It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יא,א גמרא

or drops Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? all Behold! why do I have Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was a Tanna taught: ??? It is because of this: ??? the daughter of ??? She but: salt ??? She I would say ??? and if a Tanna taught: salt that is not ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) from the beginning ??? except The fistful of a meal-offering ??? but: Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) from the beginning I would say ??? because of where they said The fistful of a meal-offering ??? or permission ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of It is because of this: lacking ??? Is it not enough for him It is because of this: ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? from the trapping of Abaye said to him: to Raba How so? ??? He said to him: ??? -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to cubits -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to ??? except ??? the accompanying handful of flour fill ??? so that that it should not be lacking and after this erasing ??? a small one ??? in what way does does he act? Rav said ??? son of ??? Rav said ??? three ??? until ??? on ??? and the accompanying handful of flour Another teaching is like this: fill ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: ??? If it was ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: fill ??? How so? ??? three ??? on ??? and the accompanying handful of flour ??? erasing ??? upwards ??? a small one downwards and this is the blessing of the Service Difficult is that were in the Temple ??? And naught else ??? except This is One ??? that were in the Temple Thus said Rabbi ??? This is obvious! for me fill ??? he is required Rav ??? What then does it mean when it says from ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? is more What then does it mean when it says The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Rav Pappa said: This is obvious! for me fill ??? he is required Rav ??? What then? from ??? What then? ??? sacrifice -- this refers to next to -- this refers to What then? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. he is required Rav ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? implements of in the case of ??? or, perhaps, ??? in its midst in the case of there is not in this case. The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. he is required Master, son of Rav Ashi ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? in its midst in the case of ??? or, perhaps, ??? in the case of there is not in this case. The question remains suspended and cannot be answered.

דף יא,א משנה

How so? he makes ??? ??? on ??? eight lacking eight ??? is invalid

דף יא,א גמרא

How so? ??? eight Thus said Rabbi Eliezer For example, ??? to it two ??? For example, ??? of it oil ??? and oil ??? And if you say oil ??? and oil ??? No. ??? He disagreed with this Rav ??? son of ??? Except I can object with text from here: Minchah-offering of a sinner ??? of it oil in what way does It concerns itself If it was ??? this one ??? to it If it was ??? this one is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? to it oil immediately ??? to it oil A general principle: Those who are ill ??? and R' Eliezer No. ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: No. ??? but: ??? to it two ??? Because and that one Look, ??? and that one Look, ??? I would say No. ??? Come and learn from this. ??? for him to R' Eliezer this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Raba ??? What is the purpose of teaching: ??? eight Let the Tanna teach: ??? to it oil but how do you reconcile that with this teaching Come and learn from this. ??? to it two ??? The Rabbis taught ??? on drops one is invalid on two ??? is valid these are the words of Rabbi Yehudah. Rabbi Shimon says: on drops one is valid less than from here is invalid

דף יא,ב גמרא

For it was taught: ??? Shimon ??? the accompanying handful of flour frankincense ??? Any thing that was is invalid, It was taught by drops Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? Any thing that was is invalid, And if you wish, I would say here, ??? with the Minchah here, ??? in its own right R' Yitzchak said son of Joseph that R' Yochanan said three It is a disagreement In the matter ??? reasoned the accompanying handful of flour ??? and the accompanying handful of flour in the rear of And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned the accompanying handful of flour ??? and a second person ??? in the rear of and Rabbi Shimon reasoned the accompanying handful of flour ??? and drops one in the rear of ??? the written Torah one do they expound, (Lev. 6) and all Watch out for leading vav the frankincense who on the Minchah ??? reasoned until ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) from the beginning And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned all And even if one drops ??? drops after and Rabbi Shimon No. he expounds. and R' Yitzchak said son of Joseph that R' Yochanan said It is a disagreement ??? with the Minchah but: ??? in its own right ??? the accompanying handful of flour ??? and the accompanying handful of flour in the rear of ??? It is necessary to teach this who on the Minchah ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) yes. in its own right No. and R' Yitzchak said son of Joseph that R' Yochanan said It is a disagreement ??? with the Minchah but: ??? the words of all are two ??? and a second person ??? in the rear of This is obvious! What would you have said? immediately ??? bread We come to compare as it was on the Minchah is comparable Come and learn from this. They disagreed about this, Rabbi Ami And Rabbi Isaac ??? One says It is a disagreement ??? with the Minchah but: ??? in its own right the words of all are the accompanying handful of flour ??? and the accompanying handful of flour in the rear of and one says ??? thus in the same way It is a disagreement ??? this one ??? is valid For it was taught: ??? is invalid he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama For example, ??? to it two ??? and he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? to it two ??? one from them before ??? No. ??? after ??? and he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama ??? four ??? for two ??? and he loses it two from them before ??? No. ??? after ??? this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, why do I have we were ??? What would you have said? immediately ??? the accompanying handful of flour ??? immediately arrived ??? like who ??? is comparable Come and learn from this.

דף יא,ב משנה

The fistful of a meal-offering the Minchah to eat ??? outside or an olive's volume ??? outside to offer ??? outside or an olive's volume ??? outside or to offer ??? outside is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, to eat ??? tomorrow or an olive's volume ??? tomorrow to offer ??? tomorrow or an olive's volume ??? tomorrow or to offer Watch out for leading vav frankincense tomorrow

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.