It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כא,א גמרא

??? pieces of wood ??? as it is taught: but: the wine and the blood ??? yes. ??? salt with whom does it agree? If it was Rabbi it is a problem pieces of wood If it was rabbis it is a problem incense This a Tanna taught: he as it is taught: Rabbi Yishmael his son of R' Yochanan son of ??? says Just as ??? a thing ??? and ascend ??? on the outside altar Even any thing ??? and ascend ??? on the outside altar they have fulfilled the mitzvah pieces of wood that do not ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah blood and wine that do not ??? incense that is not on the outside altar except The reason is ??? he read ??? this one Is this not thus then I might incorrectly say: blood that salt should request immediately ??? he departs for him ??? blood for he said: ??? Rabbi Chanina said: blood ??? he does not transgresses upon it and Rav Yehudah he said ??? blood ??? he does not transgresses upon it and Rav Yehudah that are his he said Abraham ??? yes. at them." It is because of this: ??? What would you have said? ??? of it a smidge lit: a whatever ??? in reality ??? Back to the main body of the text: he said ??? Rabbi Chanina said: blood ??? he does not transgresses upon it ??? Raba ??? he said to it about this teaching ??? Abaye ??? the blood and he ate or ??? ??? he is liable There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, ??? No. he returns ??? he returns ??? also Let us say, Because ??? for it is the case that Rabbi brought this very question with whom does it agree? ??? Yochanan blood ??? and he ate What then? He said to him: Because ??? He was silent. He said to him: Perhaps certainly here, ??? here, ??? he said ??? the validity for he said: Rav Chisda blood ??? and he ate he is liable (Lev. 5) ??? and gave the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? son of ??? he ??? and he ate is exempt and immersed ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says and that one Is this not son of immersion ??? he and Raba that are his he said even ??? and he ate he is liable Because and opposite him ??? the outermost ones Rav Pappa said: Therefore, blood a donkey ??? and he ate he is liable Because and opposite him ??? the outermost ones Rav said ??? he said ??? blood between ??? between ??? separating They challenged him from this teaching: the blood ??? and the honey ??? moist ones are not ??? There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one that is not ??? for what he came to account for that which was taught with salt It is possible ??? Scripture states: ??? If it was ??? It is possible ??? salt Scripture states: with salt (Lev. 2) and you shall not cause there to be a lack of salt that comes salt that is not ??? and What is -- this refers to salt ??? And from where do we learn ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and did not find salt ??? salt ??? Scripture states: ??? Any thing that was ??? from all a place ??? and even on Shabbat ??? and even ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbah said son of ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: It is possible ??? Abaye said to him: If so, ??? should bring himself except Abayye said: It is possible ??? He said to him: Raba If so, ??? should bring himself except Rabba said: It is possible ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Ashi said It is possible He shall give" in it ??? Therefore, scripture states: ??? How so? he makes sends ??? he gives upon it salt and he returns ??? he gives upon it salt ??? Abayye said: and thus ???

דף כא,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: salt for upon regarding ??? the offering is subject to the laws of misappropriation. ??? of An altar of the laws of misappropriation do not apply And Rav says gifts What scripture supports this position? (Ezek. 43) ??? before Hashem ??? the priests. upon them salt ??? an elevation-offering ??? It was taught there: on ??? and on ??? the priests. ??? of them Shmuel said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: as regard to eating, No. ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? to eat ??? holy offerings now ??? skins holy offerings ??? holy offerings No. ??? as it is taught: ??? You say "In three places ??? placed ??? and atop ??? on its head of An altar of ??? skins holy offerings atop ??? ??? on its head of An altar of ??? The fistful of a meal-offering the frankincense the incense the meal-offering of the priests the meal-offering of the anointed priest and the meal-offering associated with a libation and An elevation-offering of a bird: Rather, what can we conclude? ??? And what does it mean when it says as regard to eating, food ??? Those who are ill This is obvious! What then does it mean when it says They asked there i.e., in another mishna even though As Mar said: ??? Those who are ill and terumah so that that it should be ??? on ??? even thus salt ??? No. ??? them Ravina said to Rav Ashi: So, here, ??? For if it was You might have thought What then does it mean when it says ??? The reason is ??? a court this one No. ??? a court No. now to Israel ??? to the priests No. ??? as it is taught: It is possible One who says Behold! by the the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? salt from the midst of his house like the way ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense from the midst of his house It would be a logical inference it is said ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? salt and it is said ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense Just as Watch out for leading vav frankincense from the midst of his house Even salt from the midst of his house or ??? on the way -- this refers to it is said ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? salt and it is said ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? pieces of wood Just as pieces of wood is from that which is belonging to ??? Even salt is from that which is belonging to ??? to whoever ??? a thing ??? in all ??? in all ??? and do not ??? Watch out for leading vav frankincense that is not ??? in all ??? or ??? on the way -- this refers to ??? a thing that comes ??? in a vessel one ??? that comes ??? in a vessel one and do not ??? pieces of wood those that are not have come ??? in a vessel one Scripture states: (in Numbers 18) covenant salt the world he and elsewhere in the scripture he says (Lev. 24) ??? the Children of Israel covenant the world Just as there is from that which is belonging to ??? Even here, is from that which is belonging to ??? He said to him: Rav ??? to Rav Ashi thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav ??? the son of of Rav This No. ??? except ??? For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Yehuda said ??? son of ??? all a priest ??? he does not a sinner He said to him: Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai No. For rather, all a priest that is not ??? a sinner except ??? the written Torah this for themselves (Lev. 6) and all Minchah-offering of a priest ??? It may not be eaten Because ??? and two ??? and bread ??? She how they are eaten ??? immediately ??? No. ??? For ??? also a sinner he that he came ??? Those who are ill ??? You might have thought that I would say that

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.