It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פז,א גמרא

??? two ??? Rav Chisda he said the rising of the dawn ??? They said: among Rav What is the reason of Rav? ??? for just as ??? that does not do anything ??? makes ??? the rising of the dawn which does ??? is it not logical which does ??? before ??? after the rising of the dawn Rava said: ??? two ??? Rav Chisda he said They do not have ??? In reality lit: In the world Rav Yosef disagreed and Who is it who says to us ??? on top of lit. on the head of the altar of ??? them ??? perhaps, all in a case ??? them ??? them ??? Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? Joseph it was said: also Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said ??? before ??? after ??? benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. and thus was taught bar-Kappara ??? before ??? after ??? something the laws of misappropriation of sacred things He said to him Rav ??? And so based on this lit: from after, ??? Joseph and Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said and thus It was taught by bar-Kappara Rabbah and Rav Chisda in what way ??? He said to him: ??? Raba brought this very question ??? on its head of An altar of or It is not ??? on its head of An altar of How so? Shall I say that is not They descended now to us in the courtyard is what you say? Do you really mean that? that is not They descended on its head of An altar of ??? So rather, ??? to it For it was taught in a baraita even there are. on the table days many Watch out for leading vav And there is no objection at all. or perhaps, to the earth ??? He said to him yes. ??? on its head of An altar of he accepted it from him. or No. Come and hear: ??? in the courtyard ??? and brought all the night. to us on its head of An altar of ??? and brought In reality lit: In the world They descended Rava said: they went up to Rava said: No. they went up to Learn from this No. he accepted it from him. ??? in the same way ??? make kiddush. ??? The rabbis taught: (Ex. 29) ??? with the altar yes. for me except An altar of ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: the altar of implements of ??? Scripture states: (Ex. 30) all ??? at them." ??? Reish Lakish: brought this very question ??? implements of ??? What then? ??? ??? He said to him ??? in the same way ??? ??? to them thus in the same way vessels ??? He said to him ??? for me Here, too, ???

דף פז,ב גמרא

??? ??? Is this not ??? and its sprinkling of the blood was performed by invalid priests No. ??? An altar of ??? he is equivalent. or No. Come and hear: in the same way ??? make kiddush. thus in the same way ??? make kiddush. And if you say ??? An altar of Is this not ??? he is equivalent. ??? also Is this not ??? he is equivalent. in what way does ??? for him ??? it was. for him ??? for him Hey, isn't it the case that ??? there are between ??? the majority of his body ??? the majority of his body ??? this one who seeks pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama there are ??? or No. ??? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction ??? He disagreed with this Raba son of Rav ??? And if you say ??? An altar of ??? he is equivalent. An elevation-offering of a bird: ??? in what way does It concerns itself this one ??? An altar of He disagreed with this Rav ??? son of ??? Why is it that No. It concerns itself For example, he said: ??? in order ??? tomorrow ??? This is satistfactory to Raba for he said: ??? on top of lit. on the head of the altar of except ??? for he said: yes. ??? on top of lit. on the head of the altar of ??? also It concerns itself For example, he said: ??? in order ??? before the rising of the dawn ??? after the rising of the dawn ??? side from this ??? An altar of ??? he is equivalent. For if it was ??? An altar of Is this not ??? he is equivalent.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.