It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יד,א גמרא

except If you say, two ??? who ??? So, with whom does it agree? Rabbi She as it is taught: ??? ??? to eat ??? olive tree sickens -- this refers to and thus his fellow to eat ??? olive tree sickens -- this refers to Rabbi says says I for this is valid The reason is for he said: ??? but: he said an olive's volume ??? And Rabbi who follow the reasoning ??? ??? If it was who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis Even if in one from them also If it was who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi ??? In reality lit: In the world who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis and not you say until ??? except ??? until ??? and even in one from them and To exclude ??? for he said: ??? permits Come and learn from this. that is not If so, Watch out for leading vav And what do we mean by "always"? If you say, This is satisfactory ??? and It is Rabbi Yosei and To exclude ??? and According to Rabbinic law, ??? we were for he says In reality lit: In the world except If you say, rabbis and To exclude ??? Watch out for leading vav And what do we mean by "always"? And furthermore, this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Rav Ashi Come and hear: Rabbi says It is because of this: Rabbi Yosei ??? In the matter ??? outside ??? In the matter ??? inside No. ??? How so? He was standing outside and he said Behold, I am slaughtering ??? tomorrow No. ??? outside In the matter ??? inside He was standing inside and he said ??? from this ??? to offer ??? tomorrow ??? tomorrow No. ??? inside In the matter ??? outside He was standing outside and he said Behold, I am slaughtering ??? tomorrow and to offer ??? tomorrow ??? outside In the matter ??? outside ??? What then does it mean when it says Shall I say ??? blood blood who ??? For it was taught in a mishna: these items that do not we are guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless The fistful of a meal-offering the frankincense the incense the meal-offering of the priests and the meal-offering associated with a libation the meal-offering of the anointed priest and the blood except This is obvious! ??? meat now for just as there i.e., in another mishna that is not He accounts for of him. in the case of the flesh. ??? R' Yosi said ??? Here in this case, ??? of him. ??? not all the more so? ??? one who recites a blessing ??? one who recites a blessing ??? And furthermore, Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't Ravina say Come and hear: The fistful of a meal-offering the Minchah to eat ??? or to offer ??? tomorrow give thanks Rabbi Yosei ??? but we become liable to excision on its account. to offer ??? What then does it mean when it says Shall I say ??? the accompanying handful of flour the accompanying handful of flour who ??? For it was taught in a mishna: these items that do not we are guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless The fistful of a meal-offering etc. except This is obvious! ??? now for just as there i.e., in another mishna that is not He accounts for in them? ???

דף יד,ב גמרא

??? Here in this case, ??? in them? ??? not all the more so? except that R' Yochanan said ??? of R' Yosi the scripture ??? one the scripture ??? two ??? one ??? two ??? for he said: the Merciful One this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? one ??? two ??? he is required Rabbi Yochanan ??? a thangkgiving-offering What then? ??? What then? a Tanna taught: for him Rav Tachlifa from the West and thus You say ??? a thangkgiving-offering and thus You say ??? The Rabbis taught in the hour of ??? to eat ??? olive tree or in the hour ??? to eat ??? olive tree an invalidating act nevertheless because of ??? combine together that it is possible that they said ??? permit yes. ??? No. and there are that they said ??? and how much more so Behold! ??? Really? Hey, isn't it the case that It was taught by Levi four ??? yes. ??? Rabba said: There is no difficulty לא קשיא this one Rabbi this one rabbis as it is taught: ??? ??? to eat ??? olive tree sickens -- this refers to and thus his fellow to eat ??? olive tree sickens -- this refers to Rabbi says says I for this is valid He said to him Abaye I will say ??? for him to Rabbi ??? permits ??? food all of it permits ??? food who ??? for him Raba said to him son of Rav ??? and if it has to Rabbi all of it permits ??? food ??? permits ??? food because all of it permits ??? food for it is the case that Rabbi Yosei ??? And the rabbbis ??? R' Yosi ??? For it was taught in a baraita to offer ??? tomorrow Rabbi Yosei says: is invalid, And there is not the penalty of excision, but the sages say an invalidating act nevertheless and we are guilty on its account he is spiritually cut off And the rabbbis also ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? regarding the handful of meal-offering and not ??? and not regarding the handful of meal-offering Rabbi Meir says: an invalidating act nevertheless but we become liable to excision on its account. but the sages say Watch out for leading vav And there is not the penalty of excision, until ??? in all the releasing He said to him thus now This is satisfactory there i.e., in another mishna ??? Rabbi Yosei the accompanying handful of flour ??? because the accompanying handful of flour ??? rabbis ??? the accompanying handful of flour because the accompanying handful of flour ??? a sinner frankincense because Watch out for leading vav frankincense ??? also ??? because ??? his fellow ??? because ??? his fellow except Here in this case, who that it is possible ??? permits ??? food in reality ??? Here, too, ??? is a law established by the Rabbis and because of this he it is taught at the end "We thank..." the sages According to Rabbi Meir, ??? a sinner and Minchah-offering of ??? regarding the handful of meal-offering ??? and we are guilty on its account he is spiritually cut off ??? he the releasing this one why do I have ??? A general principle: This is obvious! who that it is possible permits other than this except Is this not Thus can we come and learn from this. ??? It is because of this: That there are the accompanying handful of flour ??? a sinner ??? to him

דף יד,ב משנה

??? One from ??? or one from ??? Rabbi Yehudah says both they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? that do not sacrifice ??? But the sages say: ??? shall eat

דף יד,ב גמרא

R' Elazar said It is a disagreement Before the act of sprinkling, but: After the act of sprinkling, the words of all are ??? shall eat Before the act of sprinkling, in what way ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? on ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.