The draining of the blood of A sin-offering of a bird: No. is essential. ??? meat in reality he Rava said: ??? two ??? is essential. There is this difference between them: a Tanna taught: that came first reasoned ??? two ??? No. is essential. and even though ??? does he act? It once happened an elevation-offering the case is that of a sin-offering, and Rabbi Eliezer ??? reasoned is essential. And because of the fact ??? meat in reality he Abaye said most of meat is essential. There is this difference between them: ??? For R' Zeira and R' Shmuel son of Rav Isaac One says ??? two ??? is essential. There is this difference between them: and one says most of meat is essential. There is this difference between them: from this general principle it would follow ??? meat ??? yes. For it was taught: How so? ??? A sin-offering of a bird: ??? without most of meat until ??? or ??? they come ??? or ??? a sign of one or the majority of his body and most of meat with it the case is that of an elevation-offering, two or most of two ??? in front of Rabbi ??? he said they hadn't heard it. this one for thus said Rabbi Shimon son of ??? It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer son of ??? It is because of this: ??? son of ??? says he was ??? Shimon I hear the case is that of a sin-offering, ??? And what does it mean when it says No. ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.