It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לד,א גמרא

with the intent ??? he ??? Abaye and Raba my slave ??? and Rav Yosef; and Rav Ashi do as Rav And for Shmuel ??? And for Shmuel ??? it was said: ??? if it was open, from the house ??? Rav Huna said if there are to him he opens one he is liable in mezuzot One if there are to him two ??? he is liable ??? mezuzot Rav Pappa said: Learn from this ??? This ??? is what he has four ??? he is liable in four, mezuzot This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this Even though it will be ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. he said Ameimar This ??? he is liable in mezuzot He said to him: Rav Ashi ??? Hey, isn't it the case that he does not have ??? He said to him ??? Rav ??? my heart Master, Shmuel he saw This certain individual ??? There was not for him except ??? one ??? for him ??? He said to him like who like Rabbi Meir I will say for he said: ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Who is it as it is taught: ??? from ??? You say from ??? Or perhaps, except ??? Scripture states: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbah said a way ??? from ??? and so when He uprooted ??? He uprooted Rav Shmuel son of ??? in front of Rav ??? in the name of Raba son of ??? he said from here (II Kings 12) ??? Yehodia, ??? the Ark one ??? He shall give" that specific next to the altar of ??? a man the house of Hashem and were given her name the priests. those who guard ??? all ??? the house of Hashem What then does it mean when it says ??? as it is taught: the house of that do not to him except ??? one ??? he is obligated in mezuzot and the sages ??? What is the reason? is a law established by the Rabbis (Deut. 6) mezuzot it is written What is the reason מאי טעמא For R' ??? as it is taught: mezuzot listen I ??? mezuzot two For as it says: (Deut. 11) mezuzot ??? the second that do not Therefore, scripture states: you shall ??? after ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? after ??? except ??? the scripture ??? One these are the words of R' Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: it is not necessary for him For as it says: (Ex. 12) on ??? and on two ??? that do not Scripture states: two Just as Scripture states: two this he built ??? in all places as it is said mezuzot he does not except One until ??? to you the scripture two The Rabbis taught "And you shall write them" It is possible ??? on ??? it is said here, "writing" and it is said there "writing" Just as there on ??? Even here, on ??? or ??? on the way -- this refers to it is said here, "writing" and it is said there "writing" Just as there on ??? Even here, on ??? to whoever ??? "writing" ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? "writing" ??? that is not ??? and just as as it is said there (Jer. 36) and he said to them Blessed be ??? he should read to me the things ??? and as for me, written on ??? He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi the Merciful One he said on mezuzot and is what you say? Do you really mean that? let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? "writing" "writing" Scripture states: (Deut. 6) "And you shall write them" "writing" he was astonished and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had on ??? and based on this lit: from after, As it is written ??? This ??? the value of why do I have If it was Is this not ??? the value of then I might incorrectly say: ??? four ??? indispensible this one for that one and even the writing of one ??? This is obvious! Rav Yehudah said Rav said No. ??? except ??? of ??? and Here, too, This is obvious! No. ??? except ??? of Rav Yehudah for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said all ??? that do not ??? to it ??? is invalid

דף לד,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught ??? Behold! here, four these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: it is not necessary for him ??? two bread ??? two The Rabbis taught It is possible ??? on four skins ??? houses ??? skins Scripture states: (Ex. 13) ??? between your eyes ??? one Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not two and three ??? How so? ??? on four skins ??? houses ??? one and if ??? one ??? houses he has fulfilled his obligation and it is necessary that it should be a resting place ??? these are the words of Rabbi but the sages say it is not necessary for him they agree ??? or ??? between all One and one and if yes. ??? The rabbis taught: How so? ??? prayer of a hand ??? on ??? one and if ??? in four, skins ??? in one house he has fulfilled his obligation and it is necessary ??? as it is said (Ex. 13) and it was the case that to you ??? on your hand. in the same way ??? One ??? thus in the same way ??? One ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah R' Yosei says it is not necessary for him R' Yosi said give thanks for me R' Yehudah ??? he (tefillin) does not have of a hand and he has two tefillin of the tip of ??? on One from them and he places it give thanks we were ??? Rabba said: ??? of R' Yosi in it had a vision R' Yehudah Really? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rav ??? in the name of R' Yochanan prayer of a hand doing it of the tip of and of the tip of Watch out for leading vav And we do not make it of a hand on account of that do not ??? to "Kedushah", lightweight There is no difficulty לא קשיא this one ??? this one ??? the validity She ??? upon them from the beginning The Rabbis taught How so? ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use for me ??? For ??? "Hear!" ??? if ??? For it was taught: ??? Abayye said: There is no difficulty לא קשיא here, "In his right hand is of reads here, "In his right hand is of ??? One who reads reads ??? Rav said ??? Rav said it sprouted anew ??? Abayye said: They did not say that

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.