It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יג,א גמרא

this one Watch out for leading vav And, too, why do I have If it was to eat and to eat a thing whose way is not to eat Come and learn from this. ??? olive tree outside ??? olive tree tomorrow is invalid, this one ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? olive tree tomorrow ??? If it was to eat and to offer ??? Back to the main body of the text: ??? that at the beginning of the teaching ??? Just as to eat and to eat a thing whose way is not to eat is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. ??? to eat and to offer ??? yes. to eat and to offer ??? for him ??? I thought to say there i.e., in another mishna he that is not For ??? But here, in this case, ??? For ??? For ??? I would say ??? Come and learn from this.

דף יג,א משנה

The fistful of a meal-offering the Minchah to eat ??? or to offer ??? tomorrow give thanks Rabbi Yosei in this that he was an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. to offer ??? tomorrow Rabbi Yosei says: is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, but the sages say an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. They said to him: Just as he sleeps this from ??? He said to them: ??? one frankincense It is not from the Minchah

דף יג,א גמרא

why do I have ??? give thanks Rabbi Yosei ??? It is because of this: that he came he is required ??? at the end of the teaching, to offer ??? tomorrow R' Yosei says is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, What would you have said? The reason is of R' Yosi It is because of this: that thus reasoned yes. ??? permits And even if But the beginning of the teaching, also

דף יג,ב גמרא

Come and learn from this. ??? to offer ??? tomorrow Rabbi Yosei says: is invalid, And there is no meaning to the word in it ??? he said Reish Lakish: says he was R' Yosi yes. permits ??? the releasing and thus You say with two ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense of bread ??? that do not permits ??? the releasing What then does it mean when it says and thus You say What would you have said? The reason is of R' Yosi ??? It is because of this: ??? She but: with two ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? I would say ??? Come and learn from this. and who seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? The reason is of R' Yosi ??? Is this not It is because of this: ??? She Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: at the end of the teaching, They said to him: Just as ??? from ??? He said to them: ??? one frankincense It is not from the Minchah What then does it mean when it says It is not from the Minchah It is not ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? so that thus it will be ??? them the accompanying handful of flour ??? the accompanying handful of flour No. ??? So, here, is essential. to it ??? except If it was he is required This ??? and if he is required This ??? And the rabbbis For say yes. permits ??? the releasing ??? one from ??? to eat from his fellow tomorrow that you said both ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case that is not ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? but: in a case ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? he is equivalent. Thus said Rabbi ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? is invalid, What is the reason מאי טעמא Thus said Rabbi ??? It is because of this: ??? of it his reasoning is ??? that did not have ??? her name ??? is invalid Rav said ??? Even We also ??? This is the general rule: all The fistful of a meal-offering he gives in a vessel ??? This is satisfactory the accompanying handful of flour we were ??? also we were ??? we were ??? except he gives in a vessel What then does it mean when it says ??? does he act? Shall I say It is because of this: ??? who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna ipso facto Here in this case, ??? and pointed out a contradiction. except It is because of this: ??? that is not ??? for him that is not a slave to it the blessing of the Service ??? She on ??? to it ??? So, here, immediately that is not ??? to it that is not a slave to it the blessing of the Service ??? She on ??? to it For ??? No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and that he came it is a problem to you there i.e., in another mishna ipso facto Here in this case, ??? and pointed out a contradiction. ??? both of them. the sanctity of implements of he What do I have to learn from ipso facto What do I have to learn from ??? and pointed out a contradiction.

דף יג,ב משנה

??? two ??? to eat One from ??? tomorrow ??? two ??? to eat one from ??? tomorrow Rabbi Yosei says: that specific ??? that specific ??? upon it an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. and the second is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, But the sages say: both this and this an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account.

דף יג,ב גמרא

Rav Huna said says he was Rabbi Yosei ??? one who recites a blessing of ??? No. ??? of ??? What is the reason? If you wish, I would say reason out the logic. And if you wish, I would say he read If you wish, I would say reason out the logic. No. is preferable, ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And even ??? one ??? who ??? for him completely And if you wish, I would say he read (Lev. 7) ??? from him answer ??? from him and not from his fellow ??? Rav ??? to Rav Huna. ??? In reality lit: In the world Watch out for leading vav And there is not the penalty of excision, until ??? in the amount like an olive ??? yes. in one from them No. with whom does it agree? Shall I say rabbis even in one from them also except This is obvious! Rabbi Yosei If you say, This is satisfactory it is treated like a single body, and because of this ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.