It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ט,א גמרא

??? holy offerings ??? next to holy offerings ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? holy offerings ??? next to holy offerings those that are not they are eaten because A sin-offering and a guilt-offering who No. ??? except ??? holy offerings ??? by any person. next to holy offerings ??? by any person. And there is no meaning to the word ??? holy offerings ??? by any person. next to holy offerings that do not they are eaten by any person. Rabbi Yosei ??? Avin: he said ??? simple offerings next to simple offerings And there is no meaning to the word ??? simple offerings next to The holiest of holy offerings He disagreed with this Rav Isaac ??? I would say ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of tithe ??? tithe for what ??? that is not that ??? should request upon it ??? (Lev. 27) without ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 27) ??? it shall be ??? this tithe And there is no meaning to the word after tithe I would say ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of first-born ??? for what ??? that is not that ??? should request So, too, ??? to the priests first-born also ??? and so go ahead and say ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of substitute offerings? ??? substitute offerings? for what ??? upon it So, too, ??? upon it (Lev. 27) without he shall sell and not ??? Mar Zutra said: the son of of Rav ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 27) and it was the case that he ??? -- this refers to substitute offerings? And there is no meaning to the word after substitute offerings? and so go ahead and say ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of a thangkgiving-offering ??? For a thangkgiving-offering for what ??? bread who that it is possible something ??? it does not require bread ??? he is required bread If so, now also who that it is possible something ??? it does not require ??? he is required ??? We thus we say it. who that it is possible something ??? a thangkgiving-offering herself it does not require bread And even is permitted. That it comes them ??? bread He disagreed with this Rav ??? the son of of Rav ??? And from where do you derive ??? Passover it is written perhaps, ??? a guilt-offering it is written Rabba said: Scripture states: (Lev. 3) and if from ??? its sacrifice ??? peace-offerings a thing ??? in all ??? He disagreed with this R' Avin: son of Chiyya (and there are those who say R' Avin: son of ??? in all ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? from to discharge the mitzvah here, from ??? he said R' with whom does it agree? Here in this case, also, from to discharge the mitzvah that is not will come son of two two and not will come ??? He disagreed with this Rav Channah of Baghdad and who seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? and so when it is written This ??? Passover it is written Hey, isn't it the case that From the fact that it is written (Lev. 3) if ??? (Lev. 3) if ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? Passover it is written This certain individual should bring himself to account for that which was taught ??? the Paschal offering ??? For as it says: if ??? Passover Watch out for leading vav A sin-offering which has passed its year and is too old to offer and peace-offerings that come ??? Passover for all the commandments peace-offerings ??? For as it says: if ??? on ??? that is not require ??? Hey, isn't it the case that from here ??? of Shmuel ??? for he said: The father of Shmuel and if from ??? its sacrifice ??? peace-offerings a thing that comes from ??? peace-offerings ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah ??? for he said: Rav ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah from where do we learn ??? Passover ??? peace-offerings as it is said (in Deut. 16) ??? Passover to Hashem ??? and mornings Is it not the case that yes. Passover came except from ??? and from ??? except from here ??? the Paschal offering that it should be for a matter of that comes from ??? and from the morning And what does it mean when it says ??? peace-offerings except three ??? are written

דף ט,ב גמרא

one ??? its time ??? and one ??? its time and not ??? and one ??? No. its time and not ??? and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: one then I might incorrectly say: in a case ??? and its time ??? but: ??? its time and not ??? two I would say No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: Behold! both It is because of this: ??? them ??? but: in a case that is not he crossed No. its time and not ??? I would say No. ??? Rav said in the name ??? A sin-offering ??? A sin-offering ??? For scripture said: (Lev. 6) this ??? Torah One for all ??? Raba and he said to it about this teaching ??? Rav ??? to Raba Rabbi Shimon says: all The menuchot offerings: ??? that did not have ??? and if they put it up on the altar ??? guilt-obligation on account of that do not The menuchot offerings: ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? upon it that it ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? that it ??? but: ??? is not thus ??? One for all of them ??? One for all of them ??? One for all of them The reason is ??? this one yes. ??? No. why is it that Let us say, (Lev. 6) this ??? the Minchah Torah One for all The menuchot offerings: except If it was said thus it was said: Rav said in the name ??? A sin-offering ??? in order ??? of it ??? yes. atonement ??? and let us say, did he die in reality Thus can we come and learn from this. The reason is ??? this one ??? is equivalent ??? is invalid And what does it mean when it says ??? A sin-offering a Nazir and A sin-offering one suffering from tzara'at Behold! ??? except If it was said thus it was said: Rav said in the name ??? A sin-offering ??? on ??? A sin-offering ??? A sin-offering ??? an elevation-offering She that it is possible for he said: Rav said in the name ??? A sin-offering ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. ??? is invalid A sin-offering ??? an elevation-offering She and let us say, A sin-offering a Nazir and A sin-offering one suffering from tzara'at the essence A sin-offering ??? Rav said A sin-offering milk ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. blood for the sake of a sin-offering. by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. a Nazir for the sake of a sin-offering. one suffering from tzara'at is invalid Behold! ??? he is required Raba A sin-offering milk ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. ??? make kiddush. ??? What then? who say he is spiritually cut off ??? or perhaps, yes. ??? Rav Acha the son of of Raba he would say over all of them ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא (Lev. 4) ??? it ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of it A sin-offering Rav Ashi said to him for Rav, ??? the son of of Raba ??? in what way does you learn to it He said to him: We ??? we learn to it ??? we learn ??? Rabba said: A sin-offering milk ??? on who ??? A sin-offering blood and A sin-offering by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry is invalid on who ??? A sin-offering a Nazir and A sin-offering one suffering from tzara'at ??? and in that case to it thus he is required Raba A sin-offering milk ??? on who ??? A sin-offering ??? make kiddush. ??? What then? who ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? or perhaps, yes. ??? it was said: it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? to throw of its blood that did not have ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: is invalid ??? he said ??? R' Yochanan said: is invalid "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? an invalidating act nevertheless and Reish Lakish: he said ??? yes. "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? and not ??? an invalidating act nevertheless ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.