It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מה,א גמרא

??? If it was ??? he If it was ??? priests ??? it is written in them? In reality lit: In the world ??? priests and thus he comes to say No. ??? priests ??? for him ??? and not a ram ??? is essential. them ??? priests except ??? that even ??? No. ??? he that is not ??? we do not have ??? a Tanna taught: words words The tanna teaches: (Ezek. 46) by day ??? A bull son of mornings ??? Six ??? and a ram ??? A bull Just as Scripture states: on account of as it is said in the Torah ??? And from where do we learn ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and did not find two sends one Scripture states: A bull Six ??? Just as Scripture states: on account of ??? in the Torah seven And from where do we learn ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and did not find seven ??? Six Scripture states: Six And from where do we learn ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and did not find Six ??? five five ??? four four ??? three three ??? two and even one Scripture states: ??? as it was ??? and based on this lit: from after, As it is written thus Six ??? why do I have ??? where it is possible ??? And from where do we learn ??? this one for that one Scripture states: ??? (Ezek. 45) Thus he said Hashem God ??? on the first ??? A bull son of mornings ??? and A sin-offering ??? A sin-offering an elevation-offering She that R' Yochanan said parasha (scriptural section) -- this refers to Elijah future ??? Rav Ashi said: ??? bring offerings in the days of Ezra like the way ??? in the days of Moses Another teaching is like this: Rabbi Yehudah says parasha (scriptural section) -- this refers to Elijah future ??? He said to him: R' Yosi ??? bring offerings in the days of Ezra like the way ??? in the days of Moses He said to him: ??? (Ezek. 44) and all ??? from ??? and from ??? No. ??? the priests. priests he that is not ??? this one Israel ??? that R' Yochanan said parasha (scriptural section) -- this refers to Elijah future ??? Ravina he said priests It is necessary to teach this for him ??? I thought to say Because ??? also roadkill ??? Come and learn from this. (Ezek. 45) and thus shall you do in the week ??? From the man ??? the house seven R' Yochanan said: these seven tribes ??? and even though that do not ??? of ??? if ??? And they said milk is permitted. From the man ??? This teaches that do not they are obligated except on ??? a thing with ??? It once happened Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? that specific man ??? son of ??? was his name ??? he ??? that were his words ??? these are the words of Torah Just as One who acts raised up three hundred ??? oil and he sat ??? Thus said Rabbi Shimon if they were to them ??? The Rabbis taught (Ezek. 46) ??? may he do it? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? as it was ??? and oil ??? Thus said Rabbi Shimon And so the attribute of ??? One She except ??? they were to them ??? and not they were ??? A bull one ??? and do not ??? all of them without ??? and if they were to them

דף מה,ב גמרא

??? and not he was to them ??? a ram one ??? and not ??? all of them without ???

דף מה,ב משנה

??? yes. ??? ??? and not ??? is essential. ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? ??? these are the words of Rabbi Akiva he said Rabbi Shimon son of ??? No. For rather, ??? ??? is not essential. ??? which provides ??? as they were Israel in the wilderness ??? year" ??? without bread Even here, ??? without bread he said Rabbi Shimon The halacha is in accordance with the words of son of ??? but: yes. ??? for all of is said ??? was sacrificed in the wilderness and all is said ??? priests yes. was sacrificed in the wilderness ??? both these and these: On account of what I says ??? without bread because of ??? permit ??? and not ??? without ??? that do not to him who ???

דף מה,ב גמרא

The rabbis taught: (Lev. 23) ??? on ??? guilt-obligation on ??? seven of ??? despite the fact that do not bread If so, Just as Scripture states: on ??? This teaches that did not have ??? before ??? these are the words of R' Tarfon Rabbi Akiva says: It is possible there are. there are. ??? here, there are. there are. ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? next to ??? are not there are. except ??? have come ??? have come ??? bread Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found Just as ??? was sacrificed in the wilderness for just as ??? priests No. was sacrificed in the wilderness and Perhaps ??? Is this not we do not have this one ??? we do not have ??? Behold! also ??? From where can you derive ??? Perhaps thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: the Merciful One If it was he is required A bull and a second person ??? If it was he is required two ??? and a ram one ??? Learn from this ??? is essential. ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? Just as there bread Even here, bread son of ??? Just as there ??? Even here, ??? son of ??? also let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? Just as there bread Even here, bread ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? What then does it mean when it says practical distinction ??? of the academy of R' Yishmael (Lev. 14) ??? came ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in a case ??? for him but: in a case That there are ??? for him ??? for him ??? and Rabbi Akiva also ??? a thing ??? To exclude Behold! ??? And if you wish, I would say ??? (Lev. 23) and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? to Hashem ??? Rabbi Akiva reasoned If it was ??? a thing ??? you shall says this bread son of ??? Is it written ??? to Hashem ??? it is written Who is a thing that a little bit of it to Hashem and partially ??? you shall says these ??? and Rabbi Akiva Is it written and that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? to Hashem ??? to Hashem ??? it is written Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? For Rav Huna said: ??? the Name and were given ??? R' Yochanan said: Everyone acknowledges

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.