It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יב,א משנה

an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. This is the general rule: all The fistful of a meal-offering ??? he gives in a vessel ??? to eat a thing ??? to eat and to offer a thing ??? to offer with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. but only ??? the releasing ??? How so? was sacrificed the releasing ??? he gave in a vessel ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time or ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time he gave in a vessel ??? or ??? and gave in a vessel ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time ??? the releasing ??? How so? No. was sacrificed the releasing ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place he gave in a vessel ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time or ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time he gave in a vessel ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place or ??? he gave in a vessel ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated place ??? that did not have was sacrificed the releasing ??? Minchah-offering of a sinner and Minchah-offering of ??? that did not have ??? he gave in a vessel ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time or ??? with the intent of consuming the meat outside its designated time he gave in a vessel ??? that did not have ??? or ??? and gave in a vessel ??? that did not have ??? that did not have was sacrificed the releasing ??? to eat an olive's volume outside an olive's volume tomorrow an olive's volume tomorrow an olive's volume outside ??? olive tree outside ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? olive tree outside is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, R' Yehudah said: This is the general rule: if ??? to the east ??? the place an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. if ??? the place to the east ??? is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, ??? say both this and this is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision,

דף יב,א גמרא

They posed this difficulty: according to the words of One who says ??? between ??? the accompanying handful of flour about them ??? to us ??? are forbidden in cases regarding eating What then? ??? them ??? something the laws of misappropriation of sacred things Rav Huna said even Rabbi Akivah for he said: sprinkling is effective ??? to take out that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי he would exit ??? is invalid, ??? Another thing: he but: its lack ??? he Watch out for leading vav And ??? not for him ??? He said to him: Raba ??? Even if ??? for he said: sprinkling is not effective to be taken out. that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי he would exit ??? inside but: its lack ??? inside ??? for him ??? Rabba said: ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita The fistful of a meal-offering the Minchah to eat ??? outside or an olive's volume ??? outside and Rabbi Chiyya taught The fistful of a meal-offering the Minchah and not It was taught by or an olive's volume What is the reason מאי טעמא No. It was taught by or an olive's volume Is this not For example, ??? them ??? And because of the fact ??? implements of ??? No. he would say over for him

דף יב,ב גמרא

or an olive's volume ??? also to eat ??? No. It was taught by or an olive's volume And we have learned at the end of the teaching, an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. Perhaps, ??? them ??? He said to him Abaye No. So, with whom does it agree? ??? She For it was taught in a baraita The fistful of a meal-offering the frankincense ??? the meal-offering of the priests the meal-offering of the anointed priest and the meal-offering associated with a libation ??? from them an olive's volume outside he is liable and Rabbi Eliezer exempts until ??? all of it immediately ??? No. he would say over for him or an olive's volume ??? outside ??? also No. he would say over for him or an olive's volume If it was Rabbi Eliezer This to offer ??? to offer ??? should bring himself For it was taught in a baraita The fistful of a meal-offering the frankincense ??? one from them outside he is liable and Rabbi Eliezer exempts until ??? both No. ??? except ??? a sinner ??? a Tanna taught: ??? the accompanying handful of flour ??? a sinner yes. and thus When Rav Dimi came R' Elazar said the accompanying handful of flour ??? a sinner he and Rabbi Eliezer She he returns Rabba said: Is this not the validity She that they said as it is taught: (Lev. 24) and that which was sanctified for Temple use holy offerings he ??? One from them ??? all of them ??? this one was it taken out Behold! That there are ??? one ??? for him for he said: sprinkling is effective ??? to take out Watch out for leading vav !! And the mishna's view is that of Rabbi Akiva and he said ??? No. He said to him Abaye who The tanna teaches: this one was it taken out Perhaps this one ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? but: was it taken out No. and R' Eliezer She for he said: sprinkling is not effective to be taken out. In justice, he ??? for him ??? also was it taken out and This case where he teaches ??? Thus can we come and learn from this. for even in the case where ??? inside does not take effect for him ??? but: Rabbi Akivah for he said: sprinkling is effective ??? to take out Even if its lack also ??? for him ???

דף יב,ב משנה

to eat ??? olive tree and to offer ??? olive tree is valid that do not food ??? combine together

דף יב,ב גמרא

The reason is ??? and to offer this one to eat and to eat a thing whose way is not to eat ??? But the beginning of the teaching, to eat a thing ??? to eat and to offer a thing ??? to offer a thing ??? to eat yes. whose way is not to eat No. Which Tanna taught: Thus said Rabbi ??? So, with whom does it agree? ??? She for he said: "If one was thinking about eating them improperly, it voids the offering." ??? a person ??? An altar of ??? An altar of ??? a person For it was taught in a baraita The fistful of a meal-offering the Minchah to eat a thing whose way is not to eat and to offer a thing whose way is not to offer is valid ??? invalidates it Abaye said Even if you say rabbis No. you say this one to eat and to eat a thing whose way is not to eat except I would say this one to eat and to eat a thing ??? to eat and And what can we come and learn from this? this one clearly and explicitly The tanna teaches: to it to eat an olive's volume outside and an olive's volume tomorrow an olive's volume tomorrow and an olive's volume outside ??? olive tree outside ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? olive tree outside is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision,

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.