It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צא,א גמרא

And even atop על גבי of Musaf ??? because Sabbath ??? No. ??? Come and hear: ??? Sabbath ??? the tip of ??? because the tip of ??? that are his ??? Sabbath No. ??? Come and hear: ??? the tip of ??? the New Year even though ??? the year ??? because the New Year ??? that are his ??? the tip of ??? No. ??? Come and hear: Another explanation: the blessing on the wine ??? and you shall bless..." the day It is not ??? but when it is not ??? before even though ??? the day ??? because Sabbath that the blessing of the day ??? that the blessing of the wine No. ??? Come and hear: for he said: Rabbi Yochanan The halacha is a person prays of the afternoon service (Minchah) and after this of the additional offerings because Sabbath to the prayer of the additional offerings ??? to the prayer of the afternoon service (Minchah) No. ??? Come and hear: peace-offerings of ??? A sin-offering and a guilt-offering of day peace-offerings of ??? this one This and this ??? A sin-offering and a guilt-offering ??? and even though ??? Rabba said: is found ??? to us is found No. ??? to us He said to him: Rav Huna the son of Yehuda to Raba because is found Is this not ??? For it was taught: ??? the Paschal offering that is not ??? and not ??? ??? that it ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? And if you wish, I would say ??? to join with the body of Passover For ??? is comparable They posed this difficulty: ??? but when it is not ??? What then does it mean when it says who say immediately ??? for him or, perhaps, he will give after ??? until ??? for him ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? Rav Huna said ??? Come and hear: peace-offerings of ??? A sin-offering and a guilt-offering of day of ??? before ??? day this one ??? is equivalent ??? and How so? How should we understand this? ??? A sin-offering and a guilt-offering ??? Perhaps peace-offerings ??? and A sin-offering and a guilt-offering ??? in what way does It concerns itself ??? but not ??? to you Come and hear: Another explanation: the blessing on the wine ??? and you shall bless..." the day It is not ??? but when it is not ??? before So, here, ??? like who ??? both of them. he is equivalent. Come and hear: for thus said Rabbi Yochanan The halacha is a person prays of the afternoon service (Minchah) and after this of the additional offerings So, here, immediately ??? time the prayer of the afternoon service (Minchah) like who ??? both of them. he is equivalent. He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? before ??? is invalid, because of as it is said in it (Ex. 12) twilight before ??? is valid ??? until ??? the blood Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? He said to him: Rav Acha elder to Rav Ashi Our mishna also ??? where he teaches until ??? the blood ??? and not The tanna teaches: until ??? blood ??? and in all of them priests ??? What is the reason? Scripture states: (in Numbers 18) ??? like the way when the kings they eat

דף צא,א משנה

Rabbi Shimon said: if you see oil that he was ??? in the courtyard it is not necessary to ask What then? except is permitted. ??? menuchot offerings: Israel ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at if you see oil that he was ??? atop ??? it is not necessary to ask What then? except is permitted. ??? Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the priests the meal-offering of the anointed priest that do not ??? oil Rabbi ??? says ??? oil

דף צא,ב גמרא

Shmuel said according to the words of Rabbi Tarfon ??? oil ??? they are eaten What is the reason? Scripture states: sacrifice the afternoon service (Minchah) This teaches ??? oil And so the afternoon service (Minchah) Just as the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? they are eaten Even oil ??? they are eaten R' Zayra said: Even We also ??? Thus said Rabbi Shimon if you see oil ??? in the courtyard If it was you It is necessary for him to ask What then? except is permitted. ??? menuchot offerings: Israel ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at that do not ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? Abaye said to him: I would say at the end of the teaching, if you see oil ??? atop ??? If it was you It is necessary for him to ask What then? except is permitted. ??? Watch out for leading vav the meal-offering of the priests the meal-offering of the anointed priest that do not ??? oil from this general principle it would follow ??? all of them ??? it is a problem But the beginning of the teaching, to Rabbi Zeira it is a problem at the end of the teaching, This is satisfactory to Rabbi Zeira But the beginning of the teaching, ??? at the end of the teaching, regarding the handful of meal-offering except ??? it is a problem a Tanna taught: But the beginning of the teaching, because at the end of the teaching, This is satisfactory at the end of the teaching, It was taught by It is because of this: But the beginning of the teaching, except But the beginning of the teaching, It is because of this: at the end of the teaching, who It was taught by yes. In the west, they said a Tanna taught: But the beginning of the teaching, It is because of this: ??? Come and hear: wine in accordance with the words of Rabbi Akiva ??? oil in accordance with the words of Rabbi ??? Is this not ??? all of it ??? oil all of it ??? something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has Rav Pappa said: ??? oil No. ??? Rabbi says ??? about what do they disagree? ??? rabbis in front of Rav ??? There is this difference between them: is a law established by the Rabbis reason that Just as the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? Even oil ??? Just as the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? oil Even here, ??? oil for just as the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? they are eaten Even oil ??? they are eaten And the other one ??? Just as the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? Even oil ??? Just as ??? oil three ??? for just as ??? all of them ??? Even oil all of them ??? He said to him: Rav ??? If it was ??? to it ??? except Rabbi ??? to it He said to him Rav Huna the son of of Rav he gave for Rav, ??? who seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? thus For it was taught: sacrifice the afternoon service (Minchah) This teaches ??? oil and how much time is the duration of three ??? and one ??? for him for he said: three ??? Rabbi She ??? to it ??? He said to him If it was It was taught: It was taught: Shmuel said ??? wine sends ??? atop ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא Scripture states: (Num. 15) and wine ??? a woman ??? to Hashem And then it happened that ??? in part No. ??? Really? For didn't Rav say ??? Rabbah said son of Avuah ??? from by regarding the altar of ??? he is liable ??? except This If you wish, I would say ??? of a commandment that I Come and hear: ??? son of Ya'akov ??? that was given Torah ??? It is possible ??? and separate terumah is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. ??? It is different there in that case ??? Come and hear: wine in accordance with the words of Rabbi Akiva ??? oil in accordance with the words of Rabbi ??? And furthermore, It was taught: wine ??? Or perhaps, except ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. ??? There is no difficulty. this one is Rabbi Yehudah this one Rabbi Shimon This comes to imply of Shmuel like Rabbi Shimon he reasons for himself. For didn't Shmuel say ??? of ??? in the public domain on account of that did not have ??? of it many

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.