It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סז,א משנה

He said to him: R' Eliezer Consider this case: The holiest of holy offerings Those that are slaughtered in the south ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of simple offerings ??? which provides he sleeps their names for a matter of in which is not the laws of misappropriation of sacred things but the laws of misappropriation apply to them, Even you to ??? on The elevation-offering despite the fact ??? her name for a matter of in which is not the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? of it He said to him: R' Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? in the case of the holiest of holy offerings Those that are slaughtered in the south ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of simple offerings which provides he sleeps their names for a matter of in which there is in it prohibits and permission shall you say the case is that of an elevation-offering, ??? her name for a matter of ??? permission

דף סז,א גמרא

It was taught: He said to him: ??? to Rabbi Joshua a guilt-offering ??? in the north for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings He corrects ??? was his name the offering is subject to the laws of misappropriation. And even you to ??? on The elevation-offering ??? her name ??? of it He said to him: Rabbi Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? he sleeps was his name No. he sleeps ??? shall you say the case is that of an elevation-offering, ??? her name he sleeps ??? He said to him: ??? a guilt-offering ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings He corrects ??? was his name he sleeps ??? the offering is subject to the laws of misappropriation. Even you to ??? on The elevation-offering ??? her name he sleeps ??? We do apply the laws of misappropriation to it. He said to him R' Yehoshua No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? was his name he sleeps ??? and not he sleeps ??? shall you say the case is that of an elevation-offering, ??? her name and ??? he sleeps ??? Rabba said: And let him say for him a guilt-offering ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of peace-offerings ??? was his name he sleeps ??? he sleeps ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him thus Learn from this Watch out for leading vav !! and it came down Rabbi Eliezer with his reasoning of Rabbi Joshua for he said: Rav Adda bar Ahavah said that ??? says he was Rabbi Yehoshua An elevation-offering of a bird: that was made to the bottom ??? A sin-offering for the sake of a sin-offering. immediately ??? of it a sign of one ??? and she was made ??? If so, A sin-offering of a bird: also that was made is more ??? The elevation-offering ??? of it a sign of one ??? An elevation-offering of a bird: And if you would say So, here, ??? Yochanan It is because of this: Rabbi ??? thus in the same way She ??? of ??? Is this not thus in the same way She ??? And naught else No. thus in the same way ??? of All of it ??? Rav Ashi said: This is satisfactory An elevation-offering of a bird: that was made to the bottom ??? A sin-offering for the sake of a sin-offering. immediately for it is the case that ??? one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? with two signs and An elevation-offering of a bird: to the bottom ??? immediately ??? of it a sign of one ??? and she was made A sin-offering of a bird: except A sin-offering of a bird: immediately As Mar said: ??? in any place ??? of it a sign of one ??? For he returns ??? a sign of in what way does ??? An elevation-offering of a bird: Back to the main body of the text: Rav Adda bar Ahava said says he was Rabbi Yehoshua An elevation-offering of a bird: that was made to the bottom ??? A sin-offering for the sake of a sin-offering. immediately ??? of it a sign of one ??? and she was made A sin-offering of a bird:

דף סז,ב גמרא

Come and hear: A sin-offering ??? and ascend ??? One who acts ??? is more ??? is valid ??? is invalid, ??? to the bottom ??? is valid ??? is invalid, One is more and one to the bottom ??? for I say A sin-offering ??? is more and ascend ??? to the bottom ??? also ??? to the bottom ??? A sin-offering of a bird: ??? for thus said Rabbi Joshua it is dealing with a case where there is only one. a person it is dealing with a case where there are two men Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Come and hear: A sin-offering and ascend ??? One who acts all of them is more ??? is valid ??? is invalid, all of them to the bottom ??? is valid ??? is invalid, ??? is more ??? to the bottom It is not ??? except ??? And even ??? No. But why? ??? also ??? to the bottom ??? A sin-offering of a bird: And if you say this one that is not ??? Joshua and who seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? thus Come and hear: the his wife ??? Behold! by the ??? if ??? male, she gave birth to male, ??? two ??? One ??? and one ??? It is necessary for him to do them three is more and one to the bottom No. One who acts thus except One who acts two is more and two to the bottom and not double-check it requires that she brings any more ??? One ??? is more ??? sectarians. ??? two parasha (scriptural section) ??? any more three ??? one ??? sectarians. ??? four ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.