It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פה,א גמרא

she will not be ??? outside ??? outside He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Chiyya son of Avin: ??? "uf" inside ??? outside is exempt ??? outside ??? outside he is liable Let him say she will not be ??? outside ??? If you wish, I would say ??? inside ??? killed him Ulla said The offal of simple offerings that were raised onto the altar before ??? their blood May not descend, ??? of An altar of R' Zayra said: Even We also ??? of its blood that went out of its blood except ??? for just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? came to throw he (to throw) does not have is what you say? Do you really mean that? If they ascended, they did not descend Here in this case, ??? came to throw ??? is it not all the more so? ??? holy offerings Behold! Passover ??? he ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: and all of them ??? depend to join with the body of An altar of They descended this one ??? May not descend, Is this not They did not teach this לא שנו The holiest of holy offerings there is no difference simple offerings No. this one ??? from them They descended from them May not descend, Hey, isn't it the case that all of them The tanna teaches: all of them ??? This is obvious! In reality lit: In the world ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? ??? for he said: If they ascended, they did not descend in what way have you established that it is ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, and thus an elevation-offering ??? raw lit., living to the beginning lit., to the head the altar of ??? it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it on top of lit. on the head of the altar of ??? in its place and if is invalid the daughter of flaying ??? She (Lev. 1) ??? it the Merciful One in the Torah says it is valid and not is invalid at the end of the teaching, ??? And what does it mean when it says Come and hear from this. ??? flaying ??? on top of lit. on the head of the altar of and for one for he said: yes. flaying ??? on top of lit. on the head of the altar of What is there to say? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? to him ??? and Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon She for he said: immediately ??? the blood ??? meat one hour ??? and Awake, to the priests and Rather, that which was taught How so? makes ??? ??? to the bottom ??? why do I have in what way does ??? (Mal. 1) ??? please, ??? or ??? Your face We thus we say it. ??? why do I have For if it was ??? a priest other than this and not know ???

דף פה,ב גמרא

and We ??? them to the priests the validity ??? of it to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? Watch out for leading vav But nevertheless, is preferable, that it shall not be my sanctity heaven ??? he said Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba he is required Rabbi Yochanan The offal of simple offerings that were raised onto the altar before ??? their blood They descended or May not descend, He said to him Rabbi Ami ??? to you the laws of misappropriation of sacred things He said to him the laws of misappropriation of sacred things No. ??? for me ??? he ??? them ??? For ??? for him ??? May not descend, and They do not have the laws of misappropriation of sacred things Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he would say over thus Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said he is required Rabbi Yochanan The offal of simple offerings that were raised onto the altar before ??? their blood there are of them the laws of misappropriation of sacred things or No. He said to him Rabbi Ami ??? to you ??? He said to him ??? No. ??? for me ??? of An altar of For ??? for me the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? thus May not descend, and They do not have ??? and these No. he was ??? that R' Yochanan said No. ??? Rabbi Akiva except ??? Because and are proper ??? This is only in the case ??? ??? give thanks Rabbi Akiva ??? female ??? is comparable he is required Rabbi ??? there are ??? or yes. ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? from ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? all in a case ??? all in a case ??? or, perhaps, Behold! ??? in it transgression Rabbah said Come and hear: Rabbi Akiva considers it proper ??? and if ??? also ??? Because and is valid ??? Learn from this Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said Even We also ??? ??? all of them impart tumah garments when worn by one who swallows the meat of such an invalid sacrifice ??? Rabbi ??? viceroy the priests. ??? And what can we come and learn from this? If you wish, I would say It once happened Come and learn from this. And if you wish, I would say What then does it mean when it says ??? in the same way ??? He ascended ??? Ulla said They did not teach such a ruling except that did not have ??? of them the fire lit., the light but: ??? of them the fire lit., the light they went up to Rav ??? he would say over He interprets it as referring to the earlier text Rav ??? he would say over ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? they went up to ??? No. they went up to Ulla said They did not teach such a ruling except that did not have ??? of them the fire lit., the light but: ??? of them the fire lit., the light they went up to one ??? how much more so He interprets it as referring to the earlier text and one ??? He interprets it as referring to the earlier text but: ??? Is this not My son, ???

דף פה,ב משנה

and these If they ascended, they were permitted to descend meat The holiest of holy offerings meat simple offerings and it is permitted ??? and two ??? and bread ??? and the remnants i.e., leftovers of menuchot offerings: the incense the wool ??? and the gate ??? at a time in a case when they ??? they went up to as it is said (Lev. 1) ??? The entirety ??? No. they went up to as it is said (Deut. 12) and You did ??? and the blood

דף פה,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Lev. 1) ??? The entirety ??? It is possible even ??? Therefore, scripture states: and You did ??? and the blood If it was flesh and blood

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.