It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ד,א גמרא

What do I have to learn from Thus said Rabbi Shimon The reason is For R' Shimon It is because of this: ??? No. ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? he or perhaps, The reason is ??? It is because of this: As it is written (Lev. 6) and this ??? the Minchah and a zevach-offering No. it is written He said to him: anything ??? of Rabbi Shimon ??? No. ??? for him It is because of this: ??? No. ??? for him It is because of this: ??? and this ??? No. ??? for him It is because of this: ??? of Rav Acha. the son of ??? except ??? a sinner and Minchah-offering of ??? This is satisfactory Minchah-offering of a sinner A sin-offering ??? the Merciful One (Lev. 5) No. ??? upon it oil and They do not give it upon it Watch out for leading vav frankincense For "It is a sin-offering" etc. except Minchah-offering of ??? From where do we derive this? for it teaches: a Tanna taught: in front of Rav ??? Minchah-offering of ??? He said to him then the ruling is acceptable. ??? (Num. 5) ??? iniquity it is written of it and the case is that of a sin-offering, it is written (Lev. 10) it he gave to you ??? iniquity ??? Just as A sin-offering ??? Even Minchah-offering of ??? Just as An invalidated sin-offering that did not have ??? Even Minchah-offering of ??? is invalid that did not have ??? Except I can object with text from here: a guilt-offering ??? is invalid, that did not have ??? iniquity iniquity ??? iniquity ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? What then does it mean when it says practical distinction Hey, isn't it the case that a Tanna taught: of the academy of R' Yishmael (Lev. 14) ??? came ??? This is ??? This is ??? And furthermore, ??? As it is written (Lev. 5) if No. ??? and exalted. ??? except For ??? the value of ??? he ??? And if you say yes. ??? the value of ??? the Merciful One regarding A sin-offering (Lev. 4) ??? it ??? it ??? that did not have ??? is invalid but: all holy offerings between ??? between that did not have ??? are proper except Minchah-offering of a sinner and Minchah-offering of ??? that did not have ??? From where do we derive this? A sin-offering The reason is What then does it mean when it says It is because of this: As it is written of it She So, here, this one it is written in them? She a guilt-offering also this one it is written of him. he This certain individual he after ??? it is written: As it is taught: but: a guilt-offering It is not said in it he except after ??? should it itself that did not have ??? is valid So rather, he why do I have ??? Rav said a guilt-offering ??? is valid ??? an elevation-offering ??? yes. No. ??? did not say he read he ??? Rav said Minchah-offering of ??? that did not have ??? is invalid Because ??? and not ??? and thus You say ??? a Nazir

דף ד,ב גמרא

and a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at ??? that did not have ??? Because ??? and not ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: all The menuchot offerings: ??? that did not have ??? except that did not have if they put it up on the altar ??? guilt-obligation except ??? a sinner and Minchah-offering of ??? and if ??? Let the Tanna teach: also except ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: she entered an individual she entered community No. The tanna teaches: For It was taught by she entered ??? herself she entered ??? zevach-offering No. The tanna teaches: And this is what the tanna means to teach: ??? that do not ??? to them time this one ??? to it time No. ??? Mar said: and thus You say ??? a Nazir and a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at ??? that did not have ??? Because ??? and not ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: all ??? that did not have ??? are proper except that did not have if they put it up on the altar ??? guilt-obligation except ??? and A sin-offering and if ??? Let the Tanna teach: also except ??? a Nazir and a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at ??? and not ??? immediately That there are a guilt-offering thefts and a guilt-offering misappropriations of sanctified items ??? they came he the Tanna does not distinguish. what is the difference here, a guilt-offering a Nazir and a guilt-offering one suffering from tzara'at ??? and not ??? Behold! also ??? and not ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? the scripture between ??? or whether validate it ??? in them? ??? after death validate it ??? in them? ??? after death For it was taught in a baraita the his wife ??? ??? No. ??? He disagreed with this R' Yehudah the son of R' Shimon ben Pazi: validate it also who ??? in them? ??? after death For it was taught in a mishna: ??? coins ??? benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. because of ??? in going all of them peace-offerings did he die they were to him coins ??? he is equivalent. A sin-offering he shall carry to the Sea of Salt benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. he is equivalent. an elevation-offering ??? of them an elevation-offering but the laws of misappropriation apply to them, he is equivalent. peace-offerings ??? of them peace-offerings and they are eaten ??? one And there is no meaning to the word ??? bread Hey, isn't it the case that an elevation-offering and peace-offerings ??? they came after death Rav Pappa said: thus ??? he said R' ??? No. ??? after death ??? that is not ??? he

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.