It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מו,א גמרא

??? this to this ??? this one for that one and whichever he ??? that are theirs ??? Ulla said They asked in the west ??? makes ??? Or perhaps, makes ??? for him from that of Rabbi Yochanan for he said: Rabbi Yochanan ??? makes ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? he does not makes ??? of R' Yochanan Back to the main body of the text: ??? for him ??? This is obvious to him. to Rabbi Yochanan ??? makes ??? he does not makes ??? or, perhaps, ??? This is obvious to him. ??? from doubt for him The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. He said to him R' Yehudah son of ??? to Rav Huna. the son of of Rav Joshua Hey, isn't it the case that For it is written (Lev. 23) ??? to Hashem ??? according to ??? it is written ??? son of ??? and R' ??? according to ??? and not according to ??? Rather, what can we conclude? ??? to you This comes to imply from the beginning he arises and What does it mean when it says that the bread becomes holy? ??? to Hashem ??? a thing ??? Here in this case, also, a thing ??? makes ??? We challenge that from the following baraita before it was even the case that it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? to the sun ??? bread after ??? to the sun the blood ??? shall eat and the hands of ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? is invalid, ??? the blood separates terumah from ??? on ??? before it was even the case that it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it he has fulfilled his obligation to the sun ??? he has fulfilled his obligation to the sun the blood ??? shall eat and the hands of ??? He has not fulfilled his obligation. ??? is invalid, ??? the blood separates terumah ??? on ??? before it was even the case that it was slaughtered with the intent of consuming it ??? to the sun sends bread after ??? to the sun the blood ??? shall eat and the hands of ??? he has fulfilled his obligation ??? on ??? is invalid, ??? the blood separates terumah from ??? on ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? makes ??? immediately ??? this to this ??? for him bread ??? also a thangkgiving-offering that I a thangkgiving-offering ??? peace-offerings Just as peace-offerings ??? without bread Even a thangkgiving-offering ??? without bread Thus said Rabbi ??? if ??? to say ??? makes ???

דף מו,ב גמרא

he loses it ??? he loses it ??? and if ??? to say ??? It is not makes ??? bread ??? bread after that specific ??? required ??? Or perhaps, required ??? he loses it ??? No. ??? to you ??? he is required ??? For ??? to you ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? ??? No. ??? to you for he said: ??? the essence For ??? to you who follow the reasoning ??? ??? for he said: bread the essence What then does it mean when it says immediately ??? the essence he is required ??? or, perhaps, immediately ??? that are his ??? It is not necessary ??? The question remains suspended and cannot be answered. Abaye said to him: to Raba what is the difference here, two ??? bread ??? and what is the difference here, seven ??? and A bull ??? that is not ??? bread and not ??? he said ??? Because ??? this to this ??? Consider this case: a thangkgiving-offering that is not ??? this to this ??? except ??? Just as a thangkgiving-offering peace-offerings So, too, here in this case, also, peace-offerings who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna there is not in this case. offerings? ??? Here in this case, That there are offerings? ??? Behold! and Behold! except ??? a Nazir Just as a ram a Nazir even though That there are offerings? ??? peace-offerings he ??? something other than this No. Here in this case, also, there is no difference and there in that case From where do we derive this? as it is taught: (Num. 6) and ??? may he do it? zevach-offering peace-offerings to Hashem on ??? the commandments. This teaches ??? came guilt-obligation ??? a ram ??? For this reason ??? that did not have ??? No. His holiness ??? The rabbis taught: two ??? before ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah ??? Just as your soul If it was as regard to eating, ??? If it was for burning ??? For what reason them ??? an image Rabbah said In reality lit: In the world as regard to eating, ??? lest ??? to them ??? and they shall say ??? No. ??? bread without ??? now also ??? and they No. ??? No. are they, ??? we do not have ??? now That there are ??? he ??? them Rabbah said ??? I thought to say to it For it was taught in a baraita R' Yehudah said: ??? son of ??? all a priest ??? he does not a sinner He said to him: Rabban Yochanan ben Zakai No. For rather, all a priest that is not ??? a sinner except ??? the written Torah this for themselves (Lev. 6) and all Minchah-offering of a priest ??? It may not be eaten Because ??? and two ??? and bread ??? there are. how they are eaten Behold! two ??? How so? Shall I say ??? with ??? because a thangkgiving-offering and to the sun who No. ??? priests ??? them except Is this not ??? before ??? And we have learned how there are. they are eaten Perhaps, as regard to eating, ??? Abaye said to him: In reality lit: In the world ??? with ??? and that he came it is a problem to you ??? and to the sun ??? a thangkgiving-offering No. ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) two ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) as it is said (Num. 28) ??? the afternoon service (Minchah) ??? to Hashem Rav Yosef said: In reality lit: In the world for burning ??? And this is like the position The reason is that is not ??? on account of that do not ??? holy offerings on Yom Tov He said to him Abaye who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna Is this not ??? objection Here in this case, ??? objection ??? something ??? and a male goat of Yom Kippur except Rav Yosef said ??? lest ??? to them ??? after from here He said to him Abaye this accounts The whole time ??? thus ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? also where he teaches the image of ??? Rava said: as regard to eating, ??? It is because of this: of Rabbah Is this not ??? except the written Torah Rabba said: ??? I thought to say to it As it is written (Lev. 23) ??? bread ??? to Hashem Just as ??? before ??? Even two ??? before ??? Just as ??? as regard to eating, Even two ??? also as regard to eating,

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.