It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כז,א גמרא

??? it is written For ??? to you who follow the reasoning ??? ??? on ??? What then does it mean when it says So, here, on ??? or, perhaps, on ??? is equivalent ??? the altar of Just as there i.e., in another mishna on actually and really Even So, here, on actually and really The question remains suspended and cannot be answered.

דף כז,א משנה

The fistful of a meal-offering ??? is essential. the majority of his body ??? is essential. the majority of his body the wine ??? is essential. the majority of his body the oil ??? is essential. the majority of his body ??? and the oil ??? this one for that one The fistful of a meal-offering the frankincense ??? this one for that one

דף כז,א גמרא

What is the reason מאי טעמא Scripture states: (Lev. 2) fill ??? two times ??? is essential. the majority of his body What is the reason? Scripture states: (Lev. 2) ??? Any thing that was is invalid the wine ??? is essential. the majority of his body ??? the oil ??? is essential. the majority of his body ??? and Minchah-offering of ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 2) ??? lacking Any thing that was is invalid the oil ??? this one for that one ??? The fistful of a meal-offering the frankincense ??? this one for that one (Lev. 2) on all ??? (Lev. 6) and all Watch out for leading vav the frankincense who on the Minchah

דף כז,א משנה

two male goats of ??? this one for that one two ??? this one for that one two ??? indispensible this one for that one two ??? this one for that one two ??? this one for that one ??? this one for that one two heretics, ??? three ??? and four ??? and four ??? and four ??? this one for that one seven ??? indispensible this one for that one ??? for upon between the posts for upon ??? for upon the altar of gold indispensible this one for that one

דף כז,א גמרא

two male goats of ??? this one for that one ??? two ??? this one for that one ??? two ??? two ??? two ??? two heretics, ??? As it is written thus may he do it? three ??? four ??? As it is written (Lev. 7) on zevach-offering ??? and Mar said: ??? a Nazir and four ??? as it is written (Lev. 14) this ??? and four ??? (Lev. 23) ??? he was astonished Rav said ??? son of Raba They did not teach this לא שנו except that do not to him but: he has yes. ??? They challenged him from this teaching: four sectarians. ??? two from them doing fruits and two from them Watch out for leading vav And we do not make fruits ??? fruits ??? doing and those that do not doing fruits ??? fruits And there is no meaning to the word a person he would exit the hands of ??? of them until ??? all of them ??? One and thus Israel ??? until ??? all of them ??? One as it is said (Amos 9) the act of building spices ??? on earth ??? She as it is taught: A lulav between ??? between that is not ??? is valid R' Yehuda says: ??? is valid that is not ??? is invalid, What is the reason? with R' Yehudah ??? by a gezerah shava on the word "kicha" ??? Just as there ??? Even here, ??? And the rabbbis No. ??? by a gezerah shava on the word "kicha" like who ??? this one that teaches A lulav a commandment ??? and if No. ??? is valid like who If it was like Rabbi Yehudah No. ??? why is it that is valid If it was rabbis What then does it mean when it says a commandment In reality lit: In the world rabbis And what does it mean when it says a commandment It is because of this: (Ex. 15) this to me ??? "satisfied" ??? indispensible this one for that one ??? "satisfied" ??? for upon between the posts for upon the altar of gold for upon the fore-curtain indispensible this one for that one ??? it is written ??? a priest who has been anointed ??? a thing of ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry As it is taught: (Lev. 4) One who acts ??? as it was One who acts ??? Just as Scripture states: ???

דף כז,ב גמרא

??? One from ??? No. One who acts ??? The Rabbis taught "satisfied" ??? between that did not have ??? between that did not have ??? the face of ??? that did not have ??? that did not have ??? For it was taught: regarding a cow that did not have ??? that did not have ??? Rav Chisdah said There is no difficulty לא קשיא this one is Rabbi Yehudah this one rabbis as it is taught: ??? atonement who enter ??? in error he is liable A sin-offering with intent ??? he is spiritually cut off And there is no meaning to the word ??? A tevul yom but the remainder of all ??? who enter within ??? all of it ??? from the house of ??? to the face of ??? Rabbi Yehudah says all ??? all of it and from the house of ??? and do not the face of ??? in what way ??? he read (Lev. 16) and he said Adonai to Moses "Speak to ??? your brother and do not ??? in all a time to ??? from the house of ??? to the face of ??? who on the ark of and not ??? rabbis reason that to ??? without ??? from the house of ??? and do not the face of ??? without ??? And R' Yehudah reasoned to ??? and from the house of ??? without ??? and do not the face of ??? without ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא is a law established by the Rabbis Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? R' Yehudah let the Merciful One write in the Torah to ??? and do not the face of ??? and it does not require from the house of ??? and I I thought to say ??? from the house of ??? -- why must that case be taught as well? from the house of ??? the Merciful One why do I have Learn from this ??? And R' Yehudah If it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: to ??? and it is not written: from the house of ??? then I might incorrectly say: What then does it mean when it says ??? from the house of ??? but: ??? Is this not also No. And the rabbbis This certain individual No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? all of it ??? as it is said (Ex. 26) ??? to you between ??? or whether and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? And Rabbi Yehudah What is the reason מאי טעמא Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? They said: rabbis let the Merciful One write in the Torah to ??? and from the house of ??? and it does not require to the face of ??? and I I thought to say from the house of ??? to the face of ??? to the face of ??? the Merciful One why do I have Learn from this to the face of ??? from the house of ??? And the rabbbis So, here, that is not It is necessary for him and that one ??? the Merciful One to the face of ??? a way ??? of the academy of ??? son of Ya'akov to the face of ??? to the east this he built ??? in all places as it is said the face of he does not except the face of ??? And Rabbi Yehudah Let Scripture say the face of What then does it mean when it says to Learn from this to ??? And the rabbbis to This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ And Rabbi Yehudah for he said: to the face of ??? (Num. 19) ??? to ??? also ??? And the rabbbis ??? This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ So, here, This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ Rav Yosef disagreed to Rabbi Yehudah ??? also ??? except ??? two that is not are they, the Ark ??? So, here, that is not does he act? ??? Rabbah said son of ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 16) ??? make kiddush. ??? a place ??? Rava said: this one Hey, isn't it the case that rabbis

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.