It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עד,א גמרא

and we have learnt in a Mishna: Rabbi Eliezer says if was sacrificed ??? of one from them ??? all ??? he for he said: ??? as it is taught: ??? says even blood ??? sends his fellow ??? to him he said ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah Rav said ??? of by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? in a case where there are one hundred finger-rings "She has fallen One from them to the sea an adult male ??? all of them ??? we were ??? Raba for Rav, ??? even One ??? it shall be left to die of natural causes all of them why is it that Let him say ??? He said to him Rav for he said: ??? Eliezer For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Eliezer says: if was sacrificed ??? of one from them ??? all ??? all of them for this statement that ??? said poses a contradiction: No. ??? Rabbi Eliezer except two two but: one one No. He said to him I both ??? Rav said ??? of by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? in a case where there are one hundred finger-rings ??? forty to the place one ??? to the place after parasha (scriptural section) One ??? It is not ??? One ??? what is the difference here, One ??? that is not ??? One ??? also say ??? except if ??? forty all of them to the place one yes. ??? to the place one ??? For ??? in front of Shmuel He said to him ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry ??? doubt whether ??? forbidden until the end of the world. They challenged him from this teaching: doubt whether by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry forbidden doubt whether ??? it is permitted. How so? a cup of by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? fill ??? all of them are forbidden ??? one from them ??? are permitted ??? She as it is taught: R' Yehuda says: ??? forbid in all that he was How so? stillborn lit., fallen one from them ??? are forbidden Rabbi Shimon son of Yehudah says It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon ??? are forbidden ??? that three from three to the place after is permitted. Shmuel for he said: like who If it was like Rabbi Yehudah even in the remainder of ??? is forbidden If it was like Rabbi Shimon even ??? also Sarai And if you say that I for him ??? between by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? Watch out for leading vav So rather, how do you explain that which was taught: doubt whether by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry forbidden doubt whether ??? it is permitted. with whom does it agree? No. Rabbi Yehudah and not R' Shimon In reality lit: In the world Rabbi Shimon And for Shmuel derive it like R' Yehudah ??? upon it ??? Mar said: ??? that three from three to the place after is permitted.

דף עד,ב גמרא

What is the difference three That there are ??? two also that it is possible ??? What then does it mean when it says three where he teaches both This is only in the case And if you wish, I would say derive it ??? Eliezer he said Reish Lakish: ??? of terumah ??? in a case where there are one hundred ??? "She has fallen One from them to the Sea of Salt ??? all of them ??? stillborn lit., fallen and It is necessary to teach this ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? For if it was ??? then I might incorrectly say: that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? to it permit but: terumah ??? to it permit No. and if ??? but: ??? that is not ??? No. It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. Rabbah said No. ??? Reish Lakish: except ??? but: ??? No. and Rav Yosef said: even ??? thus in the same way ??? R' Elazar said ??? of terumah ??? "He opens one from them take ??? so that ??? and drink ??? Rav Dimi and he said to it about this teaching ??? He said to him ??? and two ??? I saw Here in this case, except I would say ??? One from them take ??? so that ??? and drink R' Osha'ya said ??? of terumah ??? in a case where there are one hundred ??? hundred from them take ??? so that ??? and drink but the remainder of are forbidden until ??? we do not say ??? This is satisfactory all of them No. ??? except This ??? How so? If it was ??? for him he shall take ??? If it was No. know for him ??? know ??? They said: of the academy of Rabbi ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? he said ??? also ??? his reasoning is ??? it requires ??? in the time of The halacha is it requires examination Rabbi ??? he said For example, ??? and R' Eliezer She for he said: ??? No. ??? to join with the body of An altar of all of them like Rabbi ??? they do not say between ??? This ??? and that one ??? they do not say They reason ??? It is not it requires ??? in the time of The halacha is It is not it requires examination ??? they do not say like Rabbi Eliezer No. ??? holy offerings ??? Hey, isn't it the case that he is required ??? Rav Yosef said ??? women but: ??? men No.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.