It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כג,א גמרא

Rabba said: his reasoning is Rabbi Yehudah Any thing that was ??? and Another thing: ??? ??? that is not but when it is not ??? Rabbah upon it ??? it was said: the accompanying handful of flour ??? a sinner ??? Rabbi Yochanan says is invalid, ??? he said should it itself ??? For it is written (Lev. 5) No. ??? upon it oil and They do not give it upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense This certain individual that did not have ??? to it oil ??? R' Yochanan ??? Rabbi Yehudah says No. ??? Is this not the accompanying handful of flour ??? a sinner ??? regarding the handful of meal-offering ??? No. Minchah-offering of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that clearly and explicitly The tanna teaches: to it Minchah-offering of ??? ??? Rabbi Yehudah says No. ??? to it he is required Raba the accompanying handful of flour ??? atop pieces of wood What then? ??? we go up ??? or Is this not ??? Ravina said to Rav Ashi: Is this not we were of Rabbi Yochanan ??? in which is not an olive's volume ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: he is liable ??? he said is exempt Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: he is liable ??? we go up ??? and Reish Lakish: he said is exempt ??? we go up Is this not ??? to R' Yochanan ??? to R' Yochanan Up to this point, No. ??? R' Yochanan said: there i.e., in another mishna except ??? he but: This ??? he No. or, perhaps, Even if ??? No. ??? he said except ??? a thing ??? he and if ??? Is this not a commandment ??? but: oil ??? son of ??? he No. or, perhaps, there is no difference The question remains suspended and cannot be answered.

דף כג,א משנה

two menuchot offerings: that did not have ??? -- this refers to ??? if It is possible ??? in its own right ??? in its own right ??? And if not, ??? the accompanying handful of flour ??? at Minchah that did not have ??? No. ??? and if ??? -- this refers to ??? an elevation-offering ??? -- this refers to that did not have ??? No. an elevation-offering ??? it was combined ??? or ??? of ??? No. ??? and if ??? an elevation-offering ???

דף כג,א גמרא

Rav Chisdah said roadkill ??? where it is not possible ??? roadkill ??? not nullifcation ??? where it is possble ??? And Rabbi ??? he said all for whom it is possible to be ??? he does not wasted and all where it is not possible to him to be ??? wasted who follow the reasoning ??? ??? If it was who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis this one They said: we go up he that is not ??? but: ??? wasted If it was who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah Hey, isn't it the case that

דף כג,ב גמרא

Rabbi Yehudah according to ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes and this and this ??? he except who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Chiyya for it teaches: Rabbi Chiyya roadkill ??? -- this refers to ??? Rabbi Chiyya who follow the reasoning ??? ??? If it was who follow the reasoning ??? is a law established by the Rabbis this one They said: we go up he that is not ??? this one ??? and if According to the opinion of R' Yehudah all ??? according to R' Yehudah No. ??? In reality lit: In the world According to the opinion of R' Yehudah And so ??? R' Yehudah said ??? No. wasted that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case where it is possible for him ??? but: in a case where it is not possible for him ??? wasted In this case, ??? of Rav Chisda reasoned according to nullify do we go? and R' Chaninah reasoned according to wasted do we go? We have learnt in a Mishna: two menuchot offerings: that did not have ??? -- this refers to ??? if It is possible ??? in its own right ??? in its own right ??? And if not, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, immediately ??? for him ??? Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one it was. for him ??? and not ??? with whom does it agree? If it was rabbis this one They said: we go up he that is not ??? this one ??? wasted except This is obvious! Rabbi Yehudah This is satisfactory ??? according to wasted do we go? wasted you shall ??? are they, them ??? For Behold! except ??? according to nullify do we go? ??? does anyone lit., who comes to are they, ??? Let us say, ??? of Rav ??? that is not like Rabbi Chiyya ??? that is not ??? there i.e., in another mishna It is like that which was said by Rabbi Zeira for thus said Rabbi Zeira ??? regarding the handful of meal-offering ??? Just as ??? regarding the handful of meal-offering yes. The fistful of a meal-offering nullify his fellow Even ??? yes. ??? The fistful of a meal-offering Come and hear: The fistful of a meal-offering ??? at Minchah that did not have ??? No. ??? and if ??? -- this refers to ??? is credited lit, rises ??? -- this refers to that did not have ??? It is not credited ??? and not ??? for him ??? with whom does it agree? If it was rabbis this one They said: we go up he that is not ??? this one ??? except This is obvious! R' Yehudah This is satisfactory ??? according to nullify do we go? nullify you shall ??? Look, ??? of him you shall for him ??? No. wasted except ??? according to wasted do we go? the accompanying handful of flour does anyone lit., who comes to you shall ??? Let us say, that is not like Rabbi Chiyya Here, too, ??? Zeira Come and hear: it was combined ??? of ??? No. ??? and if ??? is credited lit, rises ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, that is not you shall nullify ??? and not ??? for him ??? with whom does it agree? If it was rabbis and etc. R' Zayra said: ??? regarding the handful of meal-offering ??? Just as ??? regarding the handful of meal-offering yes. the accompanying handful of flour nullify his fellow Even ??? yes. ??? The fistful of a meal-offering Come and hear: ??? and with all varieties of ??? is valid ??? She except ??? You might have thought ??? to it ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: according to wasted do we go? ??? you shall ??? you shall to it ??? except for one for he said: according to nullify do we go? ??? does anyone lit., who comes to are they, ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? that is not ??? to it ??? She and not nullification ??? also where he teaches ??? She except ??? Learn from this For ??? Rav Kahana ??? to the children of Rabbi Chiyya ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.