It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ג,א גמרא

They said: perhaps, The draining of the blood of ??? he As Mar said: Once its blood has been drained. in any place with the altar ??? A sin-offering of a bird: ??? of its blood to the bottom for the sake of lit. in the name of An elevation-offering of a bird: ??? upon it ??? "uf" She For if it was An elevation-offering of a bird: She is more did he act to it and The draining of the blood of did he act for him So, here, except on account of that do not The menuchot offerings: ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? and not ??? The holiest of holy offerings ??? in the north for the sake of lit. in the name of simple offerings ??? about them ??? holy offerings ??? For if it was simple offerings ??? did he act them ??? for he said: the Merciful One Even ??? and not in the north Watch out for leading vav And who said it? For it was taught in a baraita are slaughtered in any place in the courtyard simple offerings Those that are slaughtered in the south for the sake of lit. in the name of The holiest of holy offerings ??? about them ??? For if it was The holiest of holy offerings in the north did he act them They said: The holiest of holy offerings ??? he that passed over is ??? them ??? If so, ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? also This that he came ??? to it ??? he said This ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? to it ??? She ??? he that passed over is ??? there i.e., in another mishna For also ??? For ??? to it ??? One who says Behold! by the ??? Just as ??? and the hands of ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. and perhaps, he said -- this refers to ??? -- this refers to ??? Behold! This is is invalid According to the sages, So, here, ??? immediately for he said: Rabbi Shimon Even the hands of ??? he has fulfilled his obligation Perhaps, ??? and not anything he and there is no difference he said -- this refers to and there is no difference he said by the Except I can object with text from here: an elevation-offering ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. ??? That this male, and that one female immediately That there are a male goat ??? he No. ??? he said for the sake of a sin-offering. an individual What is there to say? And, too, A sin-offering an individual ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of an elevation-offering ??? female and ascend male, ??? in a case ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and he carried it ??? What is there to say? except between ??? Is this not ??? Passover ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of a guilt-offering ??? That this son of year" and that one son of two immediately That there are a guilt-offering a Nazir and a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at he the Tanna does not distinguish. he said ??? a guilt-offering thefts ??? a guilt-offering misappropriations of sanctified items What is there to say? And, too, a guilt-offering thefts and a guilt-offering misappropriations of sanctified items ??? Passover ??? son of year" and Behold! son of two two except between son of year" to among son of two two Is this not ??? That there are son of year" ??? two and there are son of two ??? year" a male goat ??? a guilt-offering ??? That this wool and that one ??? They said: ??? he ??? and A bull ??? Passover and a guilt-offering ??? and A bull on Passover and a guilt-offering there is not in this case. yes. Here, too,

דף ג,ב גמרא

And what does it mean when it says offerings? most of offerings? Rava said: There is no difficulty לא קשיא here, regarding the handful of meal-offering the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) here, regarding the handful of meal-offering the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? zevach-offering the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) (Lev. 6) and this ??? the Minchah Torah One for all The menuchot offerings: the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? zevach-offering and this ??? the Minchah and a zevach-offering No. it is written Hey, isn't it the case that a Tanna taught: because of ??? upon it he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: even though ??? that is not ??? She ??? and this ??? the Minchah Torah One for all The menuchot offerings: And what does it mean when it says but: ??? is not thus even though ??? One for all of them and this ??? the Minchah and a zevach-offering No. it is written Except I can object with text from here: A sin-offering milk ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. blood ??? A sin-offering by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? A sin-offering a Nazir ??? A sin-offering one suffering from tzara'at shall be ??? for he said: the Merciful One (Lev. 6) and this ??? Torah One for all sin-offerings ??? So, here, According to the sages, this statement that he said poses a contradiction: ??? A sin-offering milk ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. blood ??? A sin-offering by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry ??? for the sake of a sin-offering. a Nazir ??? one suffering from tzara'at is invalid ??? Rav Acha the son of of Raba he would say over for him ??? it ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of that specific A sin-offering Rav Ashi said: There is no difficulty לא קשיא here, regarding the handful of meal-offering ??? here, regarding the handful of meal-offering Minchah-offering of ??? Minchah-offering of ??? ??? No. ??? Minchah-offering of ??? Minchah-offering of ??? at Minchah ??? of it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that a Tanna taught: because of ??? upon it he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: even though ??? She ??? And what does it mean when it says but: ??? is not thus even though ??? One for all of them ??? One for all of them ??? One for all of them ??? of him. ??? Rav Acha the son of Rabba said to Rav Ashi ??? It is because of this: ??? why is it that he said Rabbi Shimon He said to him ??? in reality If so, ??? peace-offerings also ??? peace-offerings in reality thus now there i.e., in another mishna zevach-offering ??? peace-offerings As it is written (Lev. 7) ??? blood ??? blood ??? Here in this case, the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? who ??? (Lev. 7) and all the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? with oil it is written ??? with oil ??? No. ??? all of them ??? they do not say ??? the Merciful One ??? they do not say and this ??? No. ??? them ??? they do not say It is because of this: ??? of Rav Acha. the son of of Raba the validity ??? for him ??? for this side and to Raba for this side ??? for him for Rav, ??? who seeks Rav ??? And there are those who say it was Rav brought this very question ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? zevach-offering

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.