It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קט,א גמרא

But why? ??? stillborn lit., fallen ??? did he die the purchaser ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? that I the purchaser ??? the master of ??? on the lower one Now that you have come to this understanding, you can apply the same understanding to this other problem: Even if you say ??? a hand the master of ??? on the lower one

דף קט,א משנה

Behold! by the an elevation-offering ??? in the Holy Temple and if ??? in the house of ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. Behold! by the an elevation-offering ??? in the house of ??? in the Holy Temple and if ??? in the house of ??? he has fulfilled his obligation Rabbi Shimon says: This is not an elevation-offering ??? a Nazir ??? in the Holy Temple and if ??? in the house of ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? a Nazir ??? in the house of ??? in the Holy Temple and if ??? in the house of ??? he has fulfilled his obligation R' Shimon says yes. this a Nazir

דף קט,א גמרא

he has fulfilled his obligation this one ??? Rav Hamnunah said was it made? ??? Behold! by the an elevation-offering ??? that did not have ??? He said to him: Raba Except I can object with text from here: at the end of the teaching, where he teaches ??? a Nazir ??? in the house of ??? in the Holy Temple and if ??? in the house of ??? he has fulfilled his obligation Here, too, ??? a Nazir in order that did not have ??? a Nazir how much that is not ??? No. ??? except Rabba said: a person this ??? he said If it was ??? in the house of ??? could not do it. ??? a Nazir also This a person ??? he said If it was ??? in the house of ??? could not do it. ??? and Rav Hamnunah He could say to you a Nazir ??? an elevation-offering in order that did not have ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: And even Rabbi Yochanan derive it about this teaching of Rav Hamnunah. for he said: Rabbah son of son of ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: Behold! by the an elevation-offering ??? in the house of ??? in the land of Israel he has fulfilled his obligation ??? he is spiritually cut off Another teaching is like this: Behold! by the an elevation-offering ??? in the wilderness ??? the Jordan he has fulfilled his obligation ??? he is spiritually cut off

דף קט,א משנה

the priests. ??? in the house of ??? No. ??? in the Holy Temple ??? and it is not necessary to say to a different matter as it is said (II Kings 23) ??? No. they went up to ??? to An altar of Hashem in Jerusalem but instead he ate the commandments ??? Behold! these ??? they divide and they eat and not ???

דף קט,א גמרא

Rav Yehudah said a priest ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars ??? its sacrifice ??? Rav said Isaac son of ??? What scripture supports this position? (Ezek. 44) ??? who ??? before ??? they were ??? Israel ??? iniquity because of this ??? the hands of upon them ??? Hashem God ??? and it is written secondly: and not ??? to me ??? for me If it was a slave ??? yes. ??? Is this not ??? it was said: ??? Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified Rav ??? he said its sacrifice ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said yes. its sacrifice ??? Rav Sheshet said ??? I thought to say to it As it is written they were ??? Israel ??? iniquity What is the ruling? Is this not or ??? or iniquity ??? and iniquity ??? Rav ??? Rav Nachman said ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: (Num. 15) ??? on ??? This teaches ??? by way of lit., through the hands of himself in what way Shall I say ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? even ??? also except Is this not Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified And Rav Sheishet said to you In reality lit: In the world ??? and with intent No. was it made? ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry ??? Rav ??? he said its sacrifice ??? And Rav Sheishet said yes. its sacrifice ??? Rav ??? he said its sacrifice ??? that is not a slave ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said yes. its sacrifice ???

דף קט,ב גמרא

was it made? ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry Rav Nachman said ??? I thought to say to it as it is taught: a priest ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? its sacrifice ??? in what way Shall I say in error What then does it mean when it says ??? he except This is obvious! with intent and if Through the sprinkling of blood did the bread become sanctified For ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall this one a slave to it ??? except Is this not ??? And Rav Sheishet said to you In reality lit: In the world in error and thus he comes to say if ??? and so when a slave in error a slave its sacrifice ??? And if not, yes. its sacrifice ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry Rav ??? he said its sacrifice ??? And Rav Sheishet said yes. its sacrifice ??? some texts read: for the worship of stars some texts read: for idolatry Rav ??? he said its sacrifice ??? And Rav Sheishet said yes. its sacrifice ??? And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard ??? the first ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav Sheishet It is because of this: ??? for him ??? but: ??? that is not a slave for him ??? I would say give thanks for him for Rav, ??? and if we had heard ??? It is because of this: ??? for him the blessing of the Service but: ??? that is not a slave for him the blessing of the Service I would say it is not necessary to teach this and if we had heard ??? It is because of this: that He performs for him It once happened but: ??? in reality I would say No. ??? and it is not necessary to say Another thing: ??? it is not necessary to say Another thing: from this general principle it would follow ??? Is this not by some texts star-worship ??? the blessing of the Service ??? he It was taught: like who for he said: the house of ??? Is this not by some texts star-worship ??? the blessing of the Service ??? he as it is taught: it year" ??? Shimon ??? He said to them: year" -- this refers to he did he die They said to him: from where do we learn do you know He said to them: all Yom Kippur ??? for me an elderly person one ??? to the children ??? to the children and he has entered with me" and went out with me" year" -- this refers to ??? for me an elderly person one ??? and he has entered with me" He has not fulfilled his obligation. with me" after ??? seven days did he die ??? the priests. ??? at the Name in the hour of ??? He said to them: ??? My son, ??? in it ??? that he was greater than it two two ??? He said to him: came ??? order of the blessing of the Service ??? next to the altar of He said to them: his brothers? the priests. saw Just as ??? this stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? that specific day ??? that is large ??? they sought ??? the priests. ??? ran ??? after him: he has walked ??? of Egypt" he built in that place An altar of and raised up upon it ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? the sages In the matter And they said Just as this that did not have He descended to it thus in the same way ??? to it compared to the one case, how much more so the other! these are the words of Rabbi Meir He said to him: Rabbi Yehudah It is not thus It once happened except No. ??? upon it ??? that he was ??? greater than it two two ??? and "Even though it is thus, ??? in it ??? He said to him: came ??? order of the blessing of the Service ??? next to the altar of He said to them: his brothers? the priests. saw Just as ??? this stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? that specific day ??? that is large ??? they sought ??? the priests. ??? to them all ??? they sought ??? ??? ran ??? after him: ran ??? the king ??? after him: all the one who sees that specific says this is this he he has walked ??? of Egypt" he built in that place An altar of and raised up upon it for the sake of lit. in the name of heaven as it is said (Is. 19) ??? by day This certain individual it shall be An altar of to Hashem in the midst of earth Egypt" ??? next to ??? to Hashem ??? the sages In the matter And they said for just as this ??? from it thus in the same way ??? to descend to it on One how much ??? It was taught: he said R' Yehoshua son of ??? at the beginning all One who says He ascended to it I ??? before the lion, Watch out for leading vav "And now, all One who says for me to descend from it I casts upon it ??? of ??? for behold! the grave ??? from it ??? seek ??? David He said to him: Master, ??? the son of of Rav Chisda ??? R' Meir This he read of Rabbi Yehudah What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him to account for that which was taught after ??? of ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? and found My son, kings that were they sit ??? of gold ??? that did not have ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry as it is said (Is. 19) by day This certain individual ??? in the land." Egypt" from the deserts ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.