It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צח,א גמרא

that it is possible ??? for him from here and there are ??? for him from here A sin-offering Just as A sin-offering ??? Even all ??? a guilt-offering Just as a guilt-offering yes. then the ruling is acceptable. ??? in it Even all yes. then the ruling is acceptable. ??? in it his reasoning is ??? holy offerings ??? there are. ??? Just as ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? life, ??? Even all ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? life, ??? peace-offerings Just as peace-offerings ??? Even all ??? in a baraita it was taught in the name ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) Just as the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? Even all ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) and It is necessary to teach this ??? A sin-offering For if it was we had heard the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? but: A sin-offering I would say No. and if we had heard A sin-offering It is because of this: ??? but: the afternoon service (Minchah) I would say it is not necessary to teach this A sin-offering Just as A sin-offering It is not she entered except from ??? by day in his hand ??? Even all It is not she entered except from ??? by day in his hand ??? and A sin-offering From where do we derive this? Rav Chisdah said Scripture states: (Lev. 16) and he sacrificed ??? A bull ??? who to him of his. and not is from that which is belonging to ??? and not is from that which is belonging to tithe by day (Lev. 7) ??? so that ??? in his hand ??? son of son of ??? for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? he said Reish Lakish: in all places as it is said ??? and the priesthood he does not except ??? so that ??? And if you wish, I would say derive it like Rabbi Shimon for he said: ??? No. ??? the priesthood the priesthood ??? a guilt-offering Just as a guilt-offering ??? are permitted Even all ??? are permitted Rabba said: This is obvious! for me

דף צח,ב גמרא

blood A sin-offering to the bottom ??? an elevation-offering is more required ??? he is required Raba blood an elevation-offering to the bottom ??? A sin-offering is more What then? It is because of this: ??? he Hey, isn't it the case that ??? or, perhaps, It is because of this: ??? he Hey, isn't it the case that No. ??? he returns ??? Rabba said: This is obvious! for me blood on ??? separating and if ??? he he does not separating ??? on ??? separating and if sell ??? he he does not separating he is required Raba blood ??? on ??? What then? if ??? he Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for me It is because of this: ??? and if sell ??? he Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for me It is because of this: blood it is not necessary to teach this that He performs this one Hey, isn't it the case that ??? No. ??? or, perhaps, ??? also No. ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered.

דף צח,ב משנה

A tevul yom ??? are not they divide ??? to eat ??? and does not ??? and does not ??? to eat ??? between ??? between ??? they divide and they eat but not ??? all that is not ??? he does not ??? in the case of the flesh. and all that do not to him in the case of the flesh. he (??? ) does not have even tamei in the hour of ??? and tahor in the hour of ??? he does not ??? in the case of the flesh. as it is said (Lev. 7) ??? blood ??? to him ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.