Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף לד,א גמרא
with the intent ??? he ??? Abaye and Raba my slave ??? and Rav Yosef; and Rav Ashi do as Rav And for Shmuel ??? And for Shmuel ??? it was said: ??? if it was open, from the house ??? Rav Huna said if there are to him he opens one he is liable in mezuzot One if there are to him two ??? he is liable ??? mezuzot Rav Pappa said: Learn from this ??? This ??? is what he has four ??? he is liable in four, mezuzot This is obvious! it is not necessary to teach this Even though it will be ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. he said Ameimar This ??? he is liable in mezuzot He said to him: Rav Ashi ??? Hey, isn't it the case that he does not have ??? He said to him ??? Rav ??? my heart Master, Shmuel he saw This certain individual ??? There was not for him except ??? one ??? for him ??? He said to him like who like Rabbi Meir I will say for he said: ??? Watch out for leading vav And who said it? Who is it as it is taught: ??? from ??? You say from ??? Or perhaps, except ??? Scripture states: ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Rabbah said a way ??? from ??? and so when He uprooted ??? He uprooted Rav Shmuel son of ??? in front of Rav ??? in the name of Raba son of ??? he said from here (II Kings 12) ??? Yehodia, ??? the Ark one ??? He shall give" that specific next to the altar of ??? a man the house of Hashem and were given her name the priests. those who guard ??? all ??? the house of Hashem What then does it mean when it says ??? as it is taught: the house of that do not to him except ??? one ??? he is obligated in mezuzot and the sages ??? What is the reason? is a law established by the Rabbis (Deut. 6) mezuzot it is written What is the reason מאי טעמא For R' ??? as it is taught: mezuzot listen I ??? mezuzot two For as it says: (Deut. 11) mezuzot ??? the second that do not Therefore, scripture states: you shall ??? after ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? after ??? except ??? the scripture ??? One these are the words of R' Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: it is not necessary for him For as it says: (Ex. 12) on ??? and on two ??? that do not Scripture states: two Just as Scripture states: two this he built ??? in all places as it is said mezuzot he does not except One until ??? to you the scripture two The Rabbis taught "And you shall write them" It is possible ??? on ??? it is said here, "writing" and it is said there "writing" Just as there on ??? Even here, on ??? or ??? on the way -- this refers to it is said here, "writing" and it is said there "writing" Just as there on ??? Even here, on ??? to whoever ??? "writing" ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? "writing" ??? that is not ??? and just as as it is said there (Jer. 36) and he said to them Blessed be ??? he should read to me the things ??? and as for me, written on ??? He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Raba to Rav Ashi the Merciful One he said on mezuzot and is what you say? Do you really mean that? let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? "writing" "writing" Scripture states: (Deut. 6) "And you shall write them" "writing" he was astonished and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had on ??? and based on this lit: from after, As it is written ??? This ??? the value of why do I have If it was Is this not ??? the value of then I might incorrectly say: ??? four ??? indispensible this one for that one and even the writing of one ??? This is obvious! Rav Yehudah said Rav said No. ??? except ??? of ??? and Here, too, This is obvious! No. ??? except ??? of Rav Yehudah for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said all ??? that do not ??? to it ??? is invalid
דף לד,ב גמרא
The Rabbis taught ??? Behold! here, four these are the words of Rabbi Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: it is not necessary for him ??? two bread ??? two The Rabbis taught It is possible ??? on four skins ??? houses ??? skins Scripture states: (Ex. 13) ??? between your eyes ??? one Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not two and three ??? How so? ??? on four skins ??? houses ??? one and if ??? one ??? houses he has fulfilled his obligation and it is necessary that it should be a resting place ??? these are the words of Rabbi but the sages say it is not necessary for him they agree ??? or ??? between all One and one and if yes. ??? The rabbis taught: How so? ??? prayer of a hand ??? on ??? one and if ??? in four, skins ??? in one house he has fulfilled his obligation and it is necessary ??? as it is said (Ex. 13) and it was the case that to you ??? on your hand. in the same way ??? One ??? thus in the same way ??? One ??? these are the words of R' Yehudah R' Yosei says it is not necessary for him R' Yosi said give thanks for me R' Yehudah ??? he (tefillin) does not have of a hand and he has two tefillin of the tip of ??? on One from them and he places it give thanks we were ??? Rabba said: ??? of R' Yosi in it had a vision R' Yehudah Really? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Rav ??? in the name of R' Yochanan prayer of a hand doing it of the tip of and of the tip of Watch out for leading vav And we do not make it of a hand on account of that do not ??? to "Kedushah", lightweight There is no difficulty לא קשיא this one ??? this one ??? the validity She ??? upon them from the beginning The Rabbis taught How so? ??? and that which was sanctified for Temple use for me ??? For ??? "Hear!" ??? if ??? For it was taught: ??? Abayye said: There is no difficulty לא קשיא here, "In his right hand is of reads here, "In his right hand is of ??? One who reads reads ??? Rav said ??? Rav said it sprouted anew ??? Abayye said: They did not say that
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.