It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף טו,א גמרא

rabbis reason that ??? on ??? And Rabbi Yehudah reasoned yes. ??? on ??? He said to him Rav Huna the son of of Rav he gave for Rav, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that we go up ??? on ??? as it is taught: ??? one from ??? Rabbi Yehudah says both ??? on account of that do not sacrifice ??? But the sages say: ??? And furthermore, Rav Ashi said Come and hear: R' Yehuda says: even ??? one tamei and all ??? on account of that do not ??? and here in this other case, What then does it mean when it says ??? that it is possible And furthermore, Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't Ravina say Come and hear: ??? One from ??? or One from ??? Rabbi Yehudah says both they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? on account of that do not sacrifice ??? But the sages say: ??? shall eat and if ??? on account of that do not ??? on ??? should bring himself except that R' Yochanan said ??? he in his mouth of Rabbi Yehudah that do not sacrifice ???

דף טו,א משנה

The thangkgiving-offering ??? ??? he does not ??? The thangkgiving-offering How so? ??? The thangkgiving-offering to eat from it tomorrow She ??? to eat from ??? tomorrow ??? and The thangkgiving-offering It is not ??? ??? he does not ??? ??? How so? ??? ??? to eat from them tomorrow are these ??? to eat ??? tomorrow ??? are not ???

דף טו,א גמרא

What is the reason מאי טעמא Shall I say It is because of this: of Rav ??? for he said: Rav Kahana from where do we learn ??? a thangkgiving-offering ??? a thangkgiving-offering as it is said (Lev. 7) and he sacrificed on zevach-offering The thangkgiving-offering ??? If so, ??? also This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction bread ??? a thangkgiving-offering a thangkgiving-offering No. ??? bread but how do you reconcile that with this teaching where he teaches ??? ??? he does not ??? ??? bread in a case ??? except ??? we were The reason is bread ??? a thangkgiving-offering And there is no meaning to the word a thangkgiving-offering ??? bread ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? and It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was we had heard a thangkgiving-offering there i.e., in another mishna he and so when ??? No. ??? a thangkgiving-offering It is because of this: that is not ??? this to this ??? but: ??? this to this ??? I would say For ??? also ??? ??? brought this very question The thangkgiving-offering to eat an olive's volume from it and war tomorrow What then? ??? a thangkgiving-offering No. ??? for me now all of it war No. ??? from it and war ??? For ??? for me ??? bread who ??? a thangkgiving-offering ??? or did not say to him Even ??? and The thangkgiving-offering It is not ??? But why? Let us say, ??? for just as ??? yes. ??? that comes ??? and not ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? and who say ??? For This ??? For it was taught: It once happened on the first

דף טו,ב גמרא

??? of his fellow ??? came It once happened before the sages and we prohibit ??? and they permitted ??? But why? Let us say, ??? he for just as ??? he does not ??? that comes ??? and not ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna ??? Torah ??? it was ??? No. ??? sowing on ??? that are ??? the remainder of ??? According to Rabbinic law, he ??? This that He performs ??? rabbis This that is not does he act? ??? No. ??? rabbis But here, in this case, Let us say, is a kal vachomer and there is someone who teaches this as referring ??? Rabbi Eliezer brought this very question ??? ??? to eat an olive's volume from them ??? What then? ??? No. ??? for me now all of it ??? No. ??? from them ??? For ??? for me ??? bread who ??? or No. He said to him Even ??? are not ??? But why? Let us say, is a kal vachomer for just as ??? he does not ??? that comes ??? and not ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? and who say is a kal vachomer For This ??? For it was taught: It once happened on the first ??? of his fellow ??? and etc. But why? Let us say, is a kal vachomer Just as ??? he does not ??? that comes ??? and not ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? thus now there i.e., in another mishna ??? Torah the remainder of ??? According to Rabbinic law, he ??? This ??? rabbis that is not a slave ??? No. ??? rabbis But here, in this case, Let us say, is a kal vachomer one ??? to it ??? all the more so ??? and one ??? to it ??? he ??? this to this ??? but: a thangkgiving-offering that is not ??? this to this ??? No. Rabbi Abba ??? he is required to it thus R' Elazar brought this very question ??? ??? to eat an olive's volume from his fellow tomorrow What then? his fellow ??? and not ??? or, perhaps, bread ??? for him He said to him: ??? one from ??? to eat from him tomorrow he an invalidating act nevertheless and his fellow is valid to eat from his fellow tomorrow both are proper Perhaps, his fellow ??? Perhaps ??? and he said his fellow ???

דף טו,ב משנה

??? ??? in a vessel These are the words of Rabbi Meir. ??? are not ??? ??? How so? ??? ??? to eat from him tomorrow he ??? tomorrow ??? he does not ???

דף טו,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? livestock we are guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless because of ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. They said to him: According to Rabbi Meir, Is it not the case that a person sends ??? the day ??? until ??? days He said to them: Even I do not say except ??? with ??? He said to him ??? after Rabba said: his reasoning is ??? a thangkgiving-offering The Rabbis taught ??? oil of one suffering from tzara'at we are guilty on its account It is because of this: an invalidating act nevertheless because of ??? a guilt-offering ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir They said to him: to Rabbi Meir Is it not the case that a person sends ??? the day ??? and until ??? days He said to them: Even I do not say except ??? with ??? after Rabba said: his reasoning is Rabbi Meir ??? a thangkgiving-offering

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.