It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כה,א משנה

??? The fistful of a meal-offering and bring offerings ??? he has fulfilled his obligation and bring offerings yes. ??? on ??? and does not ??? on that is coming out

דף כה,א גמרא

The rabbis taught: (Ex. 28) and exalted. ??? iniquity ??? And so whichever iniquity he ??? if you say iniquity an invalidating act nevertheless Behold! Already it is said No. ??? iniquity notar Behold! Already it is said No. ??? this one he does not ??? except iniquity ??? (in the case of a community offering) He disagreed with this Rabbi Zeira I would say iniquity he would exit ??? Abaye said to him: Scripture states: (Ex. 28) ??? to them before Hashem iniquity ??? Hashem yes. iniquity ??? No. He disagreed with this Rabbi ??? I would say iniquity ??? by day ??? Abaye said to him: Scripture states: iniquity iniquity that he was in it ??? To exclude Yom Kippur. ??? he Rav Ashi said: iniquity ??? and not iniquity ??? He said to him: Rav ??? the son of of Rav This to Rav Ashi And there are those who say it was Rav ??? the son of of Rav ??? to Rav Ashi and so go ahead and say iniquity the master of ??? As Mar said: they shall be allowed to die of natural causes ??? And there is no meaning to the word they shall be allowed to die of natural causes ??? He said to him: upon you Scripture states: No. ??? (Lev. 22) For No. ??? it shall be ??? The rabbis taught: blood that became tamei, ??? in error ??? with intent No. ??? Regarding what matters are we speaking? privately but: (in the case of a community offering) between in error between with intent ??? between in error between with intent between ??? between ???

דף כה,ב גמרא

No. ??? We challenge that from the following baraita on Just as ??? on the blood and on ??? and on ??? that became tamei, between in error between with intent between ??? between ??? between privately between (in the case of a community offering) Rav Yosef said There is no difficulty. this one R' Yosi this one rabbis as it is taught: yes. ??? from ??? on ??? and if he separated terumah in error its terumah terumah with intent yes. its terumah terumah R' Yosei says between in error between with intent its terumah terumah I will say ??? for him to R' ??? that is not ??? on ??? who ??? for him For it was taught: R' Eliezer says: ??? on ??? Rabbi Yosei says: yes. ??? on ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: yes. ??? on ??? Rabbi Yosei says: ??? on ??? He disagreed with this Rav Sheishet and who seeks ??? to it For it was taught: It is possible meat that became tamei, before the sprinkling of blood: ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 7) all tahor shall eat meat ??? who It may be eaten meat An altar of ??? who ??? upon it ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? but when it is not ??? we are not guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? Or perhaps, except is eaten ??? we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? but when it is not is eaten ??? we are not guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? I who goes and that is coming out those that are not they are eaten ??? Scripture states: who ??? It is possible that I ??? ??? and ??? we were to us except Even ??? Scripture states: An altar of ??? for just as you see ??? those and to discharge the mitzvah those after ??? the scripture ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? I those ??? to them ??? and sends forth I those that did not have it was to them ??? meat that became tamei, before the sprinkling of blood: and he ate After the sprinkling of blood, On account of what we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? because of ??? yes. he would exit No. one ??? for him for he said: sprinkling is not effective to be taken out. Rabbi Eliezer And we have learned ??? on ??? except Rav Chisdah said There is no difficulty. this one Rabbi Eliezer this one rabbis I will say ??? for him to R' Eliezer ??? on ??? that is not ??? who ??? for him yes. so that thus it will be ??? for him to R' ??? for him to Rabbi Eliezer as it is taught: Rabbi Eliezer says: between in error between with intent its terumah terumah I will say ??? for him to Rabbi Eliezer from terumah ??? who ??? for him If so, this one ??? Ravina he said ??? between in error between with intent ??? in error ??? with intent No. ??? Rav ??? he said ??? between in error between with intent ??? in error ??? with intent No. ??? and for Rav, ??? where he teaches that became tamei, between in error between with intent This is what he means: ??? in error ??? between in error between with intent

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.