It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קא,א גמרא

??? No. ??? and the master of ??? in a case ??? tamei as it is taught: (Lev. 27) and if all livestock that is tamei who No. ??? from it sacrifice to Hashem ??? is what the scripture says. You say ??? who have been redeemed Or perhaps, except ??? that is tamei actually and really For as it says: (Lev. 27) and if ??? and "He redeemed ??? Behold! livestock that is tamei ??? So how am I to resolve that and if all livestock that is tamei ??? who have been redeemed is what the scripture says. It is possible ??? on ??? transgresses Scripture states: who No. ??? from it sacrifice to Hashem who that is not ??? to Hashem all the essence Came forth -- this refers to that is not ??? the day ??? tomorrow ??? Rav Huna son of ??? the frankincense and implements of ??? Watch out for leading vav And they do not have redemption that did not have it is said redemption except ??? This is satisfactory ??? the sanctity of ??? It is not said except ??? except pieces of wood frankincense and implements of ??? except Is this not It is because of this: ??? in reality yes. ??? and Behold! also even though ??? frankincense Is this not My son, ??? eating ??? except ??? them eating ??? how much that is not ??? them ??? No. ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense also how much that is not ??? in a vessel of service No. ??? implements of ??? also Because and there is for them ??? No. In reality lit: In the world I would say to you ??? in reality ??? and Behold! It is because of this: that is not ??? he This is satisfactory Watch out for leading vav frankincense and implements of ??? No. ??? except pieces of wood ??? pieces of wood also immediately As Mar said: all wood ??? in it ??? is invalid, to join with the body of An altar of ??? No. ??? Rav Pappa said: If it was ??? for him ??? this one that teaches ??? the house yes. ??? those particular except ??? for all of ??? he does not he would exit something An altar of In reality lit: In the world and even though ??? yes. ??? Because ??? are these it was. he returns of him. and not She ??? for him and not he returns of him. Is this not is what you say? Do you really mean that? there i.e., in another mishna immediately that is not ??? No. ??? Here in this case, also, immediately ??? for even in the case where ??? also ??? No. ??? Rav Kahana he said ??? yes. ??? and thus R' Osha'ya said ??? yes. ??? that it is possible that they said R' Osha'ya said Even if ??? Rabbi Eliezer says all of them ??? yes. ??? except ??? of Minchah-offering of a sinner for behold! he said Torah ??? on ??? said Rabbi Osha'ya I hear ??? at Minchah to Rabbi Shimon he does not become tamei ??? they eat For it was taught in a baraita ??? the vineyard

דף קא,ב גמרא

??? one suffering from tzara'at and he exempted a donkey meat ??? all of them impart tumah ??? they eat Rabbi Shimon says: all of them yes. impart tumah ??? they eat give thanks R' Shimon in the case of the flesh. ??? they eat Because it was to him ??? and Rav Assi said: R' Yochanan said: What is the reason? ??? (Lev. 11) from all One who eats who shall eat he eats that you It is possible ??? to others ??? he eats he eats ??? you It is possible ??? to others he does not ??? he eats Hey, isn't it the case that ??? at Minchah also he eats ??? you It is possible ??? to others he If so, meat ??? also Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? that you It is possible ??? to others he as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon son of Yehudah says It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon meat ??? is forbidden in cases regarding eating and it is permitted to benefit from it as it is said (Deut. 14) For with ??? you to Hashem ??? No. ??? of its mother and elsewhere in the scripture he says (Ex. 22) and the men of ??? for me meat in the field ??? No. ??? Just as there is forbidden in cases regarding eating and it is permitted to benefit from it Even here, is forbidden in cases regarding eating and it is permitted to benefit from it one And furthermore, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: one ??? that you It is possible ??? to others he And furthermore, for him also it was to him ??? They challenged him from this teaching: Rabbi Shimon says: there are notar that he was become tamei ??? they eat and there are notar that is not become tamei ??? they eat How so? Before the act of sprinkling, he does not become tamei ??? they eat After the act of sprinkling, become tamei ??? they eat ??? an invalidating act nevertheless between in the case of the holiest of holy offerings between in the case of simple-holiness offerings. he does not become tamei ??? they eat ??? at Minchah become tamei ??? they eat There is no difficulty. here, that have ??? here, that did not have an hour when it was legal for the priests? How so? that is not it was to it ??? that is connected ??? This is satistfactory ??? for he said: Rabbi ??? yes. ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except ??? for he said: even ??? now from this No. ??? And because of the fact So if he wished, ??? for him ??? for him to Rabbi Shimon for he said: all ??? he is equivalent. as it is taught: Rabbi Shimon says: a cow imparts tumah ??? they eat Because it was to it ??? and Raysh Lakish said says he was R' Shimon a cow ??? for the sake of ??? thus now This is satisfactory a cow is standing ??? She ??? he found ??? a commandment ??? except Behold! menuchot offerings: a commandment ??? Hey, isn't it the case that to us Before the act of sprinkling, of a commandment ??? and if he is required In a case where he sprinkled the blood --- And we have learned ??? become tamei ??? they eat Here in this case, with what are we dealing? that did not have it was ??? by day ??? but: it was to him ??? by day What then does it mean when it says become tamei ??? they eat ??? to us After the act of sprinkling, become tamei ??? they eat ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? that did not have it was to him ??? by day but: it was to him ??? by day become tamei ??? they eat Here, too, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: to us before the time when it is appropriate to sprinkle the blood i.e., before sunset he does not become tamei ??? they eat until after the time when it is appropriate to sprinkle the blood i.e., after sunset become tamei ??? they eat Hey, isn't it the case that ??? between in the case of the holiest of holy offerings between in the case of simple-holiness offerings. a commandment ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.